I don't see it that way. However that's the way the club or 'unofficial' leaks will probably portray things. We've already witnessed the demonisation of not 1 but 3 managers, all of which had way bigger reputation then Ole did.
Madness.... by many reports SAF had left a list of whom he thought should go and who should be brought in and we had Thiago lined up and then Moyes decided against that chased Cesc and moved for Bale when it was too late.
How was Jose not supported. He was granted 2 CB’s, the most expensive midfielder in the world at the time, Matic, Fred and a record fee for Lukaku. How is that not supporting him? Let’s not forget he was also granted Sanchez and supposedly he only asked for another CB with a week to go in the transfer window last summer when it was pretty obvious he was hanging on by his finger tips.
Let’s also look at this now. We just bought someone who looks like he might be a brilliant RB for 55mil was it and we’ve just spent a record fee for a CB. How are the managers not being supported?
If Dybala was asking for 18mil he’s making it clear he doesn’t want to be at United because he isn’t worth that much at all. We are right to walk away and if we have to see what else is out there or wait till the right target becomes available next year.
Juventus had hired totally inexperienced managers and yet.....they still signed the players they wanted mainly because players knew that there's a top football board whose calling the shots and they have a plan that's worth following. The reality is quite simply. Considering the clear flaws in the squad we shouldn't be in a situation were we'll days away from transfer deadline with just 2 decent signings and some winger from the championship. That's simply not good enough.
Similarly with Solskjaer too I guess.Indeed, Mourinho's contract extension was a reward for the first season and the start to the second. Once again though it's an example of how the club shot their loads early. Should have at least waited till the end of his second season before handing out any contract extensions and obviously by the end of his second season the writing was already on the wall
Madness.... by many reports SAF had left a list of whom he thought should go and who should be brought in and we had Thiago lined up and then Moyes decided against that chased Cesc and moved for Bale when it was too late.
How was Jose not supported. He was granted 2 CB’s, the most expensive midfielder in the world at the time, Matic, Fred and a record fee for Lukaku. How is that not supporting him? Let’s not forget he was also granted Sanchez and supposedly he only asked for another CB with a week to go in the transfer window last summer when it was pretty obvious he was hanging on by his finger tips.
Let’s also look at this now. We just bought someone who looks like he might be a brilliant RB for 55mil was it and we’ve just spent a record fee for a CB. How are the managers not being supported?
If Dybala was asking for 18mil he’s making it clear he doesn’t want to be at United because he isn’t worth that much at all. We are right to walk away and if we have to see what else is out there or wait till the right target becomes available next year.
Pretty sure he rejected us. We offered him 11m after tax, the reported 18m are pre tax. The agent fee of 13m was high and maybe his image rights a stumbling block as well. And he probably wasnt too excited to join. So we ended it, while he wasnt really pushing for a quick agreement.
No, they didn't. Juventus struggled a lot on the transfer market with Ranieri, Ferrara, Del Neri and even with Conte. They had to purchase from the bargain bin and it's only because Conte performed true miracles that they begun to attract proper players.
Which in the case of Jose you bought into that demonisation good and proper.
I don't think that's true? More like a Bayern situation where they just hoover up all the talent from the lesser clubs within the league.Juventus always bought bargains because they got an excellent scouting net who can pick great players. That's why they had been a dominating force in the Serie A since the 40s. However they almost always get the people they need and players go there irrespective of the manager on top.
Throughout my time the only time Juventus struggled was between the dismantling of the triade (2006) and the new administration (2010) when Juventus were basically leaderless. Then Andrea Agnelli took over, Marotta and Paratici soon followed and the rest is history.
Juventus always bought bargains because they got an excellent scouting net who can pick great players. That's why they had been a dominating force in the Serie A since the 40s. However they almost always get the people they need and players go there irrespective of the manager on top.
Throughout my time the only time Juventus struggled was between the dismantling of the triade (2006) and the new administration (2010) when Juventus were basically leaderless. Then Andrea Agnelli took over, Marotta and Paratici soon followed and the rest is history.
Yeah but when he signed that extension, he probably was promised some more signings. He had a point still, doesn't mean he is faultless. The club responded because there were rumors with PSG but without a doubt Mourinho also asked for more funds to sign certain players. Otherwise he wouldn't have complained the way he did about it. I'm glad he's not the manager anymore anywayMourinho DID get supported. He spent nearly 300m, the problem was all his signings failed apart from Ibra who was free, and Pogba who's obviously divisive.
No wonder the club lost faith in him and his decisions.
How has he been good? Really?Truth is we have never been attractive to foreign talent relative to our size. We never bought superstars from other clubs, van persie is the only one that comes to mind when fergie was in charge. Rio and rooney were english. People really want to get at woodward, but the truth is, he has been good this summer. If we can bring in an attacking midfielder and with the level of youth we have coming through and those being signed, this will turn around
So you’re agreeing that by sprinkling then dosh we are supporting the manager and your whole point up until now you’ve decided was just wrong. Great. Now let’s all move to the Havertz thread and see about making some ritual sacrifices to see if we can persuade ED to move for him.Sure. Everyone would swap Thiago for Fellaini as much as everyone would go on replacing the likes of Giggs, Scholes, Ronaldo, Rio and Vidic, with, well, Young, Valencia, Cleverley, Jones and Smalling. There's no doubt that the club like sprinkling the dosh every now and then. Whether its anywhere near to what a top club like ours need is a different matter altogether. There's a reason why the Glazers are running not 1 sports entity but 2 sports entity to the ground.
He is a carbon copy of Di Maria, Icardi and Higuain
Same mentality and attitude
To be fair, that's most Argentinians. I've lived for almost three years in Argentina, and work/do a good job is the last thing 95% want to do. No wonder the inflation is killing the country.Exactly,
Dybala was like that plumber who doesn't want the job and so quotes you 3x the price hoping you'll back away - but if you don't then he or she is quids in.
So you’re agreeing that by sprinkling then dosh we are supporting the manager and your whole point up until now you’ve decided was just wrong. Great. Now let’s all move to the Havertz thread and see about making some ritual sacrifices to see if we can persuade ED to move for him.
To be fair, that's most Argentinians. I've lived for almost three years in Argentina, and work/do a good job is the last thing 95% want to do. No wonder the inflation is killing the country.
Mourinho DID get supported. He spent nearly 300m, the problem was all his signings failed apart from Ibra who was free, and Pogba who's obviously divisive.
No wonder the club lost faith in him and his decisions.
Can people stop with this whole Argentine discrimination rhetoric though? Like seriously there's 40 odd million people in the country.
To be fair, that's most Argentinians. I've lived for almost three years in Argentina, and work/do a good job is the last thing 95% want to do. No wonder the inflation is killing the country.
So how does this given we’ve spent record fees still not keen we are supporting the manager? There is a difference between supporting a manager what we have been doing and spending money we don’t have to try and catch up to City after we’ve made bad investments on players over the years.What I said is that while the club do occasionally sprinkle the dosh its nowhere near to what is needed to bring/keep United on top. As said, there's a reason why the Glazers are running not 1 sports entity but 2 sports entity to the ground. Its also the same reason why all our former managers come up with the same conclusion. The club has poorly backed them
How does his image rights thing work, is it that United would have to pay him, or the company who owns him money every time United use him for promotion?
And that's exactly the issue. Nearly every player he bought he wanted replacing within 2 years.Yeah this point needs to be driven through. Jose Mourinho got a LOT of backing from the board on transfers. An absolute ton of backing in fact.
Fred, Diogo Dalot, Romelu Lukaku, Nemanja Matic, Victor Lindelöf, Lee Grant, Alexis Sánchez, Paul Pogba, Henrikh Mkhitaryan (traded to Arsenal for Alexis Sánchez), Eric Bailly and Zlatan Ibrahimovic.
These are all the players that Jose brought into the club for a sum total of £392 million (gross) pounds. - £282 million net spend. That's £94 million avg every transfer window.
The only player that's been a success is Paul Pogba and Zlatan. Zlatan got injured as we all remember, and he did come on a free transfer. Lindelöf was largely a failure so far under Mourinho, so his only success purchase was one of the best players in the world anyway in Pogba. Matic has been ok but not exactly a world beater, and now he's often a liability.
So what happens, when Jose goes to the media and criticizes the board for not backing him in the transfer market? They point to the players he's purchased and go "Hey Jose, about those transfers you say you lack?
If there was a meme to be made out of the whole situation, it would be something along the lines of Jose Mourniho criticizing Jose Mourinho for buying players he can't use.
They weren't leaderless, the transition was done a delivered by JC Blanc. The issue is that during that time Juventus weren't attractive and weren't particularly wealthy. Your constant Juventus PR is just weird. As Lash said the first part isn't true and they struggled to find players for a long time.
So how does this given we’ve spent record fees still not keen we are supporting the manager? There is a difference between supporting a manager what we have been doing and spending money we don’t have to try and catch up to City after we’ve made bad investments on players over the years.
It’s about buying the right players at the right time and building the team, not just spending 500mil in one summer because really no one can do that. Looks like we’ve spent 160 mil already this summer and there is still a chance we’ll bring in more. Managers not being supported. Honestly
Not sure how it works myself in detail. I imagine that we pay the party that owns his image rights to obtain a fair share of them or the right to use him for joint commercial deals with the club, not the exclusive rights. I dont think we pay him every time, we obtain the right for club purposes and then we can use him for that as much as we want. At least that is what i think
But with Dybala, the problem is also a different one. We want the 25% wages to go down clause if we dont reach the CL, which he didnt agree too. Then the high agent fees on top of his high wages. Then his image rights are as usual a haggling process, owned by a third party. Image rights of star players are important and of high value. We would have to pay a lot to obtain the right for commercial club purposes and it would take a while. And then his former agency are suing for a breach of contract after he left them, we got apparently warned of doing a transfer. If the player then isnt really convinced to join, i am not sure we would commit and push for a deal with only a few days left.
So how does this given we’ve spent record fees still not keen we are supporting the manager? There is a difference between supporting a manager what we have been doing and spending money we don’t have to try and catch up to City after we’ve made bad investments on players over the years.
It’s about buying the right players at the right time and building the team, not just spending 500mil in one summer because really no one can do that. Looks like we’ve spent 160 mil already this summer and there is still a chance we’ll bring in more. Managers not being supported. Honestly
Of course they were leaderless. Calciopoli brought Juventus to its knees. Before that point they had the best board of directors, the best manager, the best players etc. The second later their board was taken to court, they were forced into the Serie B and their reputation was ruined. To make matters worse, Lapo Elkann (the village idiot of the Agnelli family) saw this as an opportunity to get involved into Juventus, something he could have easily done considering that he had as many shares as his own brother did. Juventus were in shambles to the point that Pessotto ended up 'accidentally' falling out of windows. It was only after 2010 that things started to get normal with Jon appointing Andrea Agnelli who quickly signed Marotta and Paratici.
We've entered a vicious cycle due to our lack of competitive success.
Had we been more successful on the pitch lately, De Ligt would have potentially joined us - actually saving us money versus Maguire no less - and Dybala probably wouldn't have asked for so much.
So now we either overpay or we accept we'll not be able to buy any of the world's best players any more until we manage to succeed without them.
Fun times ahead...
And the fact that you are stating in your first sentence will influence your actions when it comes to purchasing lottery tickets. Somehow the logic that you expressed in your previous post dismiss the use of probabilities that you used in this one. Players/agents will try to determine the likeliness of a club to achieve certain goals, like everyone else do about pretty much everything, and it will influence their likelihood to be interested in a club.
In the case of United top players will be wary because whatever we say, in the last 6 years we have failed to regularly improve the team and the squad options. They have no reason to believe that if they join us, this football club will manage to improve the team around them.