VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
to be fair we hated his guts up to may this year
Hated Raiola? Never
Always wanted him to have his own statute here and delivering Pogba will be great cause for it.
to be fair we hated his guts up to may this year
Jump man!As long as the thread title is Donkey Kong I'm good.
What happened!?Jump man!
to be fair we hated his guts up to may this year
Its on, like Donkey Ko-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-ong!And though the Caf was rather sad
I just had to laugh; cos
Jose’s wife had posted his dream lineup on her Twitter feed
Raiola is a snake. He will piss us off again im sure but for now he is our little fat pizza man bringing us all the goodies !
Human trafficking is illegalWe are quibbling over around €20m? Didnt Rojo cost us about that? Just give Rojo to Raoila and call it done.
I'll drink fecking bleach. I have invested so much time reading this muppet thread.If this deal falls through after all this fuss, I'll shoot myself
Do you mean as some kind of house/ sex slave?We are quibbling over around €20m? Didnt Rojo cost us about that? Just give Rojo to Raoila and call it done.
Human trafficking is illegal
Do you mean as some kind of house/ sex slave?
It's all semantics the deal isn't going to break down over a few million to either party.
I still maintain that it's done and we're letting Juve do incomings before the market inflates and they're know to have cash in the bank.
If this deal falls through because we are not willing to pay Raiola it will be like the time when we failed to get Hazard
We would be right to not pay Raiola as we have no obligation towards him. It's Juve who entered in the 20% on transfer fee deal when they signed Pogba. They're expecting us to pay something which they agreed to!If this deal falls through because we are not willing to pay Raiola it will be like the time when we failed to get Hazard
We would be right to not pay Raiola as we have no obligation towards him. It's Juve who entered in the 20% on transfer fee deal when they signed Pogba. They're expecting us to pay something which they agreed to!
It's all semantics the deal isn't going to break down over a few million to either party.
I still maintain that it's done and we're letting Juve do incomings before the market inflates and they're know to have cash in the bank.
They'd put it another way. They'd just say they are upping the overall fee so they receive more money. It's semantics but ultimately they just want more money in their kitty.We would be right to not pay Raiola as we have no obligation towards him. It's Juve who entered in the 20% on transfer fee deal when they signed Pogba. They're expecting us to pay something which they agreed to!
Well, I doubt it would be for Rojo to make him toast.Do you mean as some kind of house/ sex slave?
crazy they would pay that amount of money for himLa Repubblica state that Juve want to get this deal done soon so they can pay the release clause for Higuian which expires in a few days.
What i don't get is that i thought thats why Juve wanted 120mil Euros, to cover the agent fee?. We offered 100mil ,they wanted 120mil which we have supposedly agreed so whats the holdup?.
What i don't get is that i thought thats why Juve wanted 120mil Euros, to cover the agent fee?. We offered 100mil ,they wanted 120mil which we have supposedly agreed so whats the holdup?.