RDCR07
Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
Damn I miss Paddy. What a legend!We should get Evra back as well.
Damn I miss Paddy. What a legend!We should get Evra back as well.
Bonucci worth record signing for a defender, Juventus knows that. Few million more than Mangala is not worth considering knowing Man City is desperate. We offer world record for Pogba that no one yet joined in, so a little bit different.So is Juventus getting ready to say no to a net benefit of £100M in 4 years? They did say no to Bonucci for Chelsea, that's an interesting fact.
They still will have a formidable midfield even if Pogba leaves but the same cant be said for their defense if Bonucci leaves. Hence Bonucci is more important to them than Pogba.So is Juventus getting ready to say no to a net benefit of £100M in 4 years? They did say no to Bonucci for Chelsea, that's an interesting fact.
For the record, I don't believe Pogba is worth £100m either from a purely footballing perspective. The premium is largely a byproduct of his global profile and huge potential, though I do think he's easily worth £60m or more in today's market.Is has had an effect on prices, yes, but nothing like as much as to account for £100m for Pogba. £100m! Plus vast wages! For a player who will be lucky to have even a third of the impact of someone like Bale or Modric.
And of course Dier and Allie were unproven, but that still doesn't account for the huge discrepancy between £9m for the pair of them and the idea of more than 10 times that amount for Pogba. I could realistically speculate that, right now, out there somewhere, are several young CMs who will be better than Pogba and obtainable, if only they could be found, for relative peanuts. The morale of this story? Invest in scouting, not 'big name' players.
As for the rest, 90% of all media football transfer stories - whether from "well-respected" journalists and media outlets or not - are rubbish. They mainly write to attract attention - because that's the core of their job.
Care to explain the bold?Spurs get 25m per season from Nike
(Edit: Sorry, it's currently at 10m with UA - So thats 65m per season)
United get 75m per season from Adidas
50m extra from a single sponsor....
That is why we go for players at these prices, we can, because our income allows us to.
Spurs right now and for the foreseeable future wont ever match our financial power.
This isn't a dig btw Glaston, I do understand what you are saying about over paying, but supply and demand. Pogba is one of the best midfielders in the game in my opinion, top 10 let's say, but also, is at a good age, and probably more getable than the others right now.
We want him, we have to pay the money, it's that simple really.
Can we afford it....? Yes. That is all that matters.
This isn't a potential club destroying signing
you should know being a spurs fan with your spurs math #whitetextCare to explain the bold?
No, I wouldn't, despite such a decision being a big gamble.
Alli has things that Pogba lacks: energy, aggression, a sheer drive to win, giving his all. Moreover, he's adapted to the Prem and settled in England. Pogba might not adapt well and might not settle.
I'd also note that Alli got 10 goals and 9 assists for Spurs in the league. Considering he was aged just 19 for most of the season, that's outstanding.
No, I wouldn't, despite such a decision being a big gamble.
Alli has things that Pogba lacks: energy, aggression, a sheer drive to win, giving his all. Moreover, he's adapted to the Prem and settled in England. Pogba might not adapt well and might not settle.
It isn't the reality at all. It's the reality you've convinced yourself of from all the hype. Alli cost £4m. Dier cost £5m. Has the football world changed so much since then?
You seem to have taken as gospel all the media guff about which clubs have offered what amounts for player X, when most of it is, of course, not true. Even £35m for Mane pales besides £100m for Pogba.
Makes a lot of sense if we can stomach the idea of losing him on a free then buying him back for a world record fee (for a midfielder). He'd probably like playing with Martial, Morgan, and being reunited with Januzaj.
makes sense to wrap up before first game of the season. that way we can continue to see who needs to just leave. instead of worrying about who to replacelooks like Jose has given it till Aug 7th to wrap up this transfer. If not done he is going for an alternative.
Care to explain the bold?
Did not you get the memo? He is better than Zlatan Ibrahimovic who would struggle to get a start for spurs.
I have no idea ,actually I already wonder the same thing. It's not a really necessary signing but conditioned by the future transfer ban
Neymar's release clause is to be expected to be around 250m Euros.Pogba isn't worth £100m.
For that money, I expect peak Ronaldo, Bale or Neymar so wouldn't be too gutted if he joins Madrid for that sum.
I am worried the price tag will get to him and he'll join and not reproduce his form at Juventus, let alone become one of the best in the world (to justify the price tag)
That said, it's not my money and hopefully this won't affect our future spending. Good luck to him if he joins!
He does one thing good all game and he is now worth £100m instantly.Like when he crosses for Griezmann and Neuer goes out, misses the ball, and Griezmann scores ? Right before, he played Mustafi like he was playing street football...
He does one thing good all game and he is now worth £100m instantly.
Neymar's release clause is to be expected to be around 250m Euros.
Bale, I am not so sure. As for Ronaldo, we already brought in Zlatan. Despite all of this, Pogba and these names that you have thrown in, plays in diff position. We are in dire need of a midfield general. Not a winger or a proven goalscorer. These two are already been brought by Mourinho in the form of Zlatan and Mikhtaryan.
If you suggested for either of these three names; Modric, Kroos or Veratti then it's fine. That being said, clubs that owns them doesn't want to sell. Especially, PSG. Money is not a question for them.
I'm basing my opinion on his skill level and not his marketability. That's up to smarter guys than myself to do all that. Of course I see the appeal of how much revenue he can bring in, but does he have the same charisma as Ronaldo or even Beckham? Theres a lot of ifs around the whole deal and of course I would love him to sign for us and become a great player. Maybe its the tactics hes been asked to play for France but I haven't seen anything out of the ordinary from him this tournament, gave away a clumsy penalty against Ireland and should have given away another one against Germany, played too many sidewards passes as well for my liking. But again it could be the tactics hes been asked to play to, for £100m he should stand out a lot more in a midfield with Sissoko (who looks good)It's not about his worth on the field only. The 100M pound bid includes what he is worth including for marketing and future play. You seem to think the club will just offer random amounts of money to sign players without having numerous formulas for estimating a player's worth to a club. Of course he isn't worth 100M for his current skill, the club is not buying him solely for that. They want to capitalize on the player's fanbase and star attitude that would allow the club to make the money. The club will not make offers that do not benefit the club financially. Hell, that's exactly what fans criticized the Glazers for trying to do in the first place, to only try to make money. Now when they open their checkbook people complain that they're overpaying for players. It's the day and age, fecking Troy Deeney got denied a 30M pound bid. Troy fecking Deeney. Paul Pogba is the most promising and one of the best midfielders in the world currently and his marketability is exponential. I don't see why any fans of clubs complain about how much/little players cost unless they themselves have the background and information required to do financial analysis on that player.
Oh yeah, if there's one thing Bayern, Barca and Real have taught us it's buying big name players isn't the way to go.Is has had an effect on prices, yes, but nothing like as much as to account for £100m for Pogba. £100m! Plus vast wages! For a player who will be lucky to have even a third of the impact of someone like Bale or Modric.
And of course Dier and Allie were unproven, but that still doesn't account for the huge discrepancy between £9m for the pair of them and the idea of more than 10 times that amount for Pogba. I could realistically speculate that, right now, out there somewhere, are several young CMs who will be better than Pogba and obtainable, if only they could be found, for relative peanuts. The morale of this story? Invest in scouting, not 'big name' players.
As for the rest, 90% of all media football transfer stories - whether from "well-respected" journalists and media outlets or not - are rubbish. They mainly write to attract attention - because that's the core of their job.
I disagree with the bolded bit. You don't become a truly great team without buying star players. Look at Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern or some of the great United teams under Fergie. These teams all have/had star players that were bought for big money. You refer to the Alli's and Diers of this world but that situation is incomparable. You can't just look at the expected impact on the pitch and compare that directly to the difference in price. That's not how the transfer market operates. Pogba is a key player in a side that has won 4 Serie A titles and reached the Champions League final. You have to pay massively over the odds for such a player, that has always been the case.Is has had an effect on prices, yes, but nothing like as much as to account for £100m for Pogba. £100m! Plus vast wages! For a player who will be lucky to have even a third of the impact of someone like Bale or Modric.
And of course Dier and Allie were unproven, but that still doesn't account for the huge discrepancy between £9m for the pair of them and the idea of more than 10 times that amount for Pogba. I could realistically speculate that, right now, out there somewhere, are several young CMs who will be better than Pogba and obtainable, if only they could be found, for relative peanuts. The morale of this story? Invest in scouting, not 'big name' players.
As for the rest, 90% of all media football transfer stories - whether from "well-respected" journalists and media outlets or not - are rubbish. They mainly write to attract attention - because that's the core of their job.
Uncle P should have his own show on MUTV... The Paddy Evra showDamn I miss Paddy. What a legend!
The good old "[so and so] has told close friends"...
Why do opposition fans care so much what we were spend on the players?
It's not like we are Leeds United throwing money around without a plan. We actually have a former investment banker in charge of us. Having worked in a bank myself,you simply don't make this kind of big investments without a lot of feasibility studies.
This same bunch was cheering on as Madrid signed Ronaldo for 80 mil which has played a huge part in this football inflation we are now. They were mocking us for overspending on Martial. Look how that turned out.
Glaston is best ignored.Lovely to watch Glaston trying to convince himself that us spending anything will be our downfall, and it's so sweet to see how much he cares about our finances. Looking at his insight into our finances, maybe he should be councelling our board and financial department, as he might warn them that spending more on a player than his entire club is worth will destroy our club.
Why didnt they care when everyone else was?Because we are inflating the market.
Why didnt they care when everyone else was?
Like Madrid for example. They loved the Ronaldo sale .