Scandi Red
Hates Music.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2022
- Messages
- 6,278
60 pages on player who left more than a year ago and has been injured most of that time? Even with the failed drug test topic that's a lot!
He did while they were here. And he was a better player for us than Zlatan was.He couldn't lace Zlatan shoes. To even put them in same sentence is laughable.
Pogba was very good at one thing. That was promoting him self on social media. Just like Lingard tried. As a football player, he was average. If even that. 1 good game, 20 bad games. 1 good season, 7 bad seasons.
He wasn't one of their best players, and for the most part didn't play a bit role. He went missing for quite a lot of that world cup playing for the big favourite.Silly post. Why could you not put them in the same sentence, and why is it laughable? Pogba is a world cup winner, being one of their best players and playing a huge role. If you think his football abilities are average, then you don't really know much about football. Putting up attacking midfielder numbers as a deep lying playmaker is not as bad as you make it out to be (particularly when you understand that he isn't a deep lying playmaker, and we should not have played him as one).
What does "one of the best" even mean? It's vague.If you can't accept that Rashford has been one of our best players since his debut, then that is on you.
Pogba was France's best player during their World Cup win.He went missing for quite a lot of that world cup playing for the big favourite.
From 2016-2023, Rashford has been one of United's best players. Arguably the best, though certainly top 3. De Gea was very good until 2018. Pogba until 2019. Bruno and Shaw have been the only other players of any real note.What does "one of the best" even mean? It's vague.
Pogba was nowhere near their best player, during the world cup he was criticised and there was talk about him being dropped. The final was described as him proving people wrong since the rest of the tournament was not good for him.Pogba was France's best player during their World Cup win.
From 2016-2023, Rashford has been one of United's best players. Arguably the best, though certainly top 2. De Gea was very good until 2018. Pogba until 2019. Bruno and Shaw have been the only other players of any real note.
Pogba was nowhere near their best player, during the world cup he was criticised and there was talk about him being dropped. The final was described as him proving people wrong since the rest of the tournament was not good for him.
De Gea was better, Pogba was better, ibrahimovic, Herrera, Carrick, Shaw, Bruno, Martinez, Varane, Greenwood, Garnacho have all been better than him off the top of my head.
You are completely misremembering with regards to Pogba. There was some talk prior to the tournament of him being dropped for Payet. Yet he wasn't and he was their best player throughout the competition.Pogba was nowhere near their best player, during the world cup he was criticised and there was talk about him being dropped. The final was described as him proving people wrong since the rest of the tournament was not good for him.
De Gea was better, Pogba was better, ibrahimovic, Herrera, Carrick, Shaw, Bruno, Martinez, Varane, Greenwood, Garnacho have all been better than him off the top of my head.
He wasn't one of their best players, and for the most part didn't play a bit role. He went missing for quite a lot of that world cup playing for the big favourite.
He's almost certainly in gross misconduct of his contract, so Juventus don't have to pay him anything. I've just googled it too and it looks like he's entitled to the minimum the football's union offers (which is allegedly a measly £2k a month). Unless he's miraculously found innocent, he won't be getting any further monies than that.Does he still get paid a salary being banned from playing?
Makes sense if there is a misconduct section in there on these kind of contracts. That 2k is pocket change for him, but perhaps important for the lesser players I guess.He's almost certainly in gross misconduct of his contract, so Juventus don't have to pay him anything. I've just googled it too and it looks like he's entitled to the minimum the football's union offers (which is allegedly a measly £2k a month). Unless he's miraculously found innocent, he won't be getting any further monies than that.
This. All the talk about how he needed two DMs behind him to unlock him was exhausting. Plus, Raiola being his mouthpiece and speaking to the press about how Pogba was likely to leave United on the eve before some of our most important games, really left a sour taste in the mouth.I think the people who idolise Pogba on here are clearly young fans who missed our peak years under Ferguson. I mean, if playing one world class pass every 10 games impresses you, imagine what you'd be like if you saw Paul Scholes.
Pogba wasn't playing for a league one team, he was in the top 4-6 clubs in the country, and he couldn't produce. Shame, but we move on.
I think that's a bit harsh on Pogba pre-injuries. His inconsistency during his first four years here was significantly exaggerated. I'm certainly not saying he wasn't inconsistently (he definitely was), but the sad thing was that he was actually our most consistent player during those four years. Admittedly that was more about how bad everyone else was, but that doesn't stop it being true. The combination of everyone simply having higher expectations on him than anyone else plus some of the over-the-top media criticism just quite unfairly made him the face of the issues.If you look at the whole package, you’ll realise Rashford offers next to nothing when he’s not in one of his 10-15 games per season hot streak.
And it’s the same with Pogba, they can look great on their day, and absolute garbage when they’re not in form. The biggest problem is that they’re far more often out of form than in form. Trying to argue otherwise is insane.
He wasn't one of their best players, and for the most part didn't play a bit role. He went missing for quite a lot of that world cup playing for the big favourite.
Pogba was nowhere near their best player, during the world cup he was criticised and there was talk about him being dropped. The final was described as him proving people wrong since the rest of the tournament was not good for him.
That doesn't make much sense, a player in his position should have those type of stats, especially when playing for by far the best team.People just lie on Pogba's name like it's a full-time job. We kept the files though:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-to-dominator-paul-pogbas-world-cup-evolution
Yes, by a substantial amount of metrics, he was indeed France's best player at the world cup. Reality > fanfiction.
Garnacho lately has literally pushed Rashford out of his best position.You are completely misremembering with regards to Pogba. There was some talk prior to the tournament of him being dropped for Payet. Yet he wasn't and he was their best player throughout the competition.
This is just flat out wrong. What on Earth has Garnacho done in his very short time that outweighs 7 years of Rashford? Some of those other players have only had one good season here.
They play together now.Martinez wasn't even there at the same time was he?
So any player that played in that position for France would have those stats is what you're saying?That doesn't make much sense, a player in his position should have those type of stats, especially when playing for by far the best team.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...-pogba-manchseter-united-record-a8448786.html
That doesn't make much sense, a player in his position should have those type of stats, especially when playing for by far the best team.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...-pogba-manchseter-united-record-a8448786.html
Ah, so that means he has contributed more for Manchester United than Rashford since 2016. Good to know.Garnacho lately has literally pushed Rashford out of his best position.
You are completely misremembering with regards to Pogba. There was some talk prior to the tournament of him being dropped for Payet. Yet he wasn't and he was their best player throughout the competition.
This is just flat out wrong. What on Earth has Garnacho done in his very short time that outweighs 7 years of Rashford? Some of those other players have only had one good season here.
He definitely wasn't their best player "throughout the competition". He didn't show up until the knockout games and considering this is the same tournament where Mbappe became a star it's rather odd to claim Pogba was the best player in the same team.
I do remember him being very good in the knockout rounds but I also don't get how you can base a player's pedigree off 4 games. He certainly could have been a great player if he could have stayed focused on being one for more than about 5 minutes, but world cup Pogba on average showed up about once every 2 months.
The idea he was a better player for United than Zlatan is just laughable. Maybe if you condensed all of Pogba's good performances for United over 5 years into one season, and ignored/deleted the 3x as many bad ones, you'd get close to it being a fair shout, but then that's the same as pretending you're rich by adding up your life earnings and just not counting any time you have to spend money. It's a nice lie but unfortunately it probably isn't going to help you get a mortgage.
Zlatan was instrumental in United's only remotely successful season post SAF. Pogba was instrumental in getting 2 managers the sack, and arguably his most positive contribution was causing Graem Souness to come across as suspiciously racist.
Obviously, it pains me to agree with Jose Mourinho about anything but I do think he was on to something about how you’ll only ever get the best of Pogba at a tournament like the World Cup. No distractions and only needing to stay fully focused and motivated for a short period of time. Very different to the level of professionalism needed to be an asset for his club over a long season.
That's not an issue at allEven at that world cup he decided to take the entire team out for a hair cut or something equally ridiculous if I remember rightly.
I don't think our managers or a lot of our fans ever really got their head around what Paul Pogba was or how he fits into a team, which imo is as a luxury player/someone who can offer a bit extra that other players can't, as opposed to some kind of talisman or driving force to build a team around. Or maybe they did get their head around it but had one hand tied by the club.
I thought Mourinho was often right about things tbh, the problem was 90% of it was just him explaining why we were shite, so not really all that useful when he was the manager.
Think Ozil was another that was absolutely reliant on those around him.Talented player, their best form was for Juventus next to Pirlo and Marchisio and then with France with Kante and Matuidi.
No player can do it by themselves, but no player needed a perfect set-up around them quite as obviously as Pogba did.
Yeah I thought that was a bit of a weird thing to point out. Hair has been an important thing for him and it might have been a good team-bonding moment.That's not an issue at all
Redcafe's average player rating in 16/17:The idea he was a better player for United than Zlatan is just laughable. Maybe if you condensed all of Pogba's good performances for United over 5 years into one season, and ignored/deleted the 3x as many bad ones, you'd get close to it being a fair shout, but then that's the same as pretending you're rich by adding up your life earnings and just not counting any time you have to spend money. It's a nice lie but unfortunately it probably isn't going to help you get a mortgage.
Zlatan was instrumental in United's only remotely successful season post SAF. Pogba was instrumental in getting 2 managers the sack, and arguably his most positive contribution was causing Graem Souness to come across as suspiciously racist.
There is always that youtube compilation of all the assists Pogba could have had if Zlatan and Co finished betterRedcafe's average player rating in 16/17:
Pogba 6.3
Zlatan 6.2
Zlatan's 16/17 is as overrated these days as Pogba's is underrated. In reality they both had periods during the year where they struggled, but overall they were both fairly good without being great. There was very little between them either way. Pogba then continued at a similar level for another three seasons before then completely falling apart in his last two seasons here.
Redcafe's average player rating in 16/17:
Pogba 6.3
Zlatan 6.2
Zlatan's 16/17 is as overrated these days as Pogba's is underrated. In reality they both had periods during the year where they struggled, but overall they were both fairly good without being great. There was very little between them either way. Pogba then continued at a similar level for another three seasons before then completely falling apart in his last two seasons here.
Yeah. I would rather he takes the team out for something enjoyable like getting haircuts than, for example, going out on the piss.Yeah I thought that was a bit of a weird thing to point out. Hair has been an important thing for him and it might have been a good team-bonding moment.
Pogba's performances are underrated, at least in his first four seasons. As seen by you saying he had three times the amount of bad matches as good, and that you'd have to take all of his good performances over five years to get close to how Zlatan was in 16/17. In reality he had a similar amount of good and bad matches, which obviously is nowhere near good enough but name one player in the squad who had a higher percentage of good during that period. Probably De Gea, but even he was only good for 16/17 and 17/18, before being average for most of 18/19 then being absolutely terrible at the end of that season and all of 19/20.Give it up mate. Pogba underrated is a new one even on here. He's probably the most overated player ever on redcafe (With the exception of nearly every player the caf compares Rashford to).
He definitely didn't continue at a similar level for another 3 years. He was good for about the first 2 games of the next season. By half way through he was bad enough for there to be mammoth threads on here blaming his crapness on Mourinho playing him in slightly the wrong part of the midfield. Then the season after his behaving like a bellend was instrumental in us being absolutely terrible and sacking our manager.
Apart from the constant being a liability, lack of ability to concentrate, repeated using of social media to sh*t stir within his own club, voodoo cursing of own team mates, failed drugs tests, and association with violent criminal gangs, I guess he was a decent player.
You're not going to win this man.Give it up mate. Pogba underrated is a new one even on here. He's probably the most overated player ever on redcafe (With the exception of nearly every player the caf compares Rashford to).
He definitely didn't continue at a similar level for another 3 years. He was good for about the first 2 games of the next season. By half way through he was bad enough for there to be mammoth threads on here blaming his crapness on Mourinho playing him in slightly the wrong part of the midfield. Then the season after his behaving like a bellend was instrumental in us being absolutely terrible and sacking our manager.
Apart from the constant being a liability, lack of ability to concentrate, repeated using of social media to sh*t stir within his own club, voodoo cursing of own team mates, failed drugs tests, and association with violent criminal gangs, I guess he was a decent player.
To add further, he was our only recognized midfield signing which was neglected for god knows how long. Schmidfield was a scam.You're not going to win this man.
At the time, many of us were complaining about how many chances Zlatan was missing from Pogba's passes. Pogba was never overrated on here. People understood he was one of our better players, but many thought he should carry us because of his price tag. And maybe not even carry, but they expected more consistency. That's fair enough, but regardless of expectations he was still one of our better players when he actually did play over the course of a season. Other players that are not as talented, didn't get as much slack because they're not as talented, didn't cost much, and weren't being payed as much. However, that's a separate discussion from who is objectively putting in better performances, not just a who is playing better relative to price tag, wages, and talent.
Use your eyes to form your own opinion.I'll go by standard FIFA stats and awards: