To be fair, he isn’t a one man solution to our issues on the ball. Far from it. But he clearly improved us on the ball. So choosing posts where people say that we miss him to try to downplay any improvement he might give us on the basis that it is not the only improvement we need is - dunno, can’t even think of the word. ‘Mischievous’? ‘Agenda-ish’? ‘Odd’?
I don’t think anyone has come here to say we’ll be the league’s strongest team if PP was here. We’ve said the team misses him, and there has been a rush from a few to basically say that it doesn’t matter, because the team needs more than just Pogba. Which is true, but why the desire to discredit? If we need another 30% and PP only gives us 10% of that, is it not true that we need him back? But for some, any conversation about that 10% just triggers the reaction for them to bang on about the other 20, to basically quickly balance any assertion that we miss Pogba.
As you said, the problems run deeper. But unless you see yourself on the ‘other side’ needing to make a counter-argument - why would that be what you are drawn to say? And why is there a need to try and counter in the first place? It’s not offensive to say the team needs Pogba back, only if that offends you!
We shouldn’t need this situation where people feel a pro-Pogba statement needs to be ‘balanced’ all the time. We should really just be looking at the team. This isn’t a competition, Pogba is a United player!