So he's good but not better than very very good and inconsistent. Would you want him starting in our midfield then? Just curious because if you say yes then standards have clearly fallen from the quality of midfielders we have had when we were where we want to be. Title winning midfielders have always been very good and consistent. Consistent and good at the very least.
Would you want him starting in our midfield?
It depends on our midfield options, on the balance of our midfield, the qualities/weaknesses of the other players and form. I didn't want Pogba at United in 2016 because in my opinion he wasn't what we needed, Pogba has always been a secondary player in his roles, he is a secondary playmaker and a secondary "defender" in midfield, if you don't have the primary playmakers/defenders then I don't want Pogba in my midfield because there is no role that he can occupy with consistency.
Have the standards fallen?
Which standards are we talking about? Sir Bobby Charlton was considerably better than Robbo who was himself better than almost everyone that followed him bar maybe Keane. Football has changed, there is a larger emphasis on complementarity and collective strength than individual prowesses. Also United place in football has changed since SAF retired. You shouldn't judge a player based on nostalgia but on what is on offer today.
Title winning midfielders?
Pogba has won titles and been good enough for CL contenders like Juventus or World Cup champions like France. The issue isn't Pogba in isolation but the entire team since 2013, we have been unbalanced and inconsistent with and without Pogba, collectively we haven't been a title winning team while Pogba has been contending for titles within other teams. The reality is that few players are actually consistent, most of the time they are inconsistent but it doesn't matter because the team as a whole is able to cover and compensate, that's probably the biggest problem at United since 2013, the club's results rely entirely on 1 or 2 players being consistent instead of relying on 14-15 players artificially providing consistency. That's why SAF had that many strikers or why we had at the same time Scholes, Carrick, Hargreaves and Fletcher in 2008 in our prime. Not being a guaranteed starter in a great team doesn't mean that you are not good enough, would you say that Butt and Scholes weren't good enough in 97-00, would you say that for Fletcher and Carrick?
Now the fact that Pogba isn't one of these consistent player, is why he was never a world record fee and why the club shouldn't lose sleep on the idea of losing him. While he can be valuable in a balanced team, his absence doesn't make or break the team.