NoLogo
Full Member
been saying it for quite a bit. I think he suits a deeper role better
Exactly. He isn't a 10. Also the double pivot with him and Matic worked really great so far, why break it up?
been saying it for quite a bit. I think he suits a deeper role better
Exactly. He isn't a 10. Also the double pivot with him and Matic worked really great so far, why break it up?
Perhaps because Stoke are better than Swansea who didn't even have a proper striker against us.
"PoGbA wAs TeRrIbLe"
Yeah he played excellent because some stats told me so
Nah he was utter shit today mate
"PoGbA wAs TeRrIbLe"
Had a quiet game I thought, it's hard to argue thast on the ball he's better when starting deeper, I just think Jose worries about him defensively in a 2 away from home.
The idea of pushing Pogba upfront by playing 4-3-3 is obviously the wrong one. He's not the kind of player who can play under the striker or too farther up front. Allegri tried to play him as a number 10 before and failed. Pogba is at his best as an all round CM who plays deep and uses his long balls while going forward only when an opportunity arises to shoot or scores like he used to do in the previous 3 games. He shouldn't be our playmaker, but should have a number 10 in front of him while he's assisting the attack with his contributions.
His combination with Matic and Mikhi was much, much better than what we saw today. All the 3 knew their role quite well, Matic securing the midfield, Pogba pushing the ball forward and Mikhi creating the play. With Herrera and Matic it looks like a mess. Herrera interfering with Matic roles and Pogba is main creator from the middle of the field while Mikhi is wasted on the right flank doing nothing and the result is what we saw : non-creative and predictable play style depending on long balls and our useless flanks, because Pogba was assigned to be our playmaker while he really isn't.
We should revert back to our system starting next match and never change it except against Top 6 teams. Pogba is combining better with Matic and Mikhi in the middle because everyone of them knows his role in it and doing it flawlessly.
The teams we played before stoke never attacked and parked the bus , A 2 man pivot has to work defensively effectively against 3 man mid attacking teams but pogba's positional sense and defensive responsiblities is average to form a effective defensive block and matic is not 25 anymore as wwell like he was under first mourihno season. So its because of pogba's lack of defensive responsibilty and lack of basics a 2 man mid will get dominated against teams who play to attack and defend very resolutely without giving space to a no 10 because our transition form defense to attack is not quick enough.
And he's not wrong. Even in mid 3 today he was defensively vunrable.
We had 2 defensive midfielders behind him today, Matic and Herrera. How can I criticize him for defensive duties in a setup like this ? The setup today was made for the sole reason to make Pogba roam freely upfront while he's covered by both Herrera and Matic. Also Stoke wasn't even targeting the midfield or tried to possess the ball anyway they were always aiming to make long balls on the flanks to expose our weaknesses there.
Pogba isn't great defensively but him ( and Mikhi ) did their defensive duties fine whenever we play in 2 men midfield. We're not supposed to get dominated in the midfield. It's the opposite. We'll be the one dominating the field most of times and attacking most of the game so talking about Pogba defensive abilities and us forced to play with 3 men midfield to unleash his best is pointless IMO and only applicable against big teams. We heard that a lot since he arrived and yet I'm struggling to remember a great attacking game he did while we played with 4-3-3, while he always does very well offensively in 2 men midfield when his site is to push the ball forward, assist in the build up of the attack and doing his long passes. When he's pushed forward more his decision making problems become more exposed because all the attacking build up lay on him.
The only we can play a proper 4-3-3 is if we have a tempo controlling midfield beside Matic and Pogba. Some one who keeps possession of the ball, controlling the tempo of the game and calming everyone beside him while we're attacking. Kroos is the perfect example for this. He controls the tempo of the game, keeps possession and helps in the attack by his throughs and shots. Herrera roles are very similar to Matic, interfering with him and moving in the positions he move in while leaving all the attacking buildup on Pogba alone who isn't capable of it.
4-3-3 isn't suited to our current side tbh. We don't have the controlling midfield, the fullbacks or the RW to apply it efficiently. The main advantage 4-2-3-1 has is all of our players know their roles in it and doing it exactly, resulting in overall better performance from most if not everyone.
I never felt we were vulnerable today bar the brainfarts of the 2 CB's at times, I think Pogba has struggled to affect games when playing in the midfield 3 recently, looking more at ease a bit deeper, we couldn't put a lot of rythym together today with him seeing so little of the ball.
Any defensive freedom is not complete freedom, it depends on which half of the pitch you are. If the opponent is in attacking mode in your half you dont get the defensive freedom , to not drop deep or to not press effectively and cut the passing lines so that the opponents is not allowed to pass the ball forward. It results in the attacking team make forward pass and reach your final third.
You only get defensive freedom in the opponents half when you are on the attack and have just lost the ball , that you dont have to track back to control the counter attack for the fear of getting exposed as there are 2 men behind to control the counter attack or delay to opponents the direct route to goal, and if the players in behind win the ball they can launch a quick direct pass to the free cm and he can recive a quick pass in space which opens up because the opponents were on the counter and just lost the ball, and build on the attack in final third temporarily transiting to a 4231 with the link between attack and midfeild as the opponents are slower in transition from attack to defense. This is the main concept here.
You have to defend as a 433 off the ball in your own half at all times, with each Midfeilder doing his job as the second line of defense ,because you are not pressing the opponents high in their own half who build out from the back. You only get defensive freedom in opponents half and its the remaining 2 players role to press and control.
What you're talking about is applicable if we're playing with two attacking minded midfielders with a DMF behind them, this these 2 attacking minded players must have defensive duties, as Madrid, but that's not applicable to us because we play the 4-3-3 with 2 DMFs ( Herrera and Matic ) with one attacking player ( Pogba ) so it looks pointless to talk about Pogba defensive duties in such a setup that is built alone to push him forward as much as possible. That's why our version of 4-3-3 is the worst I have seen and not balanced at all. You're giving him too much criticism for that first goal even though his role in it is minor. The major fault lies in the Bailly fecking up the offside trap and losing his man. Pogba could have pressed Fletcher but it's a minor thing and it's not his major fault. You're looking for perfection, which isn't applicable.
I dont know how you reached that conclusion because until now we never faced any team who would attack with impunity and build from the back like stoke did. Its not the opposite. I dont think matic and herrera can afford to press that high proactively against teams who build from the back, to disrupt their midfeild play as our attackers dont press in the oppnents half that aggressively( like we did against chelsea at home last season to deny them having the high line attacking mode) so they will get exposed against a mid 3 as they have a man advantage with width with wingbacks or over lapping full backs.
Until now the teams never attacked us like stoke did, and even in mid 3 pogba's lack of agressive pressing and positional dicipline led to that fletcher pass forward which eventually resulted in a goal from mistakes from bailly and darmian too. When the second line of defense fails the last line of defense has to stop the threat and we dint.
Stoke away is not a easy game. Any result was possible here including a loss.
We scored late goals against west ham swansea and leicester in a mid 3 only and stuggled to break down all of them until the game opened up with a goal in a mid 2 also. Pogba's goal against west ham and swansea came in mid 3. When stoke were settling for a draw after their equalizer and dropped deep and we switched to a 4231 we could not fashion out a decent chance and we never could go in a full attacking mode. lukaku was a difficult chance too. so we dint find much penetration in a 4231 with stoke gong on defensive.
Again, we're the team supposed to dominate the midfield and attack in most of the games not the opposite. We won't face opponents who try to dominate us except the top teams, but the majority of the league games will be against teams parking the bus and defending. Stoke isn't exception because they dominated nothing and never tried to attack through the middle, I stead they were throwing long balls to the flanks and our defensive capabilities made them look as if they're attacking or dominating. Well they aren't. We have been any good defensively on the flanks you wouldn't have noticed them as the previous 3 games.
Since the majority of the games we'll the team needing to dominate and attack, we should be talking the formation suited for this not the minority of the top games we'll be on our toes, and the question here is what does this 4-3-3 brought us any offensively ? It demolishes our attacking build up from the midfield forcing us to go wide where our useless full backs are playing, leaves Lukaku isolated alone, and plays Mikhi out of his position. Even defensively it doesn't make us any solid as expected tbh. We were vulnerable today and also against Madrid in Super Cup. It's not like we were more solid with it than without it. We changed to 4-2-3-1 at the last 15 minutes of Stoke game and I hardly noticed any difference or more vulnerability in the midfield because of this.
Games with top teams got their own formations and special tactics, and Stoke is definitely not a big game, tricky but not big one. You need to realize that other teams are the ones who should change their formation to contain us, not us who should change our formations to play against likes of Stoke.
Regarding the previous games, I also don't find a relation between the goals and us changing to 4-3-3 in the last 15 minutes. In WHU we were already 2-0 up and the last 2 goals were a team play between Pogba, Martial and Mikhi, and a shot from Pogba. In Swansea game it was 3 direct counters executed perfectly. We did the hard job opening these games up first using 4-2-3-1, while using 4-3-3 to kill the game, not the opposite. Opening the game first is much harder of course.
Matic is that midfeild controller for us when we are on the offensive with the ball and that player who breaks up the play proactively unlike a old carrick who does break up play but re actively, Now its pogba's job to be that second one and define that role he needs to be playing when the going gets tough. If pogba is not capable of the only role he has to do in the team than what does he brings in as a midfeider? Herrera was lacking that energy and tenacity today but largely he does his job of breaking up the play and passing well he is is on the ball although he needs to improve on the ball as well. But he rarely loose the ball and has that intelligence to make that final pass too. Pogba is supposed to be a play maker in a 433 if he is not capable of it than what did we pay 89 m for?
Matic is calm on the ball and builds up the play well from the back but he's not Kroos. I gave a clear example of the type of the midfielder we lacks to apply the 3 man midfield efficiently. Madrid is playing with a DMF and in front of him 2 attacking minded players, one of them controlling the tempo of the game. We're playing it with a DMF, a b2b used to play as a DMF and one attacking minded player. It's different build up and it's clear which one we lack.
Pogba being priced at 89m doesn't mean he's Superman or should do a role he can't. He's not a number 10 and not a direct playmaker who can play behind the striker. You can't give him the whole attacking buildup of the midfield and tell him that he's 89m and you should do it! Pogba is an offensive minded CM who pushes the ball forward and aid in the attacking buildup, he must have another creative player to aid him, either a number 10 or another offensively minded midfielder. That's why he's much better going forward in 2 men midfield with us. He's assigned to the role of pushing the ball forward and has Mikhi in front of him to aid in attacking build up and creating chances.
Forcing a single player to create everything from the midfield then expecting results isn't gonna work. Not to mention the opponent will know exactly what you're trying and surround him with defenders easily. If you have 2 creative choices to create chances from the middle to gives you more predictability and less defenders to worry about, as in Madrid.
Yeah i agree we lack creativity on the RW because Mkh sruggles as a winger. But we have brought in as a winger to play on the right primirarily as we let go sadio mane for him, which was a incredibly dumb decision So he has to work harder a lot to fit in that role now. He can ocassionaly drift in as a cam to build up the counter.
It was a bad decision if we bought him for the wing but we needed a playmaker anyway as Mata is getting older and his productivity is decreasing.
The fact that we are not comfortable against top 6 in a 4231 is only the testament that the 2 man pivot midfeild will fail against top quality Posession based attacking sides which we will find in ucl too and against top 6 who largely play a wing back system themselves , so we will have to play in a mid 3 a lot, and then Mkh or lingard has to slot in there as rw because of mata's inability to take the ball from defense to attack. And thus Pogba needs to improve both on and off the ball because he is the one who constantly falls short when the going gets tough, not herrera and not matic.
As I told you, big games have their special formations with their special tactics. We should be talking our formation in the majority of the games when we'll be the dominant side not the opposite. Anyway, didn't we try this 4-3-3 against Madrid and failed miserably to do anything with their midfield ?
Don't get me wrong 4-3-3 is a very strong formation when applied correctly. The point is we don't have the tools needed to play it at all, in midfield and width, even our striker can't be left isolated without someone near him. This formation isn't for us. This side is built to play the 4-2-3-1. Even 4-4-2 won't work with this side with our crap width. I can the diamond formation working, though, if Shaw restored his fitness ( doubtful ), Zlatan is back and we bought a tempo controlling midfielder, but with the current tools we have, the formation that puts each player in just position with his best role is 4-2-3-1
Bit worrying that Stoke identified him as a weakness prior to the game.
http://www.football365.com/news/adam-stoke-identified-pogba-as-man-uniteds-weakness
“We felt we could punish United at the sides of Pogba and Matic,” Adam told BT Sport.
“Pogba is a world class player but at times he gets attracted to the ball and you can get the opposite side of him.
“At times we tried that but United are a top side and we had to work hard for that.
“He’s obviously a top player but if you can get to the side of him, Matic is isolated. At times we cause them problems.
“We have to respect them and they caused us problems too but we deserved a draw in the end I think.”
His positional sense is average top a top midfeilder with skills. He fails to do the basics of the game right.
Every game has 2 aspects of the game, on the ball and off the ball, and pogba is average off the ball Positioning and lethargic in pressing against attacking teams.
Even for today's first goal Pogba being a second line of defense needed to press closer to fletcher in order to make him pass the ball sideways and not forwards and his lack of effective pressing meant fletcher had time and space to pick his pass for the player in space and darmian was slower to close him down effectively.
Pogba fails to control the midfeild against attacking teams and fails to do the basics right many many times.
"PoGbA wAs TeRrIbLe"
You defend as a team and attack as a team. Pogba was the second line of defense and failed to press fletcher for that pass to deny him a forward pass. Cb's are a 3rd line of defense who have to reactively defend when 2nd line of defense fails.