Hammondo
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
- Messages
- 9,429
I agree, he just seems a bit overpriced.That stands out from the clips too. We need physically imposing players who will help us not get outrun against nearly every PL team.
I agree, he just seems a bit overpriced.That stands out from the clips too. We need physically imposing players who will help us not get outrun against nearly every PL team.
Proven? Well 80mil thank you£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
To who? Do you think you're getting a top class, proven wing back for £30m?£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
Tell this to City who just signed two lesser known centerbacks for similar money. 30m is the normal price for those kind of players, but the question is whether they bring the right profile and Dorgu seems to be okay.£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
That’s the market since a while now I’m afraid£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
Exactly. £30 million is like £10-15 million from 10-20 years ago.Tell this to City who just signed two lesser known centerbacks for similar money. 30m is the normal price for those kind of players, but the question is whether they bring the right profile and Dorgu seems to be okay.
No. We sold Elanga for £15m and this deal should be in the same ballpark.Exactly. £30 million is like £10-15 million from 10-20 years ago.
It’s considered a punt.
And we are notoriously bad at selling players.No. We sold Elanga for £15m and this deal should be in the same ballpark.
And buying players.And we are notoriously bad at selling players.
We have a completely different recruitment team so equating a sale like Elanga to the guys running things now makes no sense at all.And buying players.
Where have you plucked that arbitrary figure from?Put it this way: what are the chances of him turning out to be good enough for us? Let's assume odds of 30%.
If you pay £30m, then you're effectively paying around £90m to fill the position, taking into account the chance of success.
this is interesting maths to say to the leastPut it this way: what are the chances of him turning out to be good enough for us? Let's assume odds of 30%.
If you pay £30m, then you're effectively paying around £90m to fill the position, taking into account the chance of success.
You have to take a probabilistic approach to transfer dealings.
A best guess. What odds would you put on it?Where have you plucked that arbitrary figure from?
Indeed.this is interesting maths to say to the least
We should start including them in contracts. If you have a 30% increase in performance each season you get an extra 30k a week.Indeed.
I'd probably start by basing it on the success rate of the current regime, which is tricky as there is not much data available to make an accurate assessment.A best guess. What odds would you put on it?
No. We sold Elanga for £15m and this deal should be in the same ballpark.
Even with the best scouting and transfer team in the world, I doubt you ever get much better odds than 50% when buying young unproven talents.I'd probably start by basing it on the success rate of the current regime, which is tricky as there is not much data available to make an accurate assessment.
Put it this way: what are the chances of him turning out to be good enough for us? Let's assume odds of 30%.
If you pay £30m, then you're effectively paying around £90m to fill the position, taking into account the chance of success.
You have to take a probabilistic approach to transfer dealings.
We spent that on Amad after about 200mins of 1st team action for Atalanta...£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
Lecce definitely want to sell at some point. They've never sold a player for more than €20m (£17m).How are these the same?
Man Utd actively wanted to sell a fringe squad player who played enough to demonstrate he wasn't good enough to play for them.
Lecce won't want to sell a key player who potentially may be good enough for United.
£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
All we have to go on for now is:Even with the best scouting and transfer team in the world, I doubt you ever get much better odds than 50% when buying young unproven talents.
Is it, though? Granted, lots of club are willing to make disproportionate offers due to desperation, developing tunnel-vision or lack of feasible alternatives in the mercato, which inflates transfer business (Manchester United itself is a major culprit in this inflation, which has unfortunately caught up with us even though the club is a proverbial money-minting machine).That’s the market since a while now I’m afraid
Spot on. Why do so many people on here want us to spaff our (very limited) transfer funds up the wall yet AGAIN?Is it, though? Granted, lots of club are willing to make disproportionate offers due to desperation, developing tunnel-vision or lack of feasible alternatives in the mercato, which inflates transfer business (Manchester United itself is a major culprit in this inflation, which has unfortunately caught up with us even though the club is a proverbial money-minting machine).
But three of the very best 3—4—2—1 teams in club football have managed to acquire starting quality wingbacks in recent years for eminently reasonable sums of money. Which does give us a half-decent frame of reference, in a roundabout way (in terms of the possibilities in the mercato, if we're astute enough and cast a wide enough net).
Others who cost half as much as what Lecce are demanding, over the last half-decade or so (transfer fees haven't risen exponentially in this time-frame): Théo Hernandez to Milan, Alphonso Davies to Bayern Munich, Rayan Aït-Nouri to Wolverhampton, Destiny Udogie to Tottenham, Milos Kerkez to Bournemouth, and so on and so forth.
- Free transfer: Alejandro Grimaldo to Bayer Leverkusen.
- €20 million: Raoul Bellanova to Atalanta.
- €11 million: Jeremie Frimpong to Bayer Leverkusen.
- €7 million: cost of Federico Dimarco's return to Internazionale.
Asking for a bit of financial prudence and restraint from Manchester United, when the player in question is by no means a standout talent (to merit such a significant outlay) and we have limited spending capabilities, isn't exactly out of order.
Lecce definitely want to sell at some point. They've never sold a player for more than €20m (£17m).
Is he twice as good as any other player to ever play for the club?
For £30 million or more lets say 6 or 7 goal involvements in his 12 matches in attacking positions. So a couple more.
£30 million shouldnt be spent unless its a standout player. If he's coming in for £18 million its another story.
Dwight McNeil has 6 in 13 for Everton who have scored 18 and are 16th placed. I dont really want us to sign him either but thats an example of player at a club in a similar position also being picked on the wing and having more than 4 goal involvements in 12 or 1 in 3.
Can you see why signing a player who mostly plays as a winger this season and doesnt have a lot of goals and assists might be a concern when weve only scored 27 goals ourselves this season? We've also wasted a huge amount of money. Is there something wrong with wanting that cycle to stop?
I'd rather Isak than 2.5 Elliot Andersons.And if they do it will be for a lot of money because he's a key part of their team and a player with high potential.
The second point is absolute nonsense logic, what are you even on about? Newcastle's record sale was Elliott Anderson to Forest this summer - does that mean Isak can't possibly be worth £87.5m because he's not literally 2.5x better than Anderson? A club's player sale history has absolutely no barely on a current player's value.
In an ideal world, maybe. But us selling someone and a team like Lecce selling someone are 2 different things, people are never going to pay through the nose for cast offs from big clubs, we're the only mugs that do it. That's before you even take into account things like wages.No. We sold Elanga for £15m and this deal should be in the same ballpark.
£30 million is madness for an unproven player . Move on.
Is it, though? Granted, lots of club are willing to make disproportionate offers due to desperation, developing tunnel-vision or lack of feasible alternatives in the mercato, which inflates transfer business (Manchester United itself is a major culprit in this inflation, which has unfortunately caught up with us even though the club is a proverbial money-minting machine).
But three of the very best 3—4—2—1 teams in club football have managed to acquire starting quality wingbacks in recent years for eminently reasonable sums of money. Which does give us a half-decent frame of reference, in a roundabout way (in terms of the possibilities in the mercato, if we're astute enough and cast a wide enough net).
Others who cost half as much as what Lecce are demanding, over the last half-decade or so (transfer fees haven't risen exponentially in this time-frame): Théo Hernandez to Milan, Alphonso Davies to Bayern Munich, Rayan Aït-Nouri to Wolverhampton, Destiny Udogie to Tottenham, Milos Kerkez to Bournemouth, and so on and so forth.
- Free transfer: Alejandro Grimaldo to Bayer Leverkusen.
- €20 million: Raoul Bellanova to Atalanta.
- €11 million: Jeremie Frimpong to Bayer Leverkusen.
- €7 million: cost of Federico Dimarco's return to Internazionale.
Asking for a bit of financial prudence and restraint from Manchester United, when the player in question is by no means a standout talent (to merit such a significant outlay) and we have limited spending capabilities, isn't exactly out of order.