Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 13,083
Just discuss the topic, don't be boring with your silly and meaningless responses.I wasn’t insulting you, I was criticising the line of thinking, don’t be so sensitive.
Danes are useless. Remember that dud Schmeichel. Wozniak kicks up a racket and disappoints. As for Hans Christian Anderson…Is Eriksen nothing to you?
Not sure he's weakening your point
Nice oneThe Ornacle
Financial context is important though.
Brighton can afford these fees currently due to the return on investments they've made moving players along recently. They would not be spending these fees had they not sold the likes of Caicedo, MacAlliser, Sanchez, Cucurella, Bissouma, Trossard and White (I'm sure there are others too) for huge profit/positive impact on PSR. Without these sales, the players you've listed above either don't move to Brighton, or they move for a different fee.
We could not be further from this sustainable reality at the moment, unfortunately. Look at our money saving attempts across the running of the club. A 40/30m fee for us right now requires a lot from us (shifting deadweights and opening up contract funds).
Another take on the Brighton example would be to question how much they would have ended up spending on transfers like Hojlund and Zirkzee for example. Both players would be lucky to get into Brighton's starting XI and I imagine would have cost a fraction of what we forked out. This isn't to dismiss either player, just acknowledging a likely reality.
Niels Bohring, amirite?Danes are useless. Remember that dud Schmeichel. Wozniak kicks up a racket and disappoints. As for Hans Christian Anderson…
More successful attacking actions than even Amorims favorite at Sporting, Quenda
I guess the fee comes down to several things:
More than happy to acknowledge my lack of expertise in this particular transfer. Dorgu may well be a fantastic signing and end up holding down our left side for the next decade.
However, where I think concern is more than fair is around the quoted fee and the severe restrictions we know we're operating under.
Given Dorgu's profile, age and experience you're likely looking at a player who could end up performing similarly to Kerkez, Ait-Nouri, Robinson or Munoz in the EPL. I think everyone here would consider that outcome a pretty decent success and return.
The differences? Kerkez cost Bournemouth 6.6m initially, Nouri cost under 10m, Robinson cost 2m and Munoz 6.9m. All the clubs in question are currently above us in the league.
I don't understand why would agree to a fee that's 4 times that of the players above, especially when he cost Lecce 400k not too long ago.
This would be a really poor use of funds regardless of Dorgu's talent/potential, especially as he's currently being linked to absolutely no-one else.
The problem with these sites though is that the raw stats used to compare are the same in both positions since it's collating his stats over the whole season from all positions he has played, right? In order to get a true reflection of how he performs you'd need to look at the raw stats of when he plays in each position rather than overall.Hes played the majority of games as an outright winger, with far less as a fullback and sometimes starting as a fullback and then being moved to a winger during the game. So its harder to directly compare him to wingbacks when most of the time he's playing with less defensive responsibility to get back than they have and receiving the ball higher up the pitch.
His stats compared to wingers arent great. And he's started 11 games on the wing and 7 as a fullback
His real stats are somewhere between these two images, but more towards the first as he's played 4 more games as a winger and AM than at fullback. Also in that way with him being used mostly as a winger/am and then less games as a fullback he's almost in an Amad situation.
When looking at his stats only when picked in midfield or attack, he averages 2 shots which is good. But 0.8 key passes and 0.8 successful dribbles and 27.2 passes. Not that involved and not a particularly good end product other than getting shots away. He's obviously playing in a team that isnt doing that well and hes young.
When playing in defence only he still manages 1.3 shots per 90, dribbles are 0.4 which is very low, key passes go up to 1 and he averages 33.1 passes so a bit more involved with his passing.
His ball winning stats are good regardless of whether picked as a fullback or a winger/am so it seems likely that wont be a concern. It'll be about whether he really contributes enough in attack
The problem with these sites though is that the raw stats used to compare are the same in both positions since it's collating his stats over the whole season from all positions he has played, right? In order to get a true reflection of how he performs you'd need to look at the raw stats of when he plays in each position rather than overall.
Yeah, it would be good if the sites were able to do it too to give fair comparisons.Thats why I gave the stats at the bottom, using whoscored to filter just the attacking positions and the defending positions seperately
There is just one red flag here. 40% passing success rate seems abysmal. We can't afford another player who can't play a pass over 5 yards.
Huge potential, sign from a smaller club before he properly "breaks out". Huge fan of this type of signing, and I don't think it rules out going for another wing back in the summer either.
He joined from some Danish side for €400,000. 40 games later and he's worth €40 million.
Why is this club so stupid? We honestly deserve PSR/FFP to destroy us.
Really? Might just be a bad roll in my save but he isn't rated any better than Dalot and he appears to be more of a winger than a wingback as his defensive attributes absolutely suck.FM legend
Agree, although these type of buys are normally around £20m. He's going to cost almost double.
40M euros, and I still anticipate any figure like that that is floated around to eventually drop. 30M euros would be reasonable I think.Agree, although these type of buys are normally around £20m. He's going to cost almost double.
Your response is genuinely one of the worst I’ve ever read on this forum, “I’ve never heard of him, he can’t be any good” you actually have the audacity to insinuate that post had meaning?Just discuss the topic, don't be boring with your silly and meaningless responses.
My experience with him also wasn’t positive but people rave about him on all FM related websites. He is included in all shortlist of top LB/LWB.Really? Might just be a bad roll in my save but he isn't rated any better than Dalot and he appears to be more of a winger than a wingback as his defensive attributes absolutely suck.
A nice trip to the south of Italy I see
His pace and athleticism alone will be nice to bring into the side. The more powerful players, the better. Especially in those gruelling wingback positions.
Not sure how well we can expect a 20 year old from a relegation threatened Serie A side to hit the ground running at Manchester United, but I think he should be okay generally.
In an ideal world we target someone a bit more proven — the names like Ait Nouri, Mendes, Robinson, Davies etc. will come to mind — but I don’t think we have the facilities for that. Dorgu will undoubtedly be on a lot less money than them