P&G Draft - QF: harms vs Team Beam

With players at their career peak, who would win?


  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.

Doubt marcelo will be getting much joy down the beckham/neal flank.
 
If they plan to get anything from this game Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo.
Gullit would be a decent fit while Bobby not so much, i dont think we can upgrade this midfield anymore if im honest. We can get bigger names and better players but the chemistry and tactical fits here for both team and each other is second to none, at least in my opinion.

I like Giresse but Gullit would be a clear upgrade in almost every respect. I'll watch the Marcelo videos later if I get the chance. You make a good point about Romario Vs Vidic as even with a deeper defence Romario's acceleration could be a problem
 
I like Giresse but Gullit would be a clear upgrade in almost every respect. I'll watch the Marcelo videos later if I get the chance. You make a good point about Romario Vs Vidic as even with a deeper defence Romario's acceleration could be a problem

No question that Gullit is the superior player but for this team its Giresse. His individual impact might not be as big as Gullits but he will make everyone around him better, something that Gullit wont do + he is a much better fit for a possession heavy system where he would find himself in tight spots more often then not. But not important for this discussion though :)
 
No question that Gullit is the superior player but for this team its Giresse. His individual impact might not be as big as Gullits but he will make everyone around him better, something that Gullit wont do + he is a much better fit for a possession heavy system where he would find himself in tight spots more often then not. But not important for this discussion though :)

I may or may not have a vested interest in promoting Gullit :angel:
 
No question that Gullit is the superior player but for this team its Giresse. His individual impact might not be as big as Gullits but he will make everyone around him better, something that Gullit wont do + he is a much better fit for a possession heavy system where he would find himself in tight spots more often then not. But not important for this discussion though :)
Agree with this. Fits like a glove.
 
Ohh and one more thing about Pele and Law, to pulls a 442 at this level you need hardworkers up top, i honestly dont know how good they are in that aspect, suspect not that great
Ehm? Law is one of the most hardworking strikers ever. Just watch a game with him — or Joga's compilations.

SAF said:
I saw him make his debut against Wales at Ninian Park in Cardiff in 1958 and I watched him (as a 18 year old) in his next game against Northern Ireland when he kicked their captain Danny Blanchflower up and down the park! He was told to mark the great Spurs player, but he took it too literally. He was only 18 years old at the time, too, and Danny was one of the best players in Britain. I think it was Pele who said Denis was the only British player who could get into the Brazilian team. That says it all
Giles said:
Look, the best way to judge that is you've got to go to some places like Argentina, where you know it's going to be tough, or maybe behind the Old Iron Curtain. And you're playing for your life. Who are you going to pick?

Certain names would be mentioned straight away for such an assignment - there would be Norman Hunter, Dave Mackay, Cliff Jones, Bobby Collins and I would add John Robertson, though John wasn't exactly a killer either. And you will go for Denis Law rather than Jimmy Greaves, because Denis may be remembered almost entirely for his goal-scoring brilliance but he was also a very aggressive player, and in fact in some circumstances would take your head off. Yes, for such a trip to the wilds of Argentina, you would need these hard nuts, the gladiatorial types.
Greig said:
When it comes to strikers, there was none braver or more aggressive than Denis Law. My Scotland team-mate may have looked puny, but he had the heart of a lion and would have fought with his shadow. He was also deceptively strong and fought for every ball, but it was in the air that Denis really excelled. He seemed to have the capacity to hang in the air when he jumped for the ball. When I met him for the first time, Denis made an instant impression; he had an almost magical aura because of his personality. Denis is actually quite a private person but he was a truly great player.
et cetera et cetera
 
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.

Doubt marcelo will be getting much joy down the beckham/neal flank.

If harms wants any chance in this game then Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo as he needs to help his midfield as much as he can and he cant do that if he marks Marcelo on the line. Its going to be Marcelo vs Neal and i know where my money is in that bet.
 
Ehm? Law is one of the most hardworking strikers ever. Just watch a game with him — or Joga's compilations.




et cetera et cetera

i said i dont know.....long time since i watched Law so i forgot, thats why i mentioned it.
 
They don't even have a right winger?

I am thinking more in terms of romario attacking down the flank(between evra and vidic) with laudrup passing, I doubt resenbrink will help out much and can see his side creating overload on that flank.
 
I am thinking more in terms of romario attacking down the flank(between evra and vidic) with laudrup passing, I doubt resenbrink will help out much and can see his side creating overload on that flank.
Can't see it being the match winner when there's Pelé and Law on the other side but fair enough.
 
If harms wants any chance in this game then Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo as he needs to help his midfield as much as he can and he cant do that if he marks Marcelo on the line. Its going to be Marcelo vs Neal and i know where my money is in that bet.

I think his midfield will hold his own as yours is going to spend a large part of its energy in dealing with pele.
 
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.

Agree with harms that seems a little bit harsh on Evra / Vidic given they’re primarily up against Armfield (and occasionally Giresse).

If Romario roams out to the right wing that seems like a positive thing for harms.
 
I think his midfield will hold his own as yours is going to spend a large part of its energy in dealing with pele.

So Effenberg Lerby pair will hold their own against a diamond of Redondo Davids Giresse and Laudrup? Ok.
 
Can't see it being the match winner when there's Pelé and Law on the other side but fair enough.

I am leaning 60-40 towards a beam win so might still change my mind, just feel that he can limit pele's influence here to an extent with his midfielders and defence while your does the same with laudrup.
 
If harms wants any chance in this game then Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo as he needs to help his midfield as much as he can and he cant do that if he marks Marcelo on the line. Its going to be Marcelo vs Neal and i know where my money is in that bet.
You're really overestimating your midfield. It's great, but it's not going to keep 70% of possession like Barca's would've, for example. Plus since Laudrup is a part of a front 2 (and not really a hardworking player), it's going to be 3 vs 3 (Davids, Redondo, Giresse vs Lerby, Effenberg and Beckham) for most of the time. And I've provided enough evidence for Lerby standing his own (and arguably outshining Giresse) in 2 different games and Effenberg having an upper hand in every encounter that he had with Redondo. Don't get me wrong, I think that your midfield is superior and it will have more possession, but you're far from dominating anything.

By the way, check this — and say me with a straight face that Laudrup will help your midfield more defensively. And notice that, like with Beckham, it doesn't take anything away from Law's attacking game — it was the way he was playing naturally.


edit: for some reason I said Davids instead of Redondo
 
So Effenberg Lerby pair will hold their own against a diamond of Redondo Davids Giresse and Laudrup? Ok.

Well the way I see it playing out is that davids+redondo will largely be concerned with trying to battle Pele so its more effenberg and lerby against giresse and laudrup. There I am giving you a slight edge as I think laudrup + romario will influence the game more than pele+law due to the differences in the defence for both sides.

If beckham does drift inside to help out with midfield, I can see marcelo running riot here and that will cause more damage to his side thats why I feel like he will help restrict marcelo influence with neal and cancel out that flank.
 
So Effenberg Lerby pair will hold their own against a diamond of Redondo Davids Giresse and Laudrup? Ok.
It's not a diamond, and it's not Effenberg - Lerby. First of all, Laudrup is a part of the attacking unit — and he is your secondary goalscoring threat, since you're "not only relying on Romario". Second, Beckham is playing - again, his natural game, where he contributes to midfield — and because of his skillset it, again, doesn't take much from his offensive game.

Plus Redondo is looking after Pelé, as your co-manager said...
 
Not really, since Bobby will always be there

I agree Moore is an excellent fit for Romario but in this field it's mostly the striker who determines who they are up against not the defender
 
Plus Redondo is looking after Pelé, as your co-manager said...

What I said is that he will cover him along with 3 world-class defenders behind him? Pele will run riot here losing the midfield battle as you said and I just can't get the thinking process in which he will pull the strings and decide with you constantly defending.

That Lerby game was great btw.

https://www.transfermarkt.com/spielbericht/index/spielbericht/2846913

Absolutely run the show.
 
Some persuasive head-to-head arguments @harms on Pele/Schulz, Effenberg/Redondo and Lerby/Giresse.
 
What I said is that he will cover him along with 3 world-class defenders behind him? Pele will run riot here losing the midfield battle as you said and I just can't get the thinking process in which he will have run riot here with you constantly defending.
That's the thing, isn't it? I won't be constantly defending. I will have the ball less than you do but you don't have a Barca-esque possessional juggernaut that will deny me the ball.
 
You're really overestimating your midfield. It's great, but it's not going to keep 70% of possession like Barca's would've, for example. Plus since Laudrup is a part of a front 2 (and not really a hardworking player), it's going to be 3 vs 3 (Davids, Redondo, Giresse vs Lerby, Effenberg and Beckham) for most of the time. And I've provided enough evidence for Lerby standing his own (and arguably outshining Giresse) in 2 different games and Effenberg having an upper hand in every encounter that he had with Redondo. Don't get me wrong, I think that your midfield is superior and it will have more possession, but you're far from dominating anything.

By the way, check this — and say me with a straight face that Laudrup will help your midfield more defensively. And notice that, like with Beckham, it doesn't take anything away from Law's attacking game — it was the way he was playing naturally.


edit: for some reason I said Davids instead of Redondo


With player profiles on the pitch and specially with how the teams are set up there is no question we will have a vast majority of the possession. Laudrup will play like Laudrup, this time he is free and ready to roam around where ever he wants, and lets not forget he often played in a front three for Barca and would then drop and do his thing so him being a second striker as you say its a non issue because it will ultimativly change nothing in his game.
So yeah, its a diamond and if Beckham(which is a no brainer for me) gets inside to help the midfield its going to isolate Marcelo against Neal.

We never really mentioned Laudrup as part of our defensive sheme so not sure why are you bringing that up?



Regarding individual battles from other games, its hardly relevent in most cases because the whole match dynamics are different. Schulz being in a possession heavy team protected by Stam, Ruggeri and Redondo at DM in front of him will very rarely if ever leave him 1v1 against Pele/Law.
As Lerby had great games against France and Giresse it also has to be said that Giresse had great games against them.
Regarding Effenberg and Redondo, cant really remember how they fared in their clash but i can remember that Madrid team wasnt that good with players being forced into the team and similar other issues they had at the time.
 
That's the thing, isn't it? I won't be constantly defending. I will have the ball less than you do but you don't have a Barca-esque possessional juggernaut that will deny me the ball.

Yeah, that's clearly the part we disagree really. For your attacking power you will mostly lose (because of his defending part) Beckham cross danger and you will just go through the middle with a formidable defensive unit... Or Rosenbrink on the other flank.

Just can't see how you will have more chances in this game.
 
Not teaming up, just gonna leave it here as I have to go.

What a wonderful player and would be a shame when he is in the draft to not appreciate his genius.

 
For your attacking power you will mostly lose (because of his defending part) Beckham cross danger
How do I lose his crossing ability because he helps out defensively? It's the way he always played (and it helped massively with our Keane/Scholes or Keane/Butt midfield), and the beauty of Beckham's crossing is that he can do it from pretty much anywhere on the pitch — he doesn't even need to beat his fullback.

this


or this
 
@Jim Beam your turn
PatMat-Countryside-770x355.jpg
 
How do I lose his crossing ability because he helps out defensively? It's the way he always played (and it helped massively with our Keane/Scholes or Keane/Butt midfield), and the beauty of Beckham's crossing is that he can do it from pretty much anywhere on the pitch — he doesn't even need to beat his fullback.

this


or this


Because he will have to go in the centre being in the defensive phase to help Effenberg and Lerby? It' s not the way he played at United, more Madrid version.
 
That midfield from Team Beam is absolutely orgasmic. Love the dynamic between Laudrup and Giresse. Couldn't find a better 'quality sidekick' for that role than Giresse who would provide just the blend of tactical awareness, creative spurts and hard working off the ball contribution required to get the best out of Laudrup, who in that alpha role could just finish the game with two passes. Redondo taking command of things at the back and Davids being the all action dynamo makes it one of the best midfields I have seen assembled. Lovely stuff.

Cheers moby. As expected from a man who loves Redondo, Modric and the likes of Westbrook.

We will go on the counter in the evening when harms gets complacent.