MJJ
New Member
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.
Doubt marcelo will be getting much joy down the beckham/neal flank.
Doubt marcelo will be getting much joy down the beckham/neal flank.
If they plan to get anything from this game Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo.
Gullit would be a decent fit while Bobby not so much, i dont think we can upgrade this midfield anymore if im honest. We can get bigger names and better players but the chemistry and tactical fits here for both team and each other is second to none, at least in my opinion.
I like Giresse but Gullit would be a clear upgrade in almost every respect. I'll watch the Marcelo videos later if I get the chance. You make a good point about Romario Vs Vidic as even with a deeper defence Romario's acceleration could be a problem
No question that Gullit is the superior player but for this team its Giresse. His individual impact might not be as big as Gullits but he will make everyone around him better, something that Gullit wont do + he is a much better fit for a possession heavy system where he would find himself in tight spots more often then not. But not important for this discussion though
Agree with this. Fits like a glove.No question that Gullit is the superior player but for this team its Giresse. His individual impact might not be as big as Gullits but he will make everyone around him better, something that Gullit wont do + he is a much better fit for a possession heavy system where he would find himself in tight spots more often then not. But not important for this discussion though
Ehm? Law is one of the most hardworking strikers ever. Just watch a game with him — or Joga's compilations.Ohh and one more thing about Pele and Law, to pulls a 442 at this level you need hardworkers up top, i honestly dont know how good they are in that aspect, suspect not that great
SAF said:I saw him make his debut against Wales at Ninian Park in Cardiff in 1958 and I watched him (as a 18 year old) in his next game against Northern Ireland when he kicked their captain Danny Blanchflower up and down the park! He was told to mark the great Spurs player, but he took it too literally. He was only 18 years old at the time, too, and Danny was one of the best players in Britain. I think it was Pele who said Denis was the only British player who could get into the Brazilian team. That says it all
Giles said:Look, the best way to judge that is you've got to go to some places like Argentina, where you know it's going to be tough, or maybe behind the Old Iron Curtain. And you're playing for your life. Who are you going to pick?
Certain names would be mentioned straight away for such an assignment - there would be Norman Hunter, Dave Mackay, Cliff Jones, Bobby Collins and I would add John Robertson, though John wasn't exactly a killer either. And you will go for Denis Law rather than Jimmy Greaves, because Denis may be remembered almost entirely for his goal-scoring brilliance but he was also a very aggressive player, and in fact in some circumstances would take your head off. Yes, for such a trip to the wilds of Argentina, you would need these hard nuts, the gladiatorial types.
et cetera et ceteraGreig said:When it comes to strikers, there was none braver or more aggressive than Denis Law. My Scotland team-mate may have looked puny, but he had the heart of a lion and would have fought with his shadow. He was also deceptively strong and fought for every ball, but it was in the air that Denis really excelled. He seemed to have the capacity to hang in the air when he jumped for the ball. When I met him for the first time, Denis made an instant impression; he had an almost magical aura because of his personality. Denis is actually quite a private person but he was a truly great player.
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.
Doubt marcelo will be getting much joy down the beckham/neal flank.
They don't even have a right winger?Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.
Ehm? Law is one of the most hardworking strikers ever. Just watch a game with him — or Joga's compilations.
et cetera et cetera
Not really, since Bobby will always be thereYou make a good point about Romario Vs Vidic as even with a deeper defence Romario's acceleration could be a problem
Not really, since Bobby will always be there
They don't even have a right winger?
Shouldn't have added "...suspect not that great" then. Check any video from this threadi said i dont know.....long time since i watched Law so i forgot, thats why i mentioned it.
Can't see it being the match winner when there's Pelé and Law on the other side but fair enough.I am thinking more in terms of romario attacking down the flank(between evra and vidic) with laudrup passing, I doubt resenbrink will help out much and can see his side creating overload on that flank.
If harms wants any chance in this game then Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo as he needs to help his midfield as much as he can and he cant do that if he marks Marcelo on the line. Its going to be Marcelo vs Neal and i know where my money is in that bet.
Personally feel like the match will be lost on the evra/vidic flank.
I think his midfield will hold his own as yours is going to spend a large part of its energy in dealing with pele.
Can't see it being the match winner when there's Pelé and Law on the other side but fair enough.
You're really overestimating your midfield. It's great, but it's not going to keep 70% of possession like Barca's would've, for example. Plus since Laudrup is a part of a front 2 (and not really a hardworking player), it's going to be 3 vs 3 (Davids, Redondo, Giresse vs Lerby, Effenberg and Beckham) for most of the time. And I've provided enough evidence for Lerby standing his own (and arguably outshining Giresse) in 2 different games and Effenberg having an upper hand in every encounter that he had with Redondo. Don't get me wrong, I think that your midfield is superior and it will have more possession, but you're far from dominating anything.If harms wants any chance in this game then Beckham should be nowhere near Marcelo as he needs to help his midfield as much as he can and he cant do that if he marks Marcelo on the line. Its going to be Marcelo vs Neal and i know where my money is in that bet.
So Effenberg Lerby pair will hold their own against a diamond of Redondo Davids Giresse and Laudrup? Ok.
It's not a diamond, and it's not Effenberg - Lerby. First of all, Laudrup is a part of the attacking unit — and he is your secondary goalscoring threat, since you're "not only relying on Romario". Second, Beckham is playing - again, his natural game, where he contributes to midfield — and because of his skillset it, again, doesn't take much from his offensive game.So Effenberg Lerby pair will hold their own against a diamond of Redondo Davids Giresse and Laudrup? Ok.
As was Messi... You don't have one (and you don't have any reliable goalscoring outlet apart from Romario)Rio was always there as well
I'm taking over
I feel like John fecking Rambo hereI'm taking over
I feel like John fecking Rambo here
I feel like John fecking Rambo here
Not really, since Bobby will always be there
Plus Redondo is looking after Pelé, as your co-manager said...
That's the thing, isn't it? I won't be constantly defending. I will have the ball less than you do but you don't have a Barca-esque possessional juggernaut that will deny me the ball.What I said is that he will cover him along with 3 world-class defenders behind him? Pele will run riot here losing the midfield battle as you said and I just can't get the thinking process in which he will have run riot here with you constantly defending.
You're really overestimating your midfield. It's great, but it's not going to keep 70% of possession like Barca's would've, for example. Plus since Laudrup is a part of a front 2 (and not really a hardworking player), it's going to be 3 vs 3 (Davids, Redondo, Giresse vs Lerby, Effenberg and Beckham) for most of the time. And I've provided enough evidence for Lerby standing his own (and arguably outshining Giresse) in 2 different games and Effenberg having an upper hand in every encounter that he had with Redondo. Don't get me wrong, I think that your midfield is superior and it will have more possession, but you're far from dominating anything.
By the way, check this — and say me with a straight face that Laudrup will help your midfield more defensively. And notice that, like with Beckham, it doesn't take anything away from Law's attacking game — it was the way he was playing naturally.
edit: for some reason I said Davids instead of Redondo
That's the thing, isn't it? I won't be constantly defending. I will have the ball less than you do but you don't have a Barca-esque possessional juggernaut that will deny me the ball.
How do I lose his crossing ability because he helps out defensively? It's the way he always played (and it helped massively with our Keane/Scholes or Keane/Butt midfield), and the beauty of Beckham's crossing is that he can do it from pretty much anywhere on the pitch — he doesn't even need to beat his fullback.For your attacking power you will mostly lose (because of his defending part) Beckham cross danger
How do I lose his crossing ability because he helps out defensively? It's the way he always played (and it helped massively with our Keane/Scholes or Keane/Butt midfield), and the beauty of Beckham's crossing is that he can do it from pretty much anywhere on the pitch — he doesn't even need to beat his fullback.
this
or this
That midfield from Team Beam is absolutely orgasmic. Love the dynamic between Laudrup and Giresse. Couldn't find a better 'quality sidekick' for that role than Giresse who would provide just the blend of tactical awareness, creative spurts and hard working off the ball contribution required to get the best out of Laudrup, who in that alpha role could just finish the game with two passes. Redondo taking command of things at the back and Davids being the all action dynamo makes it one of the best midfields I have seen assembled. Lovely stuff.