The issue is that the player won't be registered for Barcelona, if he was to fail it and it's important to remember that medicals are subjective procedures.
Assuming he will get injured is exactly the same hypothetical.This is like those "Jones is quality when fit" posts. It's a pointless hypothetical.
Definitely a loan!Do you mean on a loan or permanent basis?
My point is that one outcome is significantly more likely than the other.Assuming he will get injured is exactly the same hypothetical.
Glad this is not happening. Would have been a terrible mistake.
So an injury to Greenwood and its Dan James on the RW?
we are like Arnie in that Christmas toy movie, scrabbling around.
Disneyland was fecking right, Woodward you dozy feck.
I hope that you saw what you did?
So an injury to Greenwood and its Dan James on the RW?
I know that, but if he’s injured enough to fail a medical, he’d be no good to anyone until he can re-register for Barca in Jan anyhow.
I don't want him to EVER play wide for us. Central no.9 or super sub. Nothing else.Didnt Cavani play wide a lot at PSG?
He isn't injured at the moment and a medical isn't to assess whether you are injured but to allow the buyer to assess the long term viability of a transfer from a medical standpoint. A player can "fail" a medical and play tomorrow without problem. The issue with the scenario that you have described is that Dembélé is currently fit to play and also registered, if he "fails" a medical at United tomorrow, he won't be able to play until January for administrative reasons.