What's weird to me with the chat in here is people being wildly optimistic in relation to Dembele actually being a net positive for us instead of an additional problem that could see Greenwood and Rashford absolutely knackered by the run-in.
If we brought Dembele in, it would be safe to assume James is on his way and no Sancho, which leaves us with wide options of:
- A half-crocked Rashford, who may well need time out of the team with his back.
- A teenager who needs correct handling and rotation.
- A player who is basically useless now, in Mata.
And Dembele... a player who may - or may not - see the pitch.
His talent isn't in question - if he could stay fit, you've one of the wide-men of his generation who it would be a surprise to absolutely nobody if he was contesting ballon d'or's a few years down the line, but it doesn't count for anything if you can't rely on him from game to game let alone month to month. In our predicament, with a frontline so bereft of depth, that's an unwise path to go down in our most congested season where games will pile on in such a suffocating manner.
I'm not against the player, but looking at it with cold logic, it looks like a really risky idea if he's the sole forward we bring in this window.
Sancho and Dembele could well be vying for #1 WF on the planet throughout their careers, but the major difference between them right here and now is one has barely missed a game to date, the other, it gets harder and harder to recall a proper run of games from. It's easy to say they are neck and neck and as a contingency option one can spot the other, but one logically comes in and aids us across two positions almost as a certainty whilst the other could leave us even thinner than we currently are.
I'd think you'd need Dembele + other (say a Perisic, or even James staying) to cover for the loss of Sancho as it's not 1:1 in terms of fitness. But then, you're looking at a significant outlay in wages if it's two players coming in from outside the club.