But player and manager performance is not the same thing, and the former is much, much easier to make an informed decision about since we can actually watch them preform live and we have loads of stats to pick from. Rashford has always divided opinion, but that's because hes the very definition of inconsistent. Yesterday for example he had a brilliant game overall, yet that miss from James's pass in the second half for example was laughably bad. Fred's career here so far has been one disaster after the other, but hes really stepped it up lately and if it turns out hes actually a competent player i would be thrilled.
A mangers "performance" though is much, much harder to make a fair judgement off. We dont have the faintest clue of what is happening at Carrington, yet people are more than willing to make bold claims about him and our coaches being utterly clueless based on a couple of bad performances. A manager also needs much more time when he takes on a new job as the things he is responsible for: Squad building, coaching, implementing tactics etc can take months and years before you see actual results, where as an individual player has to play football to the best of his ability and most people can spot pretty fast if hes doing a good job or not.
People love to throw around the "10 months" argument, but when you take over an utterly demoralized squad mid season with a busy schedule, there is little you can do in terms of squad building and coaching. You have to pick up the pieces and try and make the best of it. The circumstances he inherited was also incredibly difficult. You have a huge club with big expectations, yet the squad had massive holes in it, fitness was shite, morale was rock bottom and there were plenty of bad apples in the dressing room that was creating unrest in the squad.
I know your stance on Ole, and i know you give him credit when we are doing better. But just because you are reasonable does not mean others are.