Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 55,102
I can guarantee you both brought far more to us than Ole will at his time here.
That psg high was a higher single feeling than even the cup wins from the others
I can guarantee you both brought far more to us than Ole will at his time here.
Well for starters our style under Mourinho and our style under early days of Ole cannot be more different. Under Ole we pressed more, made more runs, overall ran more, which can take a toll on players especially considering Ole was appointed just before Holiday madness period where games come thick and fast. Could it be that his style has burned out some players hence the plethora the injuries that followed shortly after and a subsequent return to how we looked under Mourinho?
Correct.The "poor fitness" excuse is simply laughable. That Huddersfield team that we heroically managed to draw against are the worst team in the PL I have seen in a long long time. They gave us so much space that sometimes I wondered whether they are League 2 side, any decently coached side would have put at least 3 past them. And guess what? We were mostly horrible and scored just because their GK fecked up. It has nothing to do with fitness.
The "poor fitness" excuse is simply laughable. That Huddersfield team that we heroically managed to draw against are the worst team in the PL I have seen in a long long time. They gave us so much space that sometimes I wondered whether they are League 2 side, any decently coached side would have put at least 3 past them. And guess what? We were mostly horrible and scored just because their GK fecked up. It has nothing to do with fitness.
Yep, I am, don't worry. Wish I could fast forward a year or so as the next season is the write-off anyway but unfortunately I can't so you will need to come to terms with us whiners.I can't keep repeating myself. Go ahead and believe whatever you like
Fact is, Ole will remain in charge for another 10 months minimum. Better you come to terms with that rather than whine about it on a public message board.
It still remains the reason for his appointment, whether you agree with it or not. He won't be sacked this early without there being an obvious replacement available, and if those who are desperate for him to leave can't think of any alternatives - perhaps don't be so surprised to see him stay in charge for the coming season.Our Board has a track record of failure so that is not a convincing argument. They rushed into a decision based on that initial honeymoon period and, if I were being cynical, after being burnt by Mourinho were probably not discouraged by the fact that hiring Ole required minimal compensation and a modest salary package.
It still remains the reason for his appointment, whether you agree with it or not. He won't be sacked this early without there being an obvious replacement available, and if those who are desperate for him to leave can't think of any alternatives - perhaps don't be so surprised to see him stay in charge for the coming season.
So, hiring manager after manager and giving them time, albeit them being a failure could easily be predicted by random football fans is the right thing to do?It still remains the reason for his appointment, whether you agree with it or not. He won't be sacked this early without there being an obvious replacement available, and if those who are desperate for him to leave can't think of any alternatives - perhaps don't be so surprised to see him stay in charge for the coming season.
OK. So his lack of experience and poor CV doesn’t count. Cardiff didn’t happened and being successful in Norway is equal to winning in a far more competitive league. Correct?
Secondly you say this isn’t his team. Sorry to disappoint you but it is. If you take this job you’re responsible for the results from day one. If you want to credit him for our first ten games then you have to accept he’s responsible for all the results up to this point. The wins and the losses. Nobody suggests it’s his fault only but the million dollar question is do we see any improvements under his command. Simple. Is this team any better then the team we saw in the beginning of the season? Do you see his vision, any structure or his long term plan? If so, enlighten me.
Five month and 20+ games isn’t a big sample size to judge him on but it isn’t a small size either. We have seen many new managers implement their identity and visions in less time so it can be done if you have the knowledge and the authority. Apart from this many supporters and some players want to see a leader who install respect and show leadership, someone who breathe confidence and knowledge. Do you think the players see this? Do you see this? If so, again, then enlightened me with what you see.
Finally, you don’t know, like the rest of us, but you hope he will be successful. This is your and many others posters defense in a nutshell. Hope....
(This is not personal, I like your optimism and the way you support Ole Gunnar the best you can. Nothing but respect even if we don’t share the same conclusions)
I don’t expect him to be sacked any time soon, nor would it be fair to do so at this stage. However I don’t think the decision to appoint him was well-considered and I have low expectations for next season.
What are you on about?So, hiring manager after manager and giving them time, albeit them being a failure could easily be predicted by random football fans is the right thing to do?
I guess that's the "United way" under Woodward.
What's the point of keeping him for the next season since it's pretty evident we are not much different compared to when he first came? To write off yet another season or two?What are you on about?
What's the point of keeping him for the next season since it's pretty evident we are not much different compared to when he first came? To write off yet another season or two?
What's the point of keeping him for the next season since it's pretty evident we are not much different compared to when he first came? To write off yet another season or two?
So in other words - write off season or two and couple of hundred million pounds. Brilliant management from Ed once again.It would be hugely embarrassing for the board to sack him now. They will want to give him a fair crack at it.
I imagine the situation will be revisited in December/January...
So in other words - write off season or two and couple of hundred million pounds. Brilliant management from Ed once again.
Wonder on who will he pin it this time to save face.Yes. He (Ed) wrote off last season before it started as well, so this is becoming a bit of a running theme now.
In terms of effort and caring for the club they are far worseReally? They're worse than most your squads in the 80s? Stop being facetious.
You can't expect him to be sacked one month after being given the job unless there is an obvious replacement available (which has yet to be suggested). That's not to say I agree with how the club is being run - quite the opposite actually. However, from a logical standpoint I can't see him being sacked at this stage and those who are hoping for it to happen will be left disappointed.What's the point of keeping him for the next season since it's pretty evident we are not much different compared to when he first came? To write off yet another season or two?
Lopetegui was sacked 14 matches after getting the job. Ole is 22% win rate since appointed - two times worse off than him.You can't expect him to be sacked one month after being given the job unless there is an obvious replacement available (which has yet to be suggested). That's not to say I agree with how the club is being run - quite the opposite actually. However, from a logical standpoint I can't see him being sacked at this stage and those who are hoping for it to happen will be left disappointed.
Lopetegui was sacked 14 matches after getting the job. Ole is 22% win rate since appointed - two times worse off than him.
The only reason why he won't be sacked is because Ed will save face.
Lopetegui was sacked 14 matches after getting the job. Ole is 22% win rate since appointed - two times worse off than him.
The only reason why he won't be sacked is because Ed will save face.
Appointed 28th of March. Since then:Pretty sure 22% is wrong.
No, the only reason he is not sacked is because he need and deserve a full preseason and at least two transfer windows. We also need to shape up the club.
Appointed 28th of March. Since then:
2 wins - Watford and WHU.
2 draws
5 losses.
It's 22.2% if you are being punctual.
Aye, full time. Otherwise he should've walked come the end of the season (as he was hired as interim).Appointed full time manager yes, you didn't state that. Either way I'm no Ole fan and was against his full time appointment.
Deserve how? On what basis? Do we give that to every wrong appointment we make?
You do understand we are going to recycle hundreds of millions and dozens of players in that process?
What does this mean though? Fire Ole now and get Ed to sell the entire squad while buying a new one? That’s what a reset means right? Wouldn’t that be unrealistic and disruptive? Has there actually be clubs successful doing this?That was a "lost the dressing room" performance yesterday. I think United should do now how Real Madrid does it with managers and players when in doubt: press the reset button. Rinse and repeat. Did he do well at the start and deserved the chance? It doesn't matter. Did he lose it when he said he wanted 5 new players and signed a contract? It doesn't matter. Does he deserve a longer shot? Would it be fair? Is it nice? It doesn't matter. Forget this romance. At such a big club you have to be brutal and press reset. Like Madrid did with Lopetegui and Solari, and even will do with Zidane if it doesn't work out.
Mate. Its currently not a wrong appointment, its just to early to say. We will find out next season. The bigger issue is if the club are willing to change and shape up. That would not only benefit OGS, but our next manager as well. Something is very wrong at our club atm and its easy to see that we are old and outdated.
Well I am not going to argue in here anymore. Fire OGS or not, we are stuck atm.
Chelsea, Real?What does this mean though? Fire Ole now and get Ed to sell the entire squad while buying a new one? That’s what a reset means right? Wouldn’t that be unrealistic and disruptive? Has there actually be clubs successful doing this?
It's a factor for sure, but i refuse to believe 2 wins in 10 is down to injuries and fatigue alone. The players hardly ran their socks off under Jose, so having the whole team collapse from fatigue because Ole asked them to press high for a couple of months seems damning on their fitness levels.
Even if im wrong and the players still would give 100% for Ole, the fact they all collapse like this at the end of the season because they are knackered is hardly something that can be blamed on him.
I still feel we make the same mistakes over and over again. Ole hasn't really proven he deserves a chance to get the transfer window now and next season IMO.
We are falling behind not only City and Liverpool but the top 4 as a whole. I agree with you in terms of overall structure obviously but this shit throwing against the wall in terms of appointing managers needs to stop.
The whole point of appointing DoF this year was that he'd choose the next manager. Now if we stick with Ole what's the point? We hire a DoF who again has to follow the order we already have - a mess.
You can’t because normal sensible people and companies do not work in such ways and certainly not Manchester United. Sets a terrible precedent and is a reputational problem.You can, when the footballing side of your club is run by a moron, who has done nothing short of a feckup after a feckup since he was hired.
So if LVG couldn’t and Mourinho couldn’t and you don’t think Ole can, which miraculous individual do you think is out there that convinces Ed or will manage to get rid of the deadwood? You are getting riled up at Ole for matters outside his control which is frankly, irrational.It's not only poor fitness. That's a comfortable excuse. So far he hasn't been able to turn things around when they become sour. Poor fitness doesn't excuse performance like yesterday against Huddersfield.
He hasn't really proven track record of handling big players, neither Ole has a clear vision of how his style is or how the team should play. We started with high press now we ended it. He's making poor sub decisions and doesn't really seems to have plan B.
We hired clown like Moyes without proven track record and was the beginning of the slide.
If we keep hiring managers that aren't good enough, giving them time and funds to bring their own players we end up with... Well you can clearly see with what.
On what basis you will give Ole 1-2 years and 200-300m pounds to bring in his players? Would be yet another poor appointment.
I doubt Ole will clear the deadwood as everyone seems to be implying. A much more ruthless manager in Mourinho couldn't, yet Ole will?
Clearly fitness is an important issue even if you refuse to acknowledge. Anyone who has played sport at any level for competitiveness knows that fitness can be the difference in concentration, in motivation, in executing a well-trained skills. If it has nothing to do with fitness, why do clubs even bother to train fitness? In any case, we did have chances and a few sitters against Huddersfield and we hit the frame twice while a few of our strikers fluffed their lines. Fine margins. I don’t see how Ole could have made the players miss, unless maybe because he pressed the “shoot” button too early or didn’t hold it down long enough.The "poor fitness" excuse is simply laughable. That Huddersfield team that we heroically managed to draw against are the worst team in the PL I have seen in a long long time. They gave us so much space that sometimes I wondered whether they are League 2 side, any decently coached side would have put at least 3 past them. And guess what? We were mostly horrible and scored just because their GK fecked up. It has nothing to do with fitness.
For the bolded bit, what I meant was do feel free to judge him on that. It is indeed a blemish. Being successful in Norway certainly doesn’t equate to success in the Premier League, it shows Ole can excel in that particular context and has some latent management abilities. Similarly his failure at Cardiff suggest to me that he may not work well without the right support, environment and resources. Both cannot be fully translated into Man Utd which is a different beast altogether. I prefer to see it as him having the opportunity and experience to learn.
I say this isn’t his team because he didn’t build it. If you are a working adult you’d see this often: new managers like to hire their own team but of course they might not always be able to do so. It is only natural. Plus I agree with you in that if we attribute the good run we should also attribute the bad. Thus perhaps not so clearly, I am merely expressing that the good runs show that he can get the team to play good football but the bad run shows he needs to work on several things as well, like fitness for example. So if a fan wants to ignore his good run then rightfully his bad run should also be disregarded. But we won’t do that, because each of this situation tells us that there are problems and also there are positives. But the only way to sort the problems and reap the positives is to allow time. As for your question, at the tail end this team is not playing better than the team that started the season, but we saw a significant run in the middle where the team played much better.
I am curious which are these managers that have implemented their philosophy in a short time such as 5 months? Where are these managers and their teams now? I suspect, without statistical backup, that these managers are the exception and not the rule. And I don’t think you can plan a club success based on such low odds. Speaking of low odds, I actually think Ole is a big gamble by the board, but I that I believe will be more positive then the current forum mood suggests. As much as fans like to think we offered Ole the job too quickly, the reality is that it would not have made much difference. Imagine is Ole is not hired, who would our realistic candidates be? Many will say Pochettino but as long as we are judging Ole on the last 10-15 games, Poch’s similar run doesn’t inspire much confidence. Anyway Poch vs Ole is a whole other thread and I will stop here.
I don’t know what the players want or wish to see in a manager. I also don’t know how Ole is when he deals with the players. And neither do most, if not all the fans here, I would wager. These qualities you mentioned in a leader, I wonder how many managers showcase those? Klopp? Zidane? I really don’t know. But I know that LVG and Mourinho are really knowledgeable but they also failed.
So all I see in Ole is a man who has achieved some success and has suffered a failure. He knows the club culture inside out and has also managed the youth team. He has learnt from one of the best managers in the game and he is known to be smart and a very good student of the game. He is also less toxic so far than our previous manager but not as decorated.
The point is so what? Better managers have failed here. Ole has been appointed and we just have to see how he goes and hope he gets the right support and Infrastructure. I see little point in dissecting every sentence during every interview and getting riled up, especially when we know that words in the press mean little.
I am not saying we should support the managers regardless of what happens. With every manager so far, I take the view that they should be supported by the board and fans until circumstances show that the support is not justified. For me the time for Moyes was when he claimed SAF wouldn’t do as well as him, for Mourinho it was the toxicity in the last few weeks. I actually don’t really know why LVG was sacked aside from being an absolute bore - I think he was trying to build something. So with Ole, I think if he hasn’t been appointed yet it would be fair to open up the role to more candidates as doubt creeps in. But since he is already appointed he should be given the time and support. It is not Ole’s fault that he was appointed by the board.
I have seen some really stupid suggestions that Ole should do the honourable and resign. Seriously giving up a dream without a go, on a whimper? That’s not the character I want to see in the manager of a club like Man Utd.
Fans keep saying players are crap/spoiled/etc, the club is incompetent etc. Manager should be sacked etc etc. I can see no path where creating such a negative atmosphere around the club helps the rebuild process. The players and the club’s PR read these forums, no doubt. The negativity here only complicated things and hampers decisions.
This is particularly problematic since Ole hasn’t been given a chance at trying to get his own players in. It is the fastest I have seen fans turn on a manager. This guy hasn’t started the race but the fans want him killed off after the warm up.
In the end, none of us know how he will turn out. I find the negativity extremely tiresome and draining on this forum. Thus I prefer to look at the positives and respect that other posters want to look at negatives. It’s just I am bemused how extremely negative some posters can be.