Sorry, I'll try to make it more clear.
This is stated in the article:
"To get them there, United would give the illusion of a press, pushing the front four of the 4-2-3-1 all the way high, but they wouldn’t actually put on a lot of pressure. The forwards were high but leaving the midfield and defense a bit further back. This discouraged opponents from trying to play long balls in behind the press, and instead try to play through it. "
Authors observation is that the pressing of the forwards wasn't very aggressive so the opponent were able to play through into the middle third where there were then picked up by our midfield.
Author claims that this "illusion" is intentional to steer the opponent to do something we want them to do so "our trap" can work. Sounds like a great idea and a well executed plan, right?
Except this is just the impression of the author! It could very well also be that due to our mostly uncoordinated and not fully comitted forward press (no issue with that, in some games you don't have to press), teams just don't have lot of problems to play through until they get to our usually hardworking and combatitive midfielders where opposition moves then often are stopped. So the author interprets something he sees in a certain way, he depicts it as an intentional thing but doesn't give any evidence that this is "by design" and not just "how things turn out naturally".
Seeing that a lot of the things the claims in the article are somewhat backed up with some stats, this claim isn't - he merely walks on thin ice there.
No team has lost fewer games than Manchester United this season. Sack him, fraud. All just luck.
Losing just four times in 30 games is certainly an achievement the team and the manager can be pretty proud of. Especially seeing as the majority of the losses stem from the beginning of the season where the effects of the bad summer break where still around.
Anyway, the tweet is actually quite witty when you take a more detailed look...
Before the matches yesterday
ManCity -- 31 matches played -- 3 losses
ManUtd -- 30 matches played -- 4 losses
After the matches yesterday
ManCity -- 32 matches played -- 4 losses
ManUtd -- 30 matches played -- 4 losses
Now there comes the tweet - "no team lost fewer than United"
That's a good move, wait for opponent to have his chance to lose before you had your own, then use a "shared first place in number of losses" to get into the limelight. It is a true statement of course but it reminds me to take these "factoids" with a very big pinch of salt. So many out there use these things to gain reactions for themselves...
In the same light, somebody could make the following true statements:
"Manchester United have conceded only 5 goals less than 16th placed Brighton."
"Only 5 teams have more or equally as many draws as Manchester United."