ash_86
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,365
I think we should start expecting consistent results as we get more players back from injury. Watford would be a good match to prove that theory.
Judging a manager is in the end about results. Intelligence or not doesn’t matter.
Ole‘s teams gets results against the top teams but lose to many point against the bottom. Why is that in your opinion? Why is our team better organized, has better intensity, are more clinical and plays with more passions against Chelsea then relegation teams?
Against City and Liverpool (home) we played with one or two touches, our passes was distinct and with accuracy and our movements was good. A week later almost everything is gone and we look like a pub team.
I‘m curious. Is everything about inconsistent players or do you thing coaching, or should I say bad or lack of coaching is one important part in our bad results?
I can never forget that. That has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen happened on a football pitch. And whenever Ole gives an update on injury He always speaks as if He doesn't have a clue about players management or squad rotation at all. It's always the same "He's fine, He'll play through pain" "We need him" "Will come back in a few weeks" even if the players themselves are fecked by his decision to make the squad so thin. It's worrying. Sure the medical team get the most blame but ultimately the manager should be sane enough not to mess around with his player's injury. The cost won't be 3 or 6 points, it can do more harm for the player and ultimately the club in the long run.Going back to last season, he did the same with Lingard when he rushed him out at home to Liverpool, he got injured like 5 mins after coming on. I mean how many incidents do these people need before they realize that this has been a constant theme under Ole?
As if Ole doesn’t rotate in his other clubs? The only reason we are struggling is because we don’t have squad depth. When we do, we will rotate. And not just squad depth by bodies but by talent.I can never forget that. That has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen happened on a football pitch. And whenever Ole gives an update on injury He always speaks as if He doesn't have a clue about players management or squad rotation at all. It's always the same "He's fine, He'll play through pain" "We need him" "Will come back in a few weeks" even if the players themselves are fecked by his decision to make the squad so thin. It's worrying. Sure the medical team get the most blame but ultimately the manager should be sane enough not to mess around with his player's injury. The cost won't be 3 or 6 points, it can do more harm for the player and ultimately the club in the long run.
Nobody told him to sell and loan so many players. In the end We loaned Odion when it's already too late. You shouldn't underestimate what injuries can do to players. I feel really bad for Rashford.As if Ole doesn’t rotate in his other clubs? The only reason we are struggling is because we don’t have squad depth. When we do, we will rotate. And not just squad depth by bodies but by talent.
Nobody told him to sell and loan so many players.
That’s because we needed to change the attitude of the players and those gone didn’t bring the right mentality. But we don’t have the money to buy all at once, that’s all. We wouldn’t have kicked all those players if we decided the change of mentality was more critical for us in the long term.Nobody told him to sell and loan so many players. In the end We loaned Odion when it's already too late. You shouldn't underestimate what injuries can do to players. I feel really bad for Rashford.
Who do you mean by they? Liverpool? I don't think Liverpool just play counter attacking. And you need to beat both good and crap teams. Don't how you can think you can be top of the table just by beating good teams and losing/ drawing against majority (crap) of the teams in the league.Think this is the crux of the matter and it bothers me to no end as well. It cant be just a matter of tactics, because if all if took to beat the good teams were "counterattack lol" then they would not be on top of the table. As you said, we play with much more passion and drive in the big games. We seem sharp and focused, where as in some other games (like Burnley recently) so many of the players seemed like they could not give half a feck.
Ole talked a lot about a culture change and people brushed it off as nonsense, but after seeing how the season plays out and the recent interview Fred gave i firmly believe we have had and still have some severe problems with attitude in our squad.
Jose was in no shape or form innocent in his own sacking, but there is no doubt that a pretty sizable portion of the squad had downed tools in his last season. Then Ole comes in and we win 12 games in a row, and every single player is playing with their hearts on their sleeves. Ole gets appointed permanent and we go from great to complete shit overnight. Some of it no doubt down to fatigue and injuries, but not all of it i believe.
Now ideally Ole (or any other manager) would have this lot fall in line and pull in the same direction right away, but i dont think its that easy.
Here's Borrusia Monchengladbach playing some beautiful attacking football with a squad that's not as good as ours.
Did they need VVD and Alisson like Roy Keane said you do?
Who do you mean by they? Liverpool? I don't think Liverpool just play counter attacking. And you need to beat both good and crap teams. Don't how you can think you can be top of the table just by beating good teams and losing/ drawing against majority (crap) of the teams in the league.
The reason I think the players look like they don't care against these crap teams is because its frustrating play against them as they are so well organised and coached to defend, intercept passes, or close down passing angles. It saps out the enthusiasm if you can't more than a few passes with the general lack of coordination. Its like if you had a good supervisor/manager at work he/she can guide you and things seem so simple, without which you are overwhelmed and don't know where to begin. Whereas against the big teams, they are afforded more space as the opponent team is more focused on attacking than defending coupled with the excitement of playing against better players.
Better players = better results
Let's see from here on in how things go. We finally have a sorted defence in place with a fair bit of depth and the midfield is in much better shape with the arrival of bruno, consistent good form of Fred and return of Mctominay.
Even in attack, we've managed to get a forward on loan, so we have a little depth there as well as support from greenwood and James.
Very few excuses now, if we don't make top 4 and go deep into the europa stages, especially with Chelsea on the rut that they are and spurs going through an injury crisis.
If he still manages to miss top 4 from this position, then we should definitely change things in the summer. But if we do get top 4 and or the europa then I hope he continues into the summer, mainly because his work with youth, squad culture, signings and getting rid of deadwood has been great.
Here's Borrusia Monchengladbach playing some beautiful attacking football with a squad that's not as good as ours.
It sure would be amazing to face sides in the premier league that let you make 4 passes in their box.
If barcelona 2009 install me as a manager, I'd go on vacation and ask my assistant to manage them for me. Would still probably won the liga.
Does it make me a league winner quality manager?
Yes. With better player there are better result. But how on par is it? Even moyes can get top 4 if he was given 1billion to spend, he got 4th once with everton.
My biggest fear is that we spend another 400m and another 2 years of excuse, and ole fluke a top 4 or top 3 then we'll be having him for another 10 year.
My biggest worry with moyes wasnt losing point, my biggest worry under him was that we got lucky top 4 and he gets to live to his 6 year contract.
It sure would be amazing to face sides in the premier league that let you make 4 passes in their box.
Personally, I'd keep them as bench warmers for one more season (or half a season, if possible) to prevent players like Rashford getting knackered and playing through injuries. They will also increase our chance to get top 4 regardless if They score some dodgy goals from long balls. With top 4 in our hands, it'll be easier to attract better players, that is when We get rid of them.That’s because we needed to change the attitude of the players and those gone didn’t bring the right mentality. But we don’t have the money to buy all at once, that’s all. We wouldn’t have kicked all those players if we decided the change of mentality was more critical for us in the long term.
When you talk about players attitude and fighting and all that, the first person he sold was our biggest fighter, Fellaini. The man gives 100% all the time inspite of all the hate. He has no clue about playing football or the coaches have no clue.
Professional players look to the coach to get them to win matches. If things are not working out or the tactics are not working then they look at the coach to sort things out. If the coach cannot sort things out ( as is happening at United lots of times now) then the players get disillusioned. I think this has happened at United. In public, they will back the manager but in their hearts they know that he does not have the capability to compete with the top managers.
It's funny how so many are sympathetic with that Spurs are having a tough time now. And Mourhino goes full passive agressive mode saying we dont have a bullet in our gun and he would have liked RB Leipzig's bench players.
Quite a comparison for how much stick United have gotten beeing without Pogba most of the season, Martial for a while, and now Rashford. Not to mention how Solskjærs eternal optimism tries to uphold the optimism.
I don’t think any United fan feels sorry for Mourinho. He’s doing the all things he did with us with Spurs. The game yesterday could well have been Sevilla home and away.
The reason why Solskjaer excels against the top four and is bad against the rest of the league is because he is a defensive minded manager. We can absorb pressure when the impetus isn't on us to hold possession and "snatch a goal" but the moment we are required to dictate a game we often just end up losing.
We need an attack minded manager to coach a system and individually develop a large majority of our starting 11. The video of Rose's tactical fluidity in Germany is the exact profile of candidate we should be looking at. You don't need good players to play attacking football.
Yes, i didnt mean United fans mostly, more the general media and fan base.
The reason why Solskjaer excels against the top four and is bad against the rest of the league is because he is a defensive minded manager.
No it just means he spent 130M on defenders last summer and until recently had to make do with Lingard, Pereira and a well past expiry date Mata as the creative outlets in attack.
also because he has no frikken idea how to break up teams and knwo sonly how to counter.No it just means he spent 130M on defenders last summer and until recently had to make do with Lingard, Pereira and a well past expiry date Mata as the creative outlets in attack.
Yeah I can see the point but I think we had a choice to make and Ole made the difficult choice. It's a brave one, one that could potentially kill his career forever so we owe him a big one for that. Now, I don't think he expected us to struggle that much but sometimes, things don't go according to the plan. He is adapting now to the new reality of having injuries that are trickier and players not up to the level.Personally, I'd keep them as bench warmers for one more season (or half a season, if possible) to prevent players like Rashford getting knackered and playing through injuries. They will also increase our chance to get top 4 regardless if They score some dodgy goals from long balls. With top 4 in our hands, it'll be easier to attract better players, that is when We get rid of them.
Solksjaer is not a defensive manager when he played with Molde so I think that's just the way he is approaching the game with the personnel we have. And btw, no defensive manager would commit 8 players in attack to force a 2/5/3 or 2/4/1/2 as we seem to play in offensive phases with the latest 3/4/3. That's a lot of players going forward.The reason why Solskjaer excels against the top four and is bad against the rest of the league is because he is a defensive minded manager. We can absorb pressure when the impetus isn't on us to hold possession and "snatch a goal" but the moment we are required to dictate a game we often just end up losing.
We need an attack minded manager to coach a system and individually develop a large majority of our starting 11. The video of Rose's tactical fluidity in Germany is the exact profile of candidate we should be looking at. You don't need good players to play attacking football.
Let's see how we do it ourselves against Spurs?I wonder how Leipzig did it yesterday
That's because in his 2 first years winning the league, at Molde, he played possession based football, and he has been influenced by Pep in that regard. But then he changed, probably because of players being sold and therefore not having the ability to continue that kind of football. I think he's a guy who plays a lot like Klopp because he sees more chances of that securing long term wins + he doesn't think a style is set in stone forever, that's really what this is all about.Well... I think it has alot to do with our current midfield players as well.
None of them (bar Pogba and now hopefully Bruno) excels in keeping and recycling possession.
If Pogba gets back or we buy an replacement in Graelish or Maddison + a good CDM, I think we would be better suited to more calmness in the midfield and more forward thinking outside of counters.
But yeah, it seems it is the way he want to play I agree. It is kinda strange seeing he seems to emulate Liverpool under Klopp the first years but always praises City and how they play.