He'sRaldo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2019
- Messages
- 3,206
Why not?Well he shouldn’t name drop him then.
Why not?Well he shouldn’t name drop him then.
Easy ammunition for some of the rabid fanbase.Why not?
What do you mean by from the horses mouth?
It’s a term used to describe getting information directly from someone rather than via a third party.
But you have to realise we need a major overhaul. Lukaku has confirmed he wanted to leave in March itself so why would you want to force a player to stay on. There can only be two things that might have happened a) Ole was content with this squad or b) the board failed to back him as he expected. I chose to believe the later as it was Ole who said in April he will be making major changes with new players and then in July after we bought AWB he said he is looking for 3 more players and only to reduce that number to 1. All in all it has been poor stuff by the board and even Ole for not coming out open with the issue.
Ask Pogba.
As for the major overhaul, was that the opinion in his first 3 months ?
He speaks a little about it here. If you are interestedAsk Pogba.
As for the major overhaul, was that the opinion in his first 3 months ?
I would say yes, I still wasn't overly confident in the squad we had. We had lots of duds who needed to be sold. Maybe one can argue that he chose to ship the wrong players but then one can also argue from his side that Herrera was always going to leave as he wanted more, Smalling wanted to leave as Ole could not guarantee him first team football, Sanchez is Sanchez and Lukaku I already stated my point.
In the last 4 transfer windows including this we have added 6 players which include a third choice keeper, a winger from a championship and a raw right back in Dalot and in that process have let go 8 players. SO in total 6 ins and 8 outs. SO don't you think we need to buy more quality irrespective of the manager.
Let us review our squad
Keeper: I would say we are fine in that department but I won't mind promoting Henderson and selling De gea
Full backs: Shaw has been here for almost 6 years and has shown very little growth. Rest are very young and need to be developed properly.
Centre back: maguire seems the only guy so far who should be a regular. Rest the jury is still not out. Lindelof has been ok but is he someone who can help us challenge for the title, Not sure. Maybe he like Fred can improve even more. Bailly and Rojo are too injury prone and Tuanzebe seems to be joining that list. Less said about Jones the better.
Midfield: Pogba, McTominay and Fred are our first three choice midfielder. Matic has been decent when called upon but he would have been sold had McTominay and Pogba stayed fit. Less said about Periera the better.
Attack: Take out rashford and Martial we have zero attack. Expecting a 18 year old to solve everything is not correct. Lingard, Mata are best as squad players. James is still raw.
Now tell me don't you think we would need at least 4 players and that is presuming Pogba stays, if not make that 5 or even 6. This is why not buying anyone this January is baffling.
He speaks a little about it here. If you are interested
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...olskjaer-can-fulfil-ambitions-manchester/amp/
But how do you know Ole did not want strikers and midfielders to replace Lukaku and Herrera respectively. How do you know he didn't ask Lukaku to stay but he already made up his mind to play for Inter. Did you forget him posing with a Inter shirt on even before the deal was agreed. Lukaku and POgba are two different individuals. Lukaku has come out and said he was looking for a move since March, so don't you think the club should have handled it better.Why are you assuming that anyone who wants to leave we should simply allow him to go ? As I said above ask Pogba. He came in force with his agents both talking in summer about wanting a new challenge and so, and he's still here, with the club firmly refusing to let him, so the idea we let these players go because they just asked too is wrong. We also let them go because Ole wasn't that concerned about losing them, and the club didn't care much either, unlike Pogba, who the club is refusing to sell at all costs.
The squad now currently is very poor, no one will argue on that but for me it was far better when Ole got the job and it proved during his initial months that we had a good set of players back then and needed few key additions in defense and midfield to become much better. The fact that one full summer and 150m spent and the squad now is in far worse shape than his initial 3 months is just poor in general. If the midfield and attack are that fecked up he could have always spent the 150m on a midfielder and an attacker instead of Maguire and kept Smalling for one more season. We could have canceled Lukaku's deal in the last day and kept him for say 6 more months till Jan to try and sign another striker, then sell him. Plenty of options, but as mentioned in Ole's above quote, he analyzed the squad and thought splashing 80m on Maguire to replace Smalling was totally worth it even if it meant the majority of the budget is now gone and we might not get a midfielder or attacker to replace the goners. He holds as much blame for the current squad problems as much as Woodward. That's not to mention how he dealt with Pogba's, Scott's and Rashford's injuries that aggravated them and led to us spending long time with each one of them, because he rushed them all earlier.
Woodward is a crap negotiator but he doesn't choose the plan for the summer, the chosen targets or the priorities. The manager does.
Currently yeah we need a major overhaul but after last summer and its outcomes I have zero faith in Ole (and neither in Woodward too) to do such a job.
But how do you know Ole did not want strikers and midfielders to replace Lukaku and Herrera respectively. How do you know he didn't ask Lukaku to stay but he already made up his mind to play for Inter. Did you forget him posing with a Inter shirt on even before the deal was agreed. Lukaku and POgba are two different individuals. Lukaku has come out and said he was looking for a move since March, so don't you think the club should have handled it better.
Yes Ole could have and should have handled everything better, considering he was here since December, but maybe just maybe Woodward being Woodward screwed things up. Weren't we after Dybala like just at the final minutes of the WIndow. The point is whether it be Van gaal or Jose or now Ole , Woodward has proven to be a pathetic negotiator. I can blame OLe for many things but to blame him for not buying a striker or midfielder when he said in July after we bought AWB and James that he was looking to secure 3 to 4 players shows it was the board who did the poor job.
So Oles confirmed that our summer warchest was pitiful. Maguire + AWB in simplistic terms was £130m. We got 75m for Lukaku which we would have planned for since we knew he was leaving. So our budget again wasn’t far off the 70m mark.
All the bs about dybala and bruno in the summer then was exactly that, bs
I noticed that too.....lot of noise to keep fans alienated but the end result remains the same- 70 to 80 million net spend per year.So Oles confirmed that our summer warchest was pitiful. Maguire + AWB in simplistic terms was £130m. We got 75m for Lukaku which we would have planned for since we knew he was leaving. So our budget again wasn’t far off the 70m mark.
All the bs about dybala and bruno in the summer then was exactly that, bs
It’s going to be a disappointing couple of Windows I think
Due to the quote above, in which he mentioned he spent the majority of the budget on the defense because he thought we needed to defend more, so he knew the budget available for him and our prime target in the marker was to reinforce the defense with most of our budget while midfield and attack came as secondary objectives. We haven't targeted any other midfielder after Longstaff and the only striker we were interested in was Mandzukic, the 34 years old. Nothing really that shows the midfield or attack were priority for us this summer. Woodward is a crap negotiator bur he doesn't choose the targets to negotiate with.
As long as a player is under contract we're in full control of his future and we can agree or refuse to let him go as much as we want. We were just not concerned about him leaving, and the opened the door for him to go, while the door was firmly shut in front of Pogba's face from the start.
No one has defended Woodward, the guy is a terrible CEO and a crap negotiator, and he's the main denominator in all our failure post SAF. I don't think anyone is convinced otherwise, regardless of their stance on the current manager. The main point of difference in opinions is that some think Ole also holds a responsibility for our current situation, alongside Ed.
I noticed that too.....lot of noise to keep fans alienated but the end result remains the same- 70 to 80 million net spend per year.
Our only hope is that our youngsters continue to improve and we manage to unearth some gems like James. (But James is rather the exception in our case)
Of course in hindsight he should have done differently.
Rojo did his ACL in 17/18 and since then has played very little. Baily had knee surgery scheduled and is now barely back, Jones constantly get injured as well. 3/5 CB's at the club has very dubious fitness records which meant that if we did not buy Maguire we would have gone into the season with Smalling/Lindelof as our CB pairing. A long term injury to one of those two we would be in deep shit as we would have to rely on Jones+1, which is not ideal. Pogba thus far in his career has had an excellent injury record and has missed more games this season alone than his whole career combined. No one could predict he would miss most of the season too injury. Say if we spent the budget on a CM instead and then say Lindelof was out for half a year, we would be in big trouble as well. Buying a RB was really a no brainer. I'd say in the summer (before factoring in any injuries) i would say it was about 50/50 on buying a CB and CM as both were needed.
Lukaku wanted away. No point in keeping him around. Losing Herrera was a damn shame, but that was mostly down to Woodys ineptitude of handling contracts.
The sad reality is that we have the second highest wage bill in the league and not the quality to show for it. This is not the result of this summer window, but rather years and years of poor scouting, poor investment and we handing out ridiculous contracts to under performing players. I've said it before, but considering our investment the last two years have only been half of what LvG and Jose got to spend in their first two windows, i think its very plausible the owners has tightened the purse strings, and demanded we trim the wage bill before we went out and buy new players
The problem is that (outside of Lukaku and Herrera), none of the players sold under Ole had any real market value to other clubs as they were all deadwood. When you look at our remaining deadwood, they dont have much value either
Rojo: Headless chickens and very injury prone.
Baily: Headless chickens and very injury prone.
Jones: Headless chickens and very injury prone.
Shaw: Always injured and has not developed at all the last 2-3 years
Matic: Past it
Pereira: Not EPL quality
Lindgard: Not EPL quality
Mata: Past it
If we are lucky, some lower table EPL teams are maybe willing to fork out 10-15 million for the British players (a bit more for Shaw), but i sincerely doubt any of the other ones would be interesting targets. We have seen 7 players go and just 3 come in, and in my opinion the ones above also need to be moved on, so that's another 8 players that we ideally should clear out.
Regardless of any ones views on Ole as manager I think this transfer window (if it remains like this) just basically confirms what we all already know- who’s in charge is irrelevant we’ve no chance with this recruitment process past, present or future. We may as well all give up caring and arguing amongst ourselves and use the rest of the season in protest at this recruitment strategy and lack of spending.
Bingo. That’s the truth the Ole in brigade don’t want to admit. It’s the romanticism and nothing else.Okay, lets say he took over a sinking ship as you say. He then got a fresh start with them in an easier division the next season, with a lot of players bought in the transfer market, infact they bought 9 and got rid of most of Mackay's men and Solskjaer had a team he wanted, entirely of his own making, then guess what, he was shockingly bad again and was sacked, i mean what more do you want, fresh season, a whole new team bought for him, and he fails. But somehow he's going to miraculously do it with this team? Why? Come on. You also skipped over my point with his previous team doing much better after he left.
Just say it, you think he's going to succeed because he used to play for us, and that's the only reason, it's not because of experience, skill or acumen, it's because he used to play for us, that is it.
I bet he'd bite your hand off to have Smalling, Lukaku, and Fellaini, back in the team just now.
He's been hung out to dry, and hopefully the fans will continue to call out the real culprits here.
OGS willingly let all 3 go.
This idea that Woodward screwed him over is a myth.
OGS willingly let all 3 go.
This idea that Woodward screwed him over is a myth.
I just posted an interview where he said clearly that every player leaving needed to be replaced. If you want to focus on the latter statement that he was happy with the squad, that is fine. Although not very intelligent. Especially when he know he got a lot of work to do integrating youngsters. I don’t think Woody screwed him over, but I do believe he failed to deliver what was a list of players wanted. Just like we see at this very moment. Best part of it is, because he acts like a man and gets on with it, the warriors of the internet comes out like trolls in the night calling him a puppetOGS willingly let all 3 go.
This idea that Woodward screwed him over is a myth.
Other than Smalling, he willingly let them go in the knowledge they wouldn't be replaced? Utter rubbish.
I'm trying my best to support him, but he simply is not the man.
He talks about rebuilding, when we keep booting players without replacing them, and when he keeps giving our deadwood second, third and 20th chances, while ignoring promising youngsters, alienating them in the process. And not a single criticism of the board not backing him with transfers, which infuriates me the most.
So Oles confirmed that our summer warchest was pitiful. Maguire + AWB in simplistic terms was £130m. We got 75m for Lukaku which we would have planned for since we knew he was leaving. So our budget again wasn’t far off the 70m mark.
All the bs about dybala and bruno in the summer then was exactly that, bs
It’s going to be a disappointing couple of Windows I think
He literally said Greenwood would be 'promoted' and would play a key role. He never wanted to replace Lukaku for this season.
He signed Maguire to 'replace' Smalling.
He didn't target a midfielder at all. He had a budget and direct quotes from him state, how he wanted to spend the majority of it on defenders to improve our defense.
I'm not the one talking rubbish here.
I know that’s not what he meant by it but I’m reading between the lines - we had no money left (or time as it turns out) for attackersI didn’t read what he was saying as that at all. I don’t think he was talking in terms of a budget, he just pointed out that majority of money we spent in the summer was on defenders which is true. I don’t think he was saying “I had a fixed budget and chose to spend the majority of it on defenders”, he was simply saying “in the summer most of the money we spent was on defenders”.
This wouldn't surprise me
So you are suggesting Ole is responsible for bringing in players hence he is also responsible for the current state of the squad. So why should he deserve credit for selling players without replacing them first and leave the squad so weak?
He let those three go and those roles were supposed to be taken over by Maguire who the club spent an absolute fortune on, McTominay who's been promoted to the first team and was having a break out season and finally Rashford/Martial/Greenwood who were more than making up for the goal scoring load.
There's been misfortune with injuries and the club should have added some padding to the squad to absorb those blows but lets not argue like Einsteins with the benefit of hindsight.
It was more the performance than the result, best one I’ve seen at the Etihad could have easily had five by halftime.
Nonsense, this was said to smooth things over after Dybala and Mandzuckic blew us out, why would he want those two if he thought Greenwood was up to it all along.
He would have been out of his mind not to want a midfielder, Longstaff was talked about all summer long if I remember correctly.