Jim Beam
Gets aroused by men in low socks
my usual draft game, am really gonna miss it
He's quite versatile. He's played as sweeper, DM, CM, B2B, and even almost an AM type in one setup. He's left footed so probably will prefer the left of midfield but I don't see it as an issue and he's played on the right before particularly when playing with Gargano or Duscher.@Himannv wasn't Cambiasso better to the left of the midfield or as the 6?
He's quite versatile. He's played as sweeper, DM, CM, B2B, and even almost an AM type in one setup. He's left footed so probably will prefer the left of midfield but I don't see it as an issue and he's played on the right before particularly when playing with Gargano or Duscher.
There aren't too many things to question - I think it's a solid enough team, but not as entertaining as the possession-based juggernauts you usually draft.Pretty disappointed about the lack of tactical questions...
I don't like Rooney on the right much because he's so one dimensional when playing there. Once you realize he's only going to cut in every single time, it can be easy to defend against. I'm also not particularly convinced by Carboni's peak as he's a bit older during that time frame (mid 30s to 40 if my memory serves me right). Still a good player, of course, but not sure why you didn't take an earlier version.
What were you going for at the beginning out of interest?
I don't agree regarding Rooney. He just constantly cuts in and he's actually fantastic if people don't realize he's going to do that, but I do think it's one dimensional and a top defence will deal with it.Disagree 1st, agree 2nd. Carboni is shit, like he was solid and that's it.
Was going for Mourinho Inter version.
But, I absolutely love Rooney on the side, his peak and no doubt in my mind was 06'-09' and he was a different animal. The idea that he and Eto'o defend and track back in Jose system seemed great to me. And think people really forget what a force of nature he was (before wanna pick you up in the morning Rio drunk tweets).
I don't agree regarding Rooney. He just constantly cuts in and he's actually fantastic if people don't realize he's going to do that, but I do think it's one dimensional and a top defence will deal with it.
Mourinho's Inter is a great setup actually. I was inspired to try it at some point myself after watching Mourinho's masterclass on YouTube for the game against Barca. I'd have prioritized Zanetti though because of the tactic he used by playing him on the right against Messi - but perhaps this isn't the draft for it considering who was banned.
Are you still banging on about Zlatan?You must use this games to clear false narratives. And you wanker have a special place in my heart.
Eric said "Am here it is alright" on his first press conference. You used it as a life motto. But Eric never said a word after, you just couldn't stop talking which does my head in whenever someone mentions you in the same breath.
Primary concern would be him being offended and playing barefoot as a result. "Zlatan doesn't fill anyone's boots, anyone's boots are too small for Zlatan".
It's not meant to be like for like, hence why the OP says "based roughly". It's a similar tactical setup. I'm not expecting Gazza to play like Petit for example. Gazza will be Gazza.@Himannv the France 98 stuff is very interesting but I don't see all that much similarity in the staffing other than the like for like CB pair and Ashley Cole.
Tagline checks out.lions dont play with boots anyways
Thought so. When I suggested someone made your picks he was the one I thought was definitely a goner in the next turn.He is brilliant. Honestly, underrated as a midfielder and wouldn't be out of place for me even in a bigger pool.
Also often covered for Maicon runs in Jose scheme so he is at home on the right.
It's not meant to be like for like, hence why the OP says "based roughly". It's a similar tactical setup. I'm not expecting Gazza to play like Petit for example. Gazza will be Gazza.
The formation, structure, and objectives will be the same and, of course, some roles will be similar, like Zlatan playing the role of Guivar'ch as you pointed out.
It really answers a question (that I think you raised) from a previous game. How do we get the ball? Also answers questions like - How do we play? What will our defensive structure be like? How do we approach this game? Emphasis on the system fundamentally, not necessarily and exact player match.
Hoping to do the same. Being in the middle is also a bitch when reinforcing, always get sloppy seconds, so we'll see.I think it will all change in the next game if we do get through. My modus operandi is to use different tactical setups for each tie normally.
Thought so. When I suggested someone made your picks he was the one I thought was definitely a goner in the next turn.
Suggested Sneijder, Cambiasso and Pandev roles (somehow brainfarted and forgot Rooney) getting Sneijder, Cambiasso (or Verón as something a bit different) and, err, Claudio López who you obviously didn't need
I think it will all change in the next game if we do get through. My modus operandi is to use different tactical setups for each tie normally.
I was about to pick him and thought it was a bit shit with you having missed three picks. It was definitely going to start a run on midfielders, which it did.
I had him as the ultimate backup pick that wouldn't go for ages. A safety net but with a sting.Every time I wanna say something in my advantage can't help to see that wanker Andy
Thanks Invi!
How could they missed him??
I did want Deschamps originally in fairness, but I view Gilberto Silva as a poor man's Deschamps personally. I wanted Cambiasso to be the player who would combine with Deschamps/Silva and be an option for that first pass due to his excellent quick distributions that could engage the front three. As such, my intention was to not shackle him too much with defensive duties.Yeah sure, that's why I appreciated the breakdown as the way you want to go about things.
I obviously don't expect an exact replica, the point in a draft is you could actually improve just by deploying a far better player for the exact same role. E.g. Guivar'ch.
In some cases though the variation is pretty odd, e.g. Cambiasso is a much better fit for Deschamps than Gilberto. While most of your tactics charts have Deschamps "just there" in the middle he was huge for France (and for Zidane at club level too). Gilberto doesn't really cut it for me there. Rather have him as a poor man's Vieira/Karembeu than poor man's Deschamps.
Somewhat similar with the AMs. Zidane and Djorkaeff played central and it worked, so why make Baggio/Gullit drift wide? They can? Yes and it's useful they are well suited for it. Should that be their default instruction though? Why?
The blueprint helps, but brings up a whole raft of new questions re what is different and how or why it makes it better.
Hoping to do the same. Being in the middle is also a bitch when reinforcing, always get sloppy seconds, so we'll see.
But yeah, there's no fun in eventually sticking Ronaldo instead of Crespo and going "look! it's Ronaldo! goals, goals, goals!"
Keane also recalls how he asked Carlos Queiroz if made love to his wife in the same position every night when the Portuguese dismissed his suggestion that they should mix up training a bit.
"I said, you change the position, don't you? Sometimes you have to mix up training a little bit. That's all I'm saying. That's coming from all the players. It's not a personal thing'.
"I haven't a clue why I said that - and I still don't."
That's all I'm saying. That's coming from all the players. It's not a personal thing'.
I did want Deschamps originally in fairness, but I view Gilberto Silva as a poor man's Deschamps personally. I wanted Cambiasso to be the player who would combine with Deschamps/Silva and be an option for that first pass due to his excellent quick distributions that could engage the front three. As such, my intention was to not shackle him too much with defensive duties.
Love your next question. To be honest I found the tactic of attacking through the middle too limiting hence my changes to the tactics there. You see, I watched the finals against Brazil for the second time ever when I prepared for this. There were instances I felt that France were missing a trick. Bobby C and Cafu were both leaving acres of spaces in behind them and I felt France were not always capitalizing on those spaces simply because it was not part of their tactics to play that way. I felt that giving a tactical instruction to also attack wider would have given their attack a new dimension.
Don't think they are, they'll just stop being invulnerable. In any case, it was an unrealistic example anyway as Iso is still in it and there's no way the chap in the middle grabs Ronaldo when/if available.I think the first two picks are blocked so there wouldn't be an option to get Ronaldo anyway. As such, I think tactical flexibility is probably a good approach.
Was a pleasure, Mr Beam.
To be fair I voted you because he would shit all over Gilberto.As I said, nothing but love.
Andy feckin Möller