OverratedOpinion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2017
- Messages
- 8,488
Salah or Haaland for captain in the next fantasy football fixtures?
I would fancy Haaland to get at least 2 against Bournemouth. Palace can be a bit of a bogie side for Liverpool.
Salah or Haaland for captain in the next fantasy football fixtures?
I would fancy Haaland to get at least 2 against Bournemouth. Palace can be a bit of a bogie side for Liverpool.
That was my thinking too TBH
That's my biggest worry with him. How to keep that huge frame injury free in a sport where there is as much running as football.I don't think anyone denies that Jamie Vardy was a good/great striker. Aubameyang is another one.
Man City have a 22 year old striker, who's base level is already at Jamie Vardy's best. The thinking is that Haaland will get even better because he's an insane athlete (he's fecking huge), and has room to develop technically.
Yes, but then there are multiple strikers who are great at that and have had massive success with that. Like Jamie Vardy.
Agreed but Haaland has an exceptional burst of speed over a few yards which is usually all he'll need given City's usual slow, patient build up.I think if they had a foot race people would be surprised. Mbappe would win but it would be neck and neck.
Mbappe is much faster with the ball mind.
Haaland is very very fast.
If they sprint half a field, i actually think Haaland would get over first.
I’d say it’s a matter of distance; shorter ones: 30m; 50m; 60m, it’s Mbappè, but once the distance opens up: 100m; 150m and definitely by 200m, Haaland would come out on top.I think if they had a foot race people would be surprised. Mbappe would win but it would be neck and neck.
Mbappe is much faster with the ball mind.
Maybe look outside of Europe.?
I’d say it’s a matter of distance; shorter ones: 30m; 50m; 60m, it’s Mbappè, but once the distance opens up: 100m; 150m and definitely by 200m, Haaland would come out on top.
That's fair. Simple question of biomechanics of a shorter versus a taller athlete. Mbappe's acceleration curve is sharper over 10-40m. He's built more like your typical 60m specialist, and gets to his top speed quicker with a quicker cadence. Meanwhile Haaland at 6ft 4' is closer to the leggy build of a typical 200m runner,. There is a caveat though. Haaland has extreme power which enables him to explode over 5 yards or so. He's blessed with the genetics to hold the under-6 world record for the standing long jump, which reflects @Gentleman Jim's point about his dynamism in small spaces, eg in finding gaps in the box.I’d say it’s a matter of distance; shorter ones: 30m; 50m; 60m, it’s Mbappè, but once the distance opens up: 100m; 150m and definitely by 200m, Haaland would come out on top.
It’s redundant on a football pitch though, where Mbappè is simply designed to look like the faster player, and relative to a football pitch, he is.
@Gio what say you?
"under 6 World record?"
He competed for standing long jump when he was 5?
That's fair. Simple question of biomechanics of a shorter versus a taller athlete. Mbappe's acceleration curve is sharper over 10-40m. He's built more like your typical 60m specialist, and gets to his top speed quicker with a quicker cadence. Meanwhile Haaland at 6ft 4' is closer to the leggy build of a typical 200m runner,. There is a caveat though. Haaland has extreme power which enables him to explode over 5 yards or so. He's blessed with the genetics to hold the under-6 world record for the standing long jump, which reflects @Gentleman Jim's point about his dynamism in small spaces, eg in finding gaps in the box.
I'd think so too.Haaland is very very fast.
If they sprint half a field, i actually think Haaland would get over first.
I have wondered how long such a big body can withstand the rigours of all those explosive movements. His knees and calves in particular having double and triple force jolted through them.That's fair. Simple question of biomechanics of a shorter versus a taller athlete. Mbappe's acceleration curve is sharper over 10-40m. He's built more like your typical 60m specialist, and gets to his top speed quicker with a quicker cadence. Meanwhile Haaland at 6ft 4' is closer to the leggy build of a typical 200m runner,. There is a caveat though. Haaland has extreme power which enables him to explode over 5 yards or so. He's blessed with the genetics to hold the under-6 world record for the standing long jump, which reflects @Gentleman Jim's point about his dynamism in small spaces, eg in finding gaps in the box.
I have wondered how long such a big body can withstand the rigours of all those explosive movements. His knees and calves in particular having double and triple force jolted through them.
In terms of the size to power ratio, he does veer into the Bolt level of freakishness (relative to a footballer) in that such a massive man is obviously going to kick on to a ridiculous top speed in full stride, but to even challenge smaller athletes out the gates is bizarre in the extreme. Haaland's top speeds aren't likely to be a surprise to many, but getting away in the first few steps is just freakish; we normally say that the larger/taller pacey players are rapid... once they get going... but I can't think of any (6'3"+) who are blistering out the traps like this kid.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he was quite broken by that age; most truly rapid players are done by that age or have emphatically modified their game; if not knees, then generally hamstrings destroy them and on the odd occasion, it’ll be the back that can no longer function.Yeah he has a acceleration of a small guy for some reason. I'd say over the first 10 yards he leaves guys like Sane behind which is crazy.
I do worry about how his body holds up long term as he relies far more on his physical attributes than someone like zlatan for example.
I do have this fear for the kid that hell be practically done in his late 20s
Listened to his post match interview. His english is pretty much "norwegian level", even a bit better speedwise. The rest of it is due to his norwegian dialect, a bit Salzburg/ BVB, and his general short cut way of expressing himself. If you youtube "jærsk dialekt" you'll find the roots of his accent.Not relevant to anything, but I wonder why Haaland - who was born in the UK and raised in Norway where people generally speak English very well - speaks a somewhat broken English with a sort of central European accent. It can´t from a couple of years in AustrIa and Germany, so I think it might be an image think. A bit like Sancho and, to a larger extent, Joey Barton in France.
Alot of good points here. Hes accleration seems a bit underrated. Combined with hes strenght its possible the freakiest guy on pace/power i seen in football. Yeah you have players with more ball control and so on. But theese runs without the ball looks just diffrent from the rest of the fast bunch...
Listened to his post match interview. His english is pretty much "norwegian level", even a bit better speedwise. The rest of it is due to his norwegian dialect, a bit Salzburg/ BVB, and his general short cut way of expressing himself. If you youtube "jærsk dialekt" you'll find the roots of his accent.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he was quite broken by that age; most truly rapid players are done by that age or have emphatically modified their game; if not knees, then generally hamstrings destroy them and on the odd occasion, it’ll be the back that can no longer function.
Haaland already makes uncoachable runs and instinctively knows what to do and when, so I’d expect he can modify that aspect to not rely as heavily on pace, but being clean through for shots off what would have once been from those same runs will diminish, as we’ve seen with so many others.
Shearer was never as fast as Haaland, but he was once reliant on his pace to work angles for himself and played a very clean, breakaway game - he modified his game so much when he lost his pace, people who didn’t see his younger iteration swear he was always a hurly burly bruiser. Maybe Haaland will learn to use his body in the more conventional ways once/if his pace and athletic prowess diminishes. Relative to his size, he’s dire in basic Zlatan-sequel tussles and scrambles at the moment, but if forced to do the nitty gritty like so many others had to beyond a certain degradation, we’ll see what comes of that.
There's no "norwegian way" of speaking english. This fellow is laconic and doesn't love interviews, which probably is the biggest influence.I am familiar with his Norwegian dialect, but still don´t think it translates to the way he speaks English.
Yeah he has a acceleration of a small guy for some reason. I'd say over the first 10 yards he leaves guys like Sane behind which is crazy.
I do worry about how his body holds up long term as he relies far more on his physical attributes than someone like zlatan for example.
I do have this fear for the kid that hell be practically done in his late 20s
Have you looked. You seem to have all information on this.Nope, there isn’t anyone ….he’s a one of a kind.
Many great players never came to Europe.There are very few players in Europe of Haaland's quality. There's certainly none outside of Europe. If they were as good as him they'd be playing in Europe.
Alot of good points here. Hes accleration seems a bit underrated. Combined with hes strenght its possible the freakiest guy on pace/power i seen in football. Yeah you have players with more ball control and so on. But theese runs without the ball looks just diffrent from the rest of the fast bunch...
Many great players never came to Europe.
Quite sure if there was anyone comparable to Haaland he would have been found by nowHave you looked. You seem to have all information on this.
A little dissapointed he didnt score today. How was he today besides not scoring?