We’d be singing a different song if Rodgers was at KC and Mahomes was stuck with the infuriating ineptitude of LaFleur though.
It’s a fair point for sure. But we set different standards for different QBs.
You always hear Brady is only good because of the system.
We don’t hear that Mahomes is only good because of the system.
We always hear Rodgers sucks because of the system.
We don’t hear about Brees and what he might be like in another system.
When do we talk about Rivers and what he might do under Reid? Or if Mariota hadn’t been surrounded by crap coaches and changes his entire career?
I’m not saying you can’t consider systems, coaches etc. I’m just saying that it’s a “what if” criteria which is applied inconsistently to various QBs in different ways.
No doubt Rodgers would be better and Mahomes worse if they switched teams. But by how much? How do we know how each might do? We don’t. That’s why sometimes you just have to take a step back and decide on what you see with consideration to all those factors (there are indeed many to factor in) but not be blinded by them.
Anyway, my comment was a little in spite of course. I firmly believe and said it last year too that Mahomes has taken things to another level. Forget the stats and coaches, just watch him. The way he combines athleticism with wits, his accuracy yet arm strength. His ability to read and play from the pocket yet scramble. I think it’s another level. When things g wrong he improvises. When he’s in a tough spot he can come back. When he’s made mistakes be bounces back. The way he can suddenly turn it on and torch teams to take games away in as little as a quarter. And he’s still so young too. Honestly it’s so early in his career that I’m probably aboard the express hype train so fast but genuinely at least since I’ve watched the NFL I haven’t seen anything like it even compared to players like Brady, Manning or Rodgers at their best.