Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
Least surprising take ever.
IMO the second fact is far more relevant.So where was he supposed to get the money to pay them ...if not money earned from gainful employment.
That’s an absolute travesty of a decision.
As @RobinLFC rightly pointed out earlier, this is saying that they believe there’s merit to the accusations but they don’t consider them as severe as gambling on games you’re not connected to.
Gambling on games by players is an absolute no. It destroys the integrity of competition over time (Pete Rose, Black Sox, etc...) And even if the Supreme Court here has legalized sports gambling, every player knows what is at stake if you try it. It is of absolute relevance to the NFL to stamp it out.
Sexual assault by players? A more heinous crime, absolutely. However I think it's insane that there's this huge emphasis on the NFL "getting it right" (Bill Burr) with regards to matters that are appropriate for a court of law, and if Watson was imprisoned for rape or sexual assault then this wouldn't be a discussion. Why there's more angst directed at the NFL than the 2 grand juries that declined to indict him for criminal charges...
I'm alone with this probably but I think the NFL is too dumb to adjudicate matters as serious as sexual assault. Leave matters of criminal intent for institutions designed to handle such matters (with varying levels of competence, sometimes good, sometimes shit), and focus on the stuff that actually impacts the game.
Why there's more angst directed at the NFL than the 2 grand juries that declined to indict him for criminal charges...
feck you.This matter only came to a head when Deshaun Watson attempted to leave Houston
None of the women filed a criminal complaint around the time of the alleged incident
Two grand juries in two different counties when provided with all the statements surrounding the alleged incidents failed to find sufficient cause to indict Deshaun Watson
The NFL wants to make a public example of Watson but despite that, a former federal judge only banned him for 6 games
Watson has maintained his innocence throughout and could have quietly settled but he initially chose to fight and only chose to settle because he was going to lose another year of his prime playing the sport he loves.
I long for the day when we will return to treating allegations like allegations
100% agree on this take but context is everything. Ridley was away from the game at the time, they're just using him to set a deterrant example for the other players - which I get but is incredibly harsh on him, especially if you compare it to other supensions. They're basically saying "we don't care if you sexually assault, don't care if you use PEDs, don't care for domestic violence, as long as you don't bring the integrity of our own league into jeopardy". They don't care about anyting but their product.Gambling on games by players is an absolute no. It destroys the integrity of competition over time (Pete Rose, Black Sox, etc...) And even if the Supreme Court here has legalized sports gambling, every player knows what is at stake if you try it. It is of absolute relevance to the NFL to stamp it out.
Welcome to the best thread on the CafQuick Intro - Been a Rams fan since 1985 and the glory days of Eric Dickerson. We then left LA and went to St Louis, never was the same for me. Even though I went there to watch them play and beat the bears. Great to see the Rams back in LA but annoying to see the band wagon getting fuller by the second. Still the NFL is all about money.
Been all over the states watching the games - glad theres a UTD forum for the NFL.
I'm on board!!
Watson - 6 games,! Browns must be pissing themselves laughing and that could get cut to fewer on appeal. If it was me though, take the suspension and move on. If they can get 3-3 with 11 games to go thats a good position in that division.
5 games for free tattoos, FFS
NCAA horseshit.Why banned for free tattoos?!
Quick Intro - Been a Rams fan since 1985 and the glory days of Eric Dickerson. We then left LA and went to St Louis, never was the same for me. Even though I went there to watch them play and beat the bears. Great to see the Rams back in LA but annoying to see the band wagon getting fuller by the second. Still the NFL is all about money.
Been all over the states watching the games - glad theres a UTD forum for the NFL.
I'm on board!!
Watson - 6 games,! Browns must be pissing themselves laughing and that could get cut to fewer on appeal. If it was me though, take the suspension and move on. If they can get 3-3 with 11 games to go thats a good position in that division.
Welcome to the best thread of all time!Quick Intro - Been a Rams fan since 1985 and the glory days of Eric Dickerson. We then left LA and went to St Louis, never was the same for me. Even though I went there to watch them play and beat the bears. Great to see the Rams back in LA but annoying to see the band wagon getting fuller by the second. Still the NFL is all about money.
Been all over the states watching the games - glad theres a UTD forum for the NFL.
I'm on board!!
Watson - 6 games,! Browns must be pissing themselves laughing and that could get cut to fewer on appeal. If it was me though, take the suspension and move on. If they can get 3-3 with 11 games to go thats a good position in that division.
Fully expecting Kevin Bacon to be named next.I don’t even care that it’s him, what’s with all these people being brought into the ownership group? What’s the point? What the hell does he know about football?
Think he has a place in Colorado, dunno if he knows much about the NFL but he's not going to be involved in any actual decisions, it's probably a 1% stake. It's an investment for him and a way for your new owners to quickly get back a bit of the money they spent while retaining control and attracting some media attention by getting a famous sportsman to buy in.I don’t even care that it’s him, what’s with all these people being brought into the ownership group? What’s the point? What the hell does he know about football?
He has a home in Aspen but so do lots of rich people.Think he has a place in Colorado, dunno if he knows much about the NFL but he's not going to be involved in any actual decisions, it's probably a 1% stake. It's an investment for him and a way for your new owners to quickly get back a bit of the money they spent while retaining control and attracting some media attention by getting a famous sportsman to buy in.
Unless Wilson says he doesn't like Bottas' arse in which case Hamilton will seize control and cut him immediately. And rightly so.
Fins will be fun to watch this year.
that is a hell of a throw to be fair. Be really interesting to see if Tua does finally take the leap
Looked up whether he had anymore ties other than living in Colorado and apparently he was at Superbowl 50 and described the Broncos as his team.He has a home in Aspen but so do lots of rich people.
I dunno, I just don’t like it, and like I say it’s not just because it’s him.
Looked up whether he had anymore ties other than living in Colorado and apparently he was at Superbowl 50 and described the Broncos as his team.
It's not the Broncos doing something new either. Rodgers has a share in the Milwaukee Bucks, Mahomes has a stake in the Kansas City Royals, Wilson owns the 49ers and has a minority share in the Seattle Sounders. And if you offered me some new ownership of United but with Tom Brady buying a 1% stake, I'd bite your fecking hand off.
I wouldn't read much in to this, anybody in the NFL can make a 60 yard throw when you have the time to plant both feet and launch three-steps forward into it.
Tua has never demonstrated the arm strength to make these types of throws in real game situations when he's under pressure and off-platform or on the run.
Would be great to see him take a leap forward and put himself in the tier 2 QB conversation, but my guess is Tyreek will have to get used to catching quick balls underneath like Waddle did last year.
Looked up whether he had anymore ties other than living in Colorado and apparently he was at Superbowl 50 and described the Broncos as his team.
It's not the Broncos doing something new either. Rodgers has a share in the Milwaukee Bucks, Mahomes has a stake in the Kansas City Royals, Wilson owns the 49ers and has a minority share in the Seattle Sounders. And if you offered me some new ownership of United but with Tom Brady buying a 1% stake, I'd bite your fecking hand off.
It will be a struggle with Mariota at the helm.My Falcons look to be a doormat this year.
Forgot to tag the resident Broncoiteshttps://www.nfl.com/_amp/broncos-wr-tim-patrick-suffers-injury-training-camp
Not clear our serious yet.
Cheers dude, saw it earlier and dreading the confirmation but these things never end well.
Laughed out loud reading thatLooked up whether he had anymore ties other than living in Colorado and apparently he was at Superbowl 50 and described the Broncos as his team.
It's not the Broncos doing something new either. Rodgers has a share in the Milwaukee Bucks, Mahomes has a stake in the Kansas City Royals, Wilson owns the 49ers and has a minority share in the Seattle Sounders. And if you offered me some new ownership of United but with Tom Brady buying a 1% stake, I'd bite your fecking hand off.