Charlie Foley
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,346
That’s short. great play though
I was delighted with that as a first game. It was really satisfying to not fall into the same traps again and again and to have drawn up specific plays to beat an defensive scheme rather than just doing the same thing over and over. Did all the basic things right as well, like getting to the line of scrimmage on time which shouldn't be an accomplishment but absolutely is for us. Enjoyed seeing the different dimensions Eskridge and Everett brought to us, hopefully the former recovers quickly. And if Josh Gordon gets reinstated, can see us picking him up once more for the few weeks before he gets suspended again, would be cool to see him with Waldron.@Hephaestus what did you make of Waldron's first game as Seahawks OC?
I thought it was refreshing to see an actual game plan, variety and us making the most of our strengths. Felt so refrrshing to have a modern playcaller with a clue.
Edit - after tonight I wish we could do the same at United..
https://www.nfl.com/news/cowboys-de...fers-broken-foot-in-practice-out-indefinitely
Not good for the Cowboys at all.
I was poking around the Panthers forum and it genuinely reads like the Bluemoon with some of the nicknames - the aints, taints, shite stains etc.
There are accusing anyone who dares to predict a Saints win this weekend of being an undercover Saints fan.
That was brilliant.Line judge just got taken out.
Always funny being surrounded by Panthers fans who try to taunt you (me) for being a Broncos fan…. As it Cam Newton doesn’t deserve a place in our ring of fame.I was poking around the Panthers forum and it genuinely reads like the Bluemoon with some of the nicknames - the aints, taints, shite stains etc.
There are accusing anyone who dares to predict a Saints win this weekend of being an undercover Saints fan.
IndeedWhy are the Giants?
They both played out of conference games. I’m going with the whole thing was sorted in reverse alphabetical order because they didn’t know either.Apparently, in-conference games are rated higher.
Raiders beat AFC northWe’re one game in so it doesn’t mean anything at this stage but I’m curious as to how the divisional standings are determined where all teams won their opener.
The AFC West currently looks like this:
So if the tiebreaker is points scored why are the Chargers ahead of the Broncos, and if it’s point differential (which I would have expected) Denver would be top.
As I say I’m not moaning cos it’s Denver, it means nothing at this stage, I just found it odd when I noticed it.
They both played out of conference games. I’m going with the whole thing was sorted in reverse alphabetical order because they didn’t know either.
Raiders beat AFC north
Chiefs beat AFC North
Chargers beat NFC East
Broncos beat NFC East
First thing in this case is divisional record and then conference record. So Raiders and Chiefs have the first two spots because they won within the conference
I can’t understand why Broncos are 4th because the next tie breaker is strength of victory
Edit: Maybe strength of victory doesn’t mean point difference but the strength of the opponent. So chargers beating a playoff team is probably rated higher than Broncos beating non playoff team