- Joined
- Dec 27, 2022
- Messages
- 68
- Supports
- Newcastle
Yeah……….he only scored twice on Sunday, we should sell him,Although since I posted that both him and Haaland have not looked particularly good.
Yeah……….he only scored twice on Sunday, we should sell him,Although since I posted that both him and Haaland have not looked particularly good.
Much more of a poacher's instinct about him than I thought - it just shows the importance of putting balls into the box, he didn't really have to work hard for either goal, just have a good touch and stay calm.I've been suprised by him this year. Starting this season pretty good.
He isn’t just a poacher….have a look at the goal he scored at Everton last season, superb skills. Don’t forget he was injured until the second half of last season so this is his first full season. Definitely a 20+ goals a season striker.Much more of a poacher's instinct about him than I thought - it just shows the importance of putting balls into the box, he didn't really have to work hard for either goal, just have a good touch and stay calm.
Yes I know, I said he's much more of a poacher than I thought he was. That part of his game has surprised me.He isn’t just a poacher….have a look at the goal he scored at Everton last season, superb skills. Don’t forget he was injured until the second half of last season so this is his first full season. Definitely a 20+ goals a season striker.
They’ve bought well if we’re honest. Isak is a player I thought they took a bit of a chance on to be honest, and the fee seemed very high. I wasn’t sold on him. But he’s been very good this season. So credit where it’s due. Tonali isn’t a player I particularly looked at United signing, and I don’t have any real regrets about missing out on him. But Botman and particularly Bruno G, are two players who could’ve been signed at very reasonable fees, at great ages, who would’ve been a perfect fit for us. It’s those sorts of signings we’ve been really bad at.
The first one that fits that sort of profile for me, is Hojlund. Yes he cost quite a bit, but Isak sort of money, but the potential is huge, and he’s clearly ready to play for a big club.
If we are going to put a team together that’s going to challenge for titles, we should be signing a mix of up and coming players, who are high potentials punts; then crucially and most importantly, players who are through their early development, and on the cusp on going to the next level to become stars, but they aren’t bona-fide world beaters yet. Players in that 22-24 sort of age bracket. I’d have taken all of Bruno G, Szoboszlai, Timber, Mac Allister, and possibly Rice, and I think we’d have a much better squad that’s ready for now and the long term.
Im okay with the Mount signing because I think he’s close to filling that bracket; he just hasn’t found his groove yet. The Varane’s and Casemiro’s of this world are great in the short term but we’re getting them when their peak achievements and best years are behind them and that doesn’t make sense to me. You can’t build anything sustainable with that sort of transfer strategy. We paid 60m plus for Casemiro, at 30 years old. It works if he was 20m but not 60.
It’s just indicative of a lack of strategic thinking.
They’ve bought well if we’re honest. Isak is a player I thought they took a bit of a chance on to be honest, and the fee seemed very high. I wasn’t sold on him. But he’s been very good this season. So credit where it’s due. Tonali isn’t a player I particularly looked at United signing, and I don’t have any real regrets about missing out on him. But Botman and particularly Bruno G, are two players who could’ve been signed at very reasonable fees, at great ages, who would’ve been a perfect fit for us. It’s those sorts of signings we’ve been really bad at.
The first one that fits that sort of profile for me, is Hojlund. Yes he cost quite a bit, but Isak sort of money, but the potential is huge, and he’s clearly ready to play for a big club.
If we are going to put a team together that’s going to challenge for titles, we should be signing a mix of up and coming players, who are high potentials punts; then crucially and most importantly, players who are through their early development, and on the cusp on going to the next level to become stars, but they aren’t bona-fide world beaters yet. Players in that 22-24 sort of age bracket. I’d have taken all of Bruno G, Szoboszlai, Timber, Mac Allister, and possibly Rice, and I think we’d have a much better squad that’s ready for now and the long term.
Im okay with the Mount signing because I think he’s close to filling that bracket; he just hasn’t found his groove yet. The Varane’s and Casemiro’s of this world are great in the short term but we’re getting them when their peak achievements and best years are behind them and that doesn’t make sense to me. You can’t build anything sustainable with that sort of transfer strategy. We paid 60m plus for Casemiro, at 30 years old. It works if he was 20m but not 60.
It’s just indicative of a lack of strategic thinking.
United's recruitment under Ten Hag has been a disgrace and the manager is included for criticism in this assessment, not enough signings to move the needle of the first team quality. I'd take the window the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle have had especially when it comes to recruitment of the midfield. It's not that United have even signed bad players on paper but ones that don't take the team to the next level.
@golden_blunderHe's great but being Swedish it wasn't a huge surprise. I can't think of many who've failed to impress in the PL
Edit - Maybe Isakson for City.
This is such a fickle take. Last season literally every signing did well. This season everyone’s been poor and many players are injured.United's recruitment under Ten Hag has been a disgrace and the manager is included for criticism in this assessment, not enough signings to move the needle of the first team quality. I'd take the window the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle have had especially when it comes to recruitment of the midfield. It's not that United have even signed bad players on paper but ones that don't take the team to the next level.
How exactly is it a disgrace ? Martinez, Antony, Malacia, Mount, Hojlund, Onana, Casemiro and Amrabat. All of them were better than what we had /we have. We just haven't been able to find some form with the new team.United's recruitment under Ten Hag has been a disgrace and the manager is included for criticism in this assessment, not enough signings to move the needle of the first team quality. I'd take the window the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle have had especially when it comes to recruitment of the midfield. It's not that United have even signed bad players on paper but ones that don't take the team to the next level.
Kallstrom was pretty shit.He's great but being Swedish it wasn't a huge surprise. I can't think of many who've failed to impress in the PL
Edit - Maybe Isakson for City.
Kallstrom was pretty shit.
Elmander at Bolton was maybe the biggest flop. Signed him for about 8m (when that was a very big fee in the 2000s) and his scoring record was mediocre.
Defenders are always great, Mellberg one of my all time favourite Villa players.
I had a real soft spot for that era of Villa. Mellberg, Hitzlesperger, Angel, Vassell, Hendrie. Used to buy a lot of them for United on games!Elmander at Bolton was maybe the biggest flop. Signed him for about 8m (when that was a very big fee in the 2000s) and his scoring record was mediocre.
Defenders are always great, Mellberg one of my all time favourite Villa players.
You’re on a United forum, careful nowElmander at Bolton was maybe the biggest flop. Signed him for about 8m (when that was a very big fee in the 2000s) and his scoring record was mediocre.
Defenders are always great, Mellberg one of my all time favourite Villa players.
Elmander, Jonas Olsson, Martin Olsson, Seb Larsson, Toivonen, etc. Not really an impressive list.He's great but being Swedish it wasn't a huge surprise he'd take the league by storm. I can't think of many who've failed to impress in the PL
Edit - Maybe Isakson for City.
That is a very 2nd tier list to Ljungberg, Mellberg, Blomqvist, Larsson, Ibra…all left a big mark on the PL.Elmander, Jonas Olsson, Martin Olsson, Seb Larsson, Toivonen, etc. Not really an impressive list.
How exactly is it a disgrace ? Martinez, Antony, Malacia, Mount, Hojlund, Onana, Casemiro and Amrabat. All of them were better than what we had /we have. We just haven't been able to find some form with the new team.
Stop moaning for the sake of it.
How has our recrtuiment been a disgrace and Newcastle's so good but we still managed to finish ahead of them in the league and beat them in a cup final? I think sometimes people forget that we're measuring players at other clubs by completely different standards. Arsenal's so called amazing signings were not the work of some genius recretuiment either. The likes of Jesus, Zinchenko and Partey were seen as budget signings as they weren't even particularly young. Arsenal were just considered the type of club that can't make the really big moves and only able to sign players who weren't good enough for the elite. Their success is a good reflection on Arteta and the job he's done to build a coherent team, not that these players individually elevated them to the next level. If they could, they'd have done it before Arsenal or at least would have commended much bigger fees.United's recruitment under Ten Hag has been a disgrace and the manager is included for criticism in this assessment, not enough signings to move the needle of the first team quality. I'd take the window the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle have had especially when it comes to recruitment of the midfield. It's not that United have even signed bad players on paper but ones that don't take the team to the next level.
Carew's Norwegian, though.Carew though
Bigger than me or you
I mean it really hasn't.United's recruitment under Ten Hag has been a disgrace and the manager is included for criticism in this assessment, not enough signings to move the needle of the first team quality. I'd take the window the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle have had especially when it comes to recruitment of the midfield. It's not that United have even signed bad players on paper but ones that don't take the team to the next level.
I mean it really hasn't.
It's a massively biased and short-termist way of looking at things, and even like that, there's nothing "disgraceful" about it.There haven't been many hits, some very confusing ones (Mount)* and the lingering stench of 'we only sign players then manager knows' doesn't help.
*of course Mount and the others we signed this summer deserve a bit of time in a settled, injury free squad to show what they can do.
For £400m or whatever the figure is, it's not great is it?
I loved Larsson's cameo here as much as every other United fan that was there for it, but it's a stretch to say he left a big mark on the PL. Would the average oppo fan even remember or know he spent time here?That is a very 2nd tier list to Ljungberg, Mellberg, Blomqvist, Larsson, Ibra…all left a big mark on the PL.
It is a little bit but he was a great player for a few weeks for a team that won the league. Big impact relative to other Swedes who didn’t get near a title.I loved Larsson's cameo here as much as every other United fan that was there for it, but it's a stretch to say he left a big mark on the PL. Would the average oppo fan even remember or know he spent time here?
Carew's Norwegian, though.
How has our recrtuiment been a disgrace and Newcastle's so good but we still managed to finish ahead of them in the league and beat them in a cup final? I think sometimes people forget that we're measuring players at other clubs by completely different standards. Arsenal's so called amazing signings were not the work of some genius recretuiment either. The likes of Jesus, Zinchenko and Partey were seen as budget signings as they weren't even particularly young. Arsenal were just considered the type of club that can't make the really big moves and only able to sign players who weren't good enough for the elite. Their success is a good reflection on Arteta and the job he's done to build a coherent team, not that these players individually elevated them to the next level. If they could, they'd have done it before Arsenal or at least would have commended much bigger fees.
The point still stands that recruitment had different purposes for both clubs. Theirs was tasked to elevating them from mediocrity to second tier in the PL. Ours is expected competition for one of the best sides in PL history. It's like comparing the job David Moyes did for Everton and what he did for us. Two completely different standards, one can succeed one and fail miserably in the other because the latter is significanly more difficult and rarer to find.I think sometimes people forget where Newcastle were two years ago. Man United had a team worth a billion, NUFC were going to get relegated with a horrible squad that was lead by Steve Bruce.
And now NUFC is better + Moyes never got Everton to the CLThe point still stands that recruitment had different purposes for both clubs. Theirs was tasked to elevating them from mediocrity to second tier in the PL. Ours is expected competition for one of the best sides in PL history. It's like comparing the job David Moyes did for Everton and what he did for us. Two completely different standards, one can succeed one and fail miserably in the other because the latter is significanly more difficult and rarer to find.
The point still stands that recruitment had different purposes for both clubs. Theirs was tasked to elevating them from mediocrity to second tier in the PL. Ours is expected competition for one of the best sides in PL history. It's like comparing the job David Moyes did for Everton and what he did for us. Two completely different standards, one can succeed one and fail miserably in the other because the latter is significanly more difficult and rarer to find.
Why would he come to us? They will be ahead of us again this season.We should be after him.