Television Netflix is getting stupid password sharing guidelines

IPTV is better anyway. I remember during lockdown watching Rocky 1,2 and 3 on Netflix then 4 was on Prime ( I think) and 5 onwards were on pay as you watch platforms.
 
When this comes into effect in Ireland I'll cancel and just sail the seven seas if netflix have content I desire post cancellation.

:)
 
Netflix has gone to shit the past few years. The content is poor except for a few bits far and few between. Others have taken the model and run away with it with much better content and I'm not gonna miss Netflix at all. Hilariously stupid idea to claw back profits but it'll go back to norm within 6 months.

Hopefully other streaming services don't follow suit.
 
What about people with 2 houses? Tonnes over here have a Summer house, what the feck classes as “home wifi”?
I’ll make my phone home wifi in that case, as will everyone with half a brain, the stupid cnuts.

I haven’t got Netflix, but when I first heard the news this was my first thought. Connect to your phone once a month and you’re sorted
 
The other thread is over a year old so...

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...delines-for-cracking-down-on-password-sharing

Basically their plan is that you'll need to connect to your home WiFi on the viewing device at least once every 31 days otherwise they'll block your account. So if you don't use home WiFi for your device in the first place, or you're away for work for more than a month, you're fecked.

It's especially dumb because someone like me hasn't even used their Netflix account in a month because there's feck all I want to see, yet I'm still paying for it. This plan would mean they would be losing out on money from forgetful morons like me who haven't cancelled their subscription.
Just open it up every few days ...start something for ten seconds or so. Bob's your uncle.
 
What about people with 2 houses? Tonnes over here have a Summer house, what the feck classes as “home wifi”?
I’ll make my phone home wifi in that case, as will everyone with half a brain, the stupid cnuts.

Won't someone think of the people with multiple homes!!!
 
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.
 
Because it has an affect on the thing I'm being charged for? What a daft question.

And you find it hard to log in once a month?

I can understand people who use it on different TVs/houses and are sharing their accounts with others, but you literally said your biggest concern is that you will forgot to log in once a month, which seems like a real first world problem.
 
I could even see some clever company offering to bundle home wifi and perhaps even mobile phone plans with the subscription services, wouldn't that be wild.
Already being offered similar here in India
 
I'd expect it'll work like Now did, before Brexit. I had to get someone in the UK to log in once a month for it to continue to work in the EU without a VPN. Since Brexit, I just use the VPN and accept occasional buffering.

As others have said, having to buy the top Netflix package to get 4K and Atmos is a pisstake, and I share my account with three other family members. If I can't just log in occasionally to keep it active, they can whistle. There's very little on it anyway - the last time I logged on was to watch Glass Onion over a month ago.
 
So is there a plan to actually pay for others to use it or are they getting rid sharing entirely. I already pay €20 a month for Netflix.
 
We're back to the point where it's now cheaper to just have a SKY subscription than it is to subscribe to streaming services you want. Full circle.
 
We're back to the point where it's now cheaper to just have a SKY subscription than it is to subscribe to streaming services you want. Full circle.
We were always going to end back here, it's the way of capitalism. Money men can't help themselves.

Pirating has always been the way... to report things and keep honest companies like Netflix afloat. £20 a month is a small price to pay for a better world.

I've been reporting TLOU links for 3 weeks now, they've been posting high def versions when HBO MAX can show them for a small fee. The world is a cruel place.
 
So you can't even watch your own Netflix account on a hotel TV anymore? How do you connect that device to your home wi-fi to stop getting blocked?

And how is it determining what my home wi-fi is, compared to my mobile data?

Seems like this will punish more than password-sharers, but anyone who uses Netflix outside of their own house.
that’s what it seems like to me…. And for that reason I’m out.
 
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.

I think about this, but then sometimes I feel like the overlords of said smart people, who are only focused on the income of the here and now, overrule the people saying that this isn't a good idea and demand doing the thing that they think will make more money now.
 
What happens if you want to watch Netflix on your phone while you're on the treadmill at the gym? Or on a train or something? Feck that guy I guess.
 
Netflix talk about revenue and cutting costs, they should consider not paying for some of the absolute tripe shows and movies they've put on their platform the last few years.
 
I'll be surprised if Netflix doesn't end up much much smaller

They have
1. Few strong IPs remaining
2. Constant cancellations so they aren't building many strong IPs
3. Rising costs
4. Heavy competition
5. Draconian measures like the one discussed here
 
Haven't used Netflix in ages. We switched to Disney plus and are enjoying their collection far more.
 
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke
 
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke
The problem is they are asking people to pay up when they have a worse library.
 
The Netflix made content is shite. It’s usually a Ryan Reynolds movie where he’s phoning it in.

The series don’t fare much better. Better Call Saul is done. Stranger Things will be done this year / next year. Ozark is done (I think). What other shows will pull people in? They’re scraping the barrel with their content.

The other thing is - 90% of the non-Netflix content on their service can be found on Prime anyway.
 
The Netflix made content is shite. It’s usually a Ryan Reynolds movie where he’s phoning it in.

The series don’t fare much better. Better Call Saul is done. Stranger Things will be done this year / next year. Ozark is done (I think). What other shows will pull people in? They’re scraping the barrel with their content.

The other thing is - 90% of the non-Netflix content on their service can be found on Prime anyway.
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
 
There's a reason it's being trialled in Timbuktu. Presumably they will figure out a better method, like getting the people who connect from two different locations at the same time.
 
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
The only one I can see being a draw is Squid Game.
 
The problem is they are asking people to pay up when they have a worse library.

Of course but they know that. So instead of doing this way of saying own a whole account or feck off, they should have just charged extra households and caused less drama
 
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke

This is literally what they have been trialling (about 3USD a month), but I don't know if that's what they're going to use going forward, or how it affects those already with multi-device subs.
 
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.

And that's the flaw in your question.
 
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
Stranger Things?
 
There's a reason it's being trialled in Timbuktu. Presumably they will figure out a better method, like getting the people who connect from two different locations at the same time.

Yeah, that’s the most obvious/simple solution. Although still has flaws. I pay for Netflix for my household I don’t want to be stopped from watching it on my iPad on a business trip because my kids log on at home at the same time.

One thing I’m surprised they haven’t done is the Sky approach. Each account gets a fixed number of devices only.
 
So if my "home wifi" is my phone's hotspot, how would they know?