Brwned
Have you ever been in love before?
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 50,946
It’s always a good ouel Caf thing when a player hits form to pretend that he wasn’t utter shite previous to that. Matic has been appalling for a long time now, to pretend otherwise is willfully obtuse.
You're only saying that because you read everything through this prism:
We should never have signed him. Some on here weirdly got extremely defensive and tried to convince us all that he was this absolute colossus and anyone that didn't agree, was clueless etc. The fact is, he had been on a massive decline at Chelsea and despite his good start here, he's generally been extremely poor. I don't actually ever think he was close to being an elite level player, more that he had maybe 2 great seasons, if even that.
It's pure revisionism. The problem is, plenty went all out when we signed him - especially after the West Ham game - and slated anyone who didn't want him and we were all told we knew nothing about football, yada, yada. Funnily enough, the majority of these culprits are now nowhere to be seen, but the few that remain, will make out like he was brilliant last season, all to save face. Very petty really.
I got verbally abused on here by the holier-than-though crew when I had serious reservations about signing him. Apparently they all knew better than me, being true football fans and all that.
Anyone who wasn't absolutely trashing him when you were was judged as being part of this "holier than thou", "true football fan", "revisionist" Matic fanboy club. You took that position with me until I had to explain otherwise. Surely you can see that.
Like I said before, one possibility is that he was never good enough. I don't think his performances last season fit that narrative, and I think he's showing again that in the right conditions he can be very useful.
Another possibility is that he's past it, so like Scholes towards the end he can have a few good games but is mostly a liability. That's hard to tell but enough of a risk to justify bringing in another young player in his position.
The third possibility is that he is good enough and isn't past it, but Mourinho destroyed his confidence again. You completely ruled that out as a possibility because you were so sure you were right 6 months ago, 12 months ago and 18 months ago. Good for you man but if people don't agree with you, it isn't because they're biased, clueless or think they're "better" football fans. They just see different things than you see.
So when people are talking about this being the Matic we want to see, or this being the reason we bought him, or maybe even eventually this being a top midfielder...maybe consider they're not trying to revise history or save face? Maybe they just want to put the past behind them. Most people don't care thar much about whether they were "right" about Matic at various points. They just care about what they're seeing now and in the future.
If you need to attack people that have different opinions, that's fine, but just know that no-one cares about their opinion of Matic more than you. And if people seem less graceful in accepting your different views, it is because of the tone of the posts quoted above. It's so needlessly dismissive.