Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,997
Gary Neville - they are on the same level, but only took Valencia a handful of games to kick him out.
Ole needs to go. We get it.
I do think we will become a Harvard case study for failed succession planning at some point.Good point, get a fan in charge
We made such a good, prompt decision to sack Mou, then followed it up by somehow downgrading on him with a manager who failed at Cardiff. By that logic, Curbishley would genuinely have been a better option.
Only Man United can do this.
Chelsea last season has proven that "rebuilding" is nothing more than an excuse.I do think we will become a Harvard case study for failed succession planning at some point.
Beauty of football is you can fix things quickly and the entire ‘rebuild’ narrative is just something created to manage fans expectations - it all starts with the head coach and transmits to the pitch. If the club falls apart and we can’t sing players anymore, so be it, but as it stands the platform is there for a coach to come in and immediately challenge for all minor trophies and be close domestically and in the CL.
Yeah A guy that plays more adventurous football than ole and I'm not kidding, simeone played 352 against liverpool but actually used wingers in the wing back positions rather than fullbacks like that fraud ole and simeone has a winners mentality and made Atletico a force in Europe again and broke up the madrid/barca monopoly domestically, what a terrible fit..How can Simeone be a worse fit
That guy that faked his own death for the insurance by canoeing into rapids but was found in Brazil or Argentina or somewhere maybe him..
Well it’s not really that simple. We’ll probably be with the next manager for the next three years, so how about we don’t just appoint the first name that comes to mind.
Yep silly cnut.John Darwin
Steve Kean. The Blackburn Ole.
Exactly - a good coach will come in and you'll see changes in a couple of months, by year 2 you really should be seeing the blueprint in its entirety.Chelsea last season has proven that "rebuilding" is nothing more than an excuse.
Southgate is more risk averse and cowardly than Ole, but I don't think he's worse.From a realistic appointment I will say Southgate and as harsh as it may sound Rodgers
Don't worry, I will make a thread when Ole is sacked revealing the state of the caf when only a few minority like myself realized that we were not going anywhere with Ole in charge and the abuse these minority got on here.Wait, is the caf Ole out now?
Whilst winning somethingI actually agree I'd hate Simeone here. I'd probably prefer to ride it out with Ole for another months, it's not like the last 8 years have been anything but pain for a United fan, than get rid of him and be stuck with Simeone for the next 2-3 years, having 30% possession at home against Watford and Norwich. He's of course on a different planet quality wise but would still be a miserable appointment.
LVG with this squad would actually be pretty interesting to be fair - we wouldn't be losing 0-5 at OT to Pool, I can guarantee you thatMoyes, LVG, Giggs, Mourinho.
I want Ole gone asap but Ole has done a far better job than Moyes did here.Don't worry, I will make a thread when Ole is sacked revealing the state of the caf when only a few minority like myself realized that we were not going anywhere with Ole in charge and the abuse these minority got on here.
On the topic, there are of course many bad fit,, but from potential candidates, only one of mate fc will be a worse fit for united. Ole has vindicated Moyes.
LVG is a good coach, just keep him away from the transfer stuff. We needed an actual DOF when he was here.LVG with this squad would actually be pretty interesting to be fair - we wouldn't be losing 0-5 at OT to Pool, I can guarantee you that
Over Ole? Of course. How is that even debatable?You would want Mou back??
As pointed out to another poster, we’re talking about Mou now versus Mou when he came to us. He’s an absolute shipwreck of a manager now, lost at sea in a football world that has moved on without him. Not that he was great when he came here, but the name he had when he came here (and the idea he always wins trophies) has been dashed on the rocks (keeping with my shipwreck theme).Over Ole? Of course. How is that even debatable?
Pochetino.
Over OGS? Hell yes.
It is almost impressive that some fans seem to averse to lessons... How is the club benefitting from bringing back one of the factors that led to the downward spiral?Over Ole? Of course. How is that even debatable?
Weird choice of words. Only thing that is proven is that Chelsea didn't need a rebuild. Rebuilding is what made Ferguson so great, isn't one of the better ideas to diminish the concept.Chelsea last season has proven that "rebuilding" is nothing more than an excuse.
What Sir Alex did better than everyone was evolving the team, not consistently rebuilding from scratch.It is almost impressive that some fans seem to averse to lessons... How is the club benefitting from bringing back one of the factors that led to the downward spiral?
Weird choice of words. Only thing that is proven is that Chelsea didn't need a rebuild. Rebuilding is what made Ferguson so great, isn't one of the better ideas to diminish the concept.
Hmm... then it seems to be semantics. If you meant from scratch, I get it. Wouldn't be my definition though because a squad is always only built for a season max. Too many factors in the equation like form, injuries, competition, style of play yadda yadda yadda.What Sir Alex did better than everyone was evolving the team, not consistently rebuilding from scratch.
It would soon be if the club persists with Ole.Hmm... then it seems to be semantics. If you meant from scratch, I get it. Wouldn't be my definition though because a squad is always only built for a season max. Too many factors in the equation like form, injuries, competition, style of play yadda yadda yadda.
A rebuilt from scratch isn't needed today. Thank god. But it also doesn't only need one midfielder like Rice to conquer everything. (Don't want to imply that this is your stance on that matter, making more a general point).