Moussa Dembele

Offload Lukaku and bring in Dembele. No brainer.

More agile, more decisive in his finishing and decisions. Also keeps the ball moving towards goal instead of holding it up.

Front three of Dembele, Martial & Rashford..potential for years to come!

Dembele sounds so much better. :drool::drool:
 
Offload Lukaku and bring in Dembele. No brainer.

More agile, more decisive in his finishing and decisions. Also keeps the ball moving towards goal instead of holding it up.

Front three of Dembele, Martial & Rashford..potential for years to come!

Potential to finish 6th again.
 
Saw a compilation. Seems a useful player with better ability on the ball than Lukaku but there were so many under-hit/misplaced passes.
 
Not better than Lukaku. I imagine this is Ole just wanting someone who would happy to sit on the bench for his little Rashy.
 
To be fair, there's only just over 2 years in age difference between Rashford, Dembele and Martial. Dembele is only a year and a few months older than Rashford.

They're all 5 years away from their peak at least. It'd be cool to watch them grow together. That is assuming they actually develop of course.
 
Would be very disappointing if he is Lukaku's replacement as he would be a downgrade IMO. I am dreading the thought of relying on Dembele, Rashford and Martial to score goals for us next season, we would struggle to score 40 in the league.
 
Overall play will be better with him in the team, well any striker who can pass,control the ball, make decent runs, run with the ball etc but Goals might be harder to come as Mark Henry is a better finisher but then again he's been shit for us, 15 goals in 45 games for someone who is a good finisher.

Shocking when scoring is the best thing about him.
 
People who anger quickly at Lukaku's technical skills, might find Dembele... frustrating:

Unsuccessful touches/90 minutes:
Lukaku: 2.2 (League), 1.8 (CL)
Dembele: 3 (League), 4.3 (CL)

Those stats don't surprise me, Dembele is a poor man's Lukaku
 
Would be very disappointing if he is Lukaku's replacement as he would be a downgrade IMO. I am dreading the thought of relying on Dembele, Rashford and Martial to score goals for us next season, we would struggle to score 40 in the league.

I think Martial is a better finisher and player full stop than Rashford. Rashy trumps him on desire and effort of course but I believe Ole should try Martial centrally as I don't think he is a winger and honestly believe he can get 20 plus a season with coaching. Not sure on this Dembele lad but one thing I am sure of is Lukaku is an appalling footballer and unless playing with width and regular crossing we will never get the best out of him. Just not suited to us.
 
Lukaku might touch the ball a hell of a lot less than Dembele. Do we have average touches per game stats?

Per 90 is a better statistic than per game. Per game could be a 5 minute sub appearance or 60 minute start.
 
Per 90 is a better statistic than per game. Per game could be a 5 minute sub appearance or 60 minute start.

Of course but Lukaku can go huge amounts of time without touching the ball, some say he goes missing. I'm just curious as on average someone could feck up 4 out of 10 touches or someone can feck up 2 out of 4.

Don't know much about Dembele but watch Lukaku every game. Just need to know if a fair comparison.
 
At 22, I don't think that he is better than Lukaku but he is different and I think that he can be a lot more useful as a member of a unit. He isn't a player that you play for, he plays for the team.

I also think that he would score roughly the same amount of goals in the league, if you play him +2500 minutes.
 
This is video is amazing. I have never been so underwhelmed by a player on Youtube before. He barely scores in this video. :nervous::nervous::lol::lol:

Very fast but where have I seen that first touch before?


The first 10-15 clips are him scoring :lol:
 
FFS, thought this thread was about the former Spurs man. Would prefer this kid over Lukaku but not sure if he's going to solve our current issues upfront.
 
I'm all for this signing but seeing people posting front three's of Dembele, Martial and Rashford desn't really excite me at all. I think all 3 are strikers.

We could really do with some proper wide players to play on each side of our attack. I just hope Ole doesn't neglect adding some proper width into this team.
 
Potential to finish 6th again.

Ole likes to play counter attack football...I only see this as an improvement for the team and play Ole's style.

Maybe not title winning yet but at least we'll start winning more games and instill confidence and belief back in the team
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm all for this signing but seeing people posting front three's of Dembele, Martial and Rashford desn't really excite me at all. I think all 3 are strikers.

We could really do with some proper wide players to play on each side of our attack. I just hope Ole doesn't neglect adding some proper width into this team.

Get a right forward also and drop Rashford. That's what I would do anyway.
 
Despite having fewer minutes than all of them.

I think Dembele could turn out to be a decent player, he's very low risk. Either he's starter or bench player, he's good for us, we need more firepower in our depth.

There's not world class striker on market right now, I'd prefer to go for them when they're available rather than getting second to 10th choice.

The redcafe is weird, they demand top players, and say he's not enough good for bench players. Not many top players will join as bench players, they want to be the first choice. City, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid would have offered billion for Griezmann, Ronaldo, Neymar, Mbappe, Dybala, Aguero, Salah, Kane, etc together in the squad but not all of them will join unless they are guaranteed they'll be the first choice. If they were relegated to bench option, they'll hand in a transfers request instantly

Dembele is the only player who doesn't mind to be on the bench if it means he has to complete with Rashford for ST. I'd be happy with it

I’m not sure this is entirely accurate at all.

Given the position we are in should we not just be buying a World Class starter?

I’m not convinced Dembele is intended to be a bench player, but if he is then in excess of £40m is not very low risk.

We might be as well bringing in Daniel Sturridge for free, and sticking him on the bench if we’re looking for low risk backup.
 
I’m not sure this is entirely accurate at all.

Given the position we are in should we not just be buying a World Class starter?

I’m not convinced Dembele is intended to be a bench player, but if he is then in excess of £40m is not very low risk.

We might be as well bringing in Daniel Sturridge for free, and sticking him on the bench if we’re looking for low risk backup.

Entirely accurate? You're being polite, his logic is that we shouldn't buy a top striker because they might not like to sit on the bench. Feck me we're so far away from getting talent for the bench, our current options are the sub-par ones who should be sitting on the bench.
 
Greenwood will shock everyone. Dembele would be a solid addition. Sanchez and Lukaku out. Greenwood and Dembele in and the overall level rises imo. Age profile, energy and quality.
 
Entirely accurate? You're being polite, his logic is that we shouldn't buy a top striker because they might not like to sit on the bench. Feck me we're so far away from getting talent for the bench, our current options are the sub-par ones who should be sitting on the bench.

For me the issue is more to have the correct player in the market, ideally you build from the top, you bring a top player that pushes your current players on the bench but scarcity means that that player may not be available when you go into the market and in that case you need to find someone that will compete with your current options and eventually push them on the bench or forces them to up their game. Of course the second scenario means that you need to be careful with the fee and the age of the player that your bringing because in theory you are still looking for that top player and can't waste money on an obviously inferior option.
 
That Nicholas Pepe scored more than this guy. (22 goals/11 assists vs Dembele's 15 goals/4 assists)

Although Dembele played less (2014 minutes - Pepe played 3326 minutes)
 
That Nicholas Pepe scored more than this guy. (22 goals/11 assists vs Dembele's 15 goals/4 assists)

Although Dembele played less (2014 minutes - Pepe played 3326 minutes)

Going for Pepe makes a lot more sense. Which means we will go for Dembele.
 
That Nicholas Pepe scored more than this guy. (22 goals/11 assists vs Dembele's 15 goals/4 assists)

Although Dembele played less (2014 minutes - Pepe played 3326 minutes)

They are different and while Pépé is currently a better player, they don't play the same role and would both fill a need. Pépé is an inside forward that plays on the right while Dembélé is a traditional striker.
 
Don't have touches but Lukaku plays 20% more passes which would suggest he doesn't touch the ball a hell of a lot less and likely even touches it more.

Thanks. Not sure then but if he is worse than Lukaku at keeping the ball then it's a huge no for me.
 
Thanks. Not sure then but if he is worse than Lukaku at keeping the ball then it's a huge no for me.

These stats highly depends on context. Statistically in terms of unsuccessful touches, Lukaku is supposed to be better than Kane or Jovic.
 
For me the issue is more to have the correct player in the market, ideally you build from the top, you bring a top player that pushes your current players on the bench but scarcity means that that player may not be available when you go into the market and in that case you need to find someone that will compete with your current options and eventually push them on the bench or forces them to up their game. Of course the second scenario means that you need to be careful with the fee and the age of the player that your bringing because in theory you are still looking for that top player and can't waste money on an obviously inferior option.

That's exactly the situation we ended up with in our defence and I'd like to think we've learnt our lesson. If we're going to conduct our transfer business in such a way like an Everton level club that's exactly what we'll end up as.
 
That's exactly the situation we ended up with in our defence and I'd like to think we've learnt our lesson. If we're going to conduct our transfer business in such a way like an Everton level club that's exactly what we'll end up as.

All club do that and that's not what we did, relative to the market we were purchasing in we spent top money on the likes of Shaw, Lindelof and Bailly. Our mistake was to spend too much on these players and then not going after the top players when they were available. Bailly and Lindelof in 2016/2017 should have been purchased for the fee that Leicester spent on Maguire while we spent the type of fees that Barcelona spent on Umtiti or Bayern on Hummels/Sule.

Our issues are with matching players and fees, we are all over the place and take strange risks.
 
Finishing 6th with comedy Lukaku step overs, control and pointing or just finishing 6th....Actually, don't want him at least we get a laugh currently.

Except we finished 2nd when he was our number 9.
 
Except we finished 2nd when he was our number 9.
He was a good player for us before he decided to turn into Mark Henry. He had a terrific start to his first season here. He scored 8 games in a row or something. He has always had a bad touch but that didn't stop him from getting goals. If he really works on his fitness, he could still be a starter for us.
 
Those stats don't surprise me, Dembele is a poor man's Lukaku

Dembele is Far better technically, he’s also a lot more mobile. Big game player, Young, hungry. Hardworking. Needs to score goals more consistently, but he’s got everything you want in a Striker IMO

Can’t see why people would be against it
 
Dembele is Far better technically, he’s also a lot more mobile. Big game player, Young, hungry. Hardworking.

Can’t see why people would be against it

Lukaku is better that's why.