Desert Eagle
Punjabi Dude
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 18,373
De Bruyne sometimes plays deeper and is more of a dictator. I know Pep experiments a lot and often pushes him further forward, sometimes alongside the CF, but I'm talking in terms of ability to both pass and carry the ball, intelligence etc. That's the level of player we need in midfield if we want to compete. We lack brains and ability of the highest level, and until we sort that out we won't ever bridge that gap in my opinion. Not whilst De Bruyne, Pep etc are at City.
I’m saying for all the years Chelsea had Kante it made no difference to Man City, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Barcelona. There teams had players more than capable.
Asking me if there is another CR7 or Messi is a different question.
To pull it back to Caicedo whether we get him or not the difference won’t be as big as getting an elite football player which is why I don’t understand the issue with asking is he suited to what ETH is currently looking for.
We are quick to moan about square pegs in round holes. I’m asking the question.
Of course it made a difference. Chelsea beat those teams to big trophies in matches where Kante was a key contributor.
Back to Caicedo, i believe you are making the same point as pocco which is a fair one concerning the specific attributes we would ideally want in a midfield buy. While Caicedo is intelligent and a good passer and carrier of the ball, I think it's fair to say he's not at the highest level at those attributes.
My case for Caicedo is he is such a sure thing and at 21 years old at an age where he could prove to be incredible value especially when considering the opportunity cost of denying him to all our rivals who also have a hole in their midfield right now.