- Joined
- Mar 14, 2022
- Messages
- 1,156
Have a feeling he'll end up at Dortmund as Bellingham's replacement.
Totally different player, I think he’s cominvv go to unitedHave a feeling he'll end up at Dortmund as Bellingham's replacement.
Is he only no10 or he can play mc on Eriksen position? I doubt that we will soend 50-60 mil on Bruno's backupTotally different player, I think he’s cominvv go to united
Nah don't think so. Alfred Schreuder used him as a striker this season and while he did well there I feel he's wasted a bit there.Could Kudus play as a striker for us?
That's a shame. I don't see us as being in the running for him then.Nah don't think so. Alfred Schreuder used him as a striker this season and while he did well there I feel he's wasted a bit there.
Think he could replace BrunoThat's a shame. I don't see us as being in the running for him then.
Yeah quite possibly. Depends how big our budget will be I suppose because I assume that we will have bigger priorities.Think he could replace Bruno
He’ll cost £45m with efficient owners and he can play false 9, Right wing inverted, Number 10 and number 8 attacking midfielder his versatility is a huge benefitIs he only no10 or he can play mc on Eriksen position? I doubt that we will soend 50-60 mil on Bruno's backup
KUDUS IS NOT A STRIKER, what is this obsession with getting players for positions other than their own. Sure he has played there for a while but was complaining after every match that he wasn't a striker and doesn't like playing there.Could Kudus play as a striker for us?
Odegaard wanted to play for Arsenal. He publicly stated so. Ole has spoken highly of him in the past and I assume there have been contacts in the background.I don't really know a lot about him due to the amount of time he spent on the sidelines. But from the games I've watched, he's a player that will be in direct competition with Bruno if we sign him imo. Looks a player with a low centre of gravity, good dribbling ability and difficult to knock off the ball. Doesn't look like he has a expansive passing range, which may not be that important if the players in the defensive third (GK, CBs, deep mids, fullbacks) are of the requisite standard on the ball.
I think some of the mistakes the likes of Mourinho and Ole made when it came to recruitment was that they didn't take advantage of the players that they previously worked with or players that were from their native Portugal/Norway. Mourinho had the opportunity to sign Fabinho and it seems like he wasn't interested in some of the Portuguese talent that ended up at rival clubs. Solskjaer I feel should've tried for Odegaard. Klopp has signed numerous players who were either associated to the German or Austrian Bundesliga.
So I do hope we take advantage of signing good players that ten Hag has previously worked with. Whether that is Kudus or Timber, doesn't matter. What's important is signing players that the head scouts and ten Hag collaboratively agree on. And I'm sure we'll sign players that will be put forth by the likes of Mayorga/Wells with input from Dominic Jordan in a data analytics pov. The likes of Timber and Kudus would be more difficult to sign without ten Hag. So we should try taking advantage in such a situation, especially now that we will have had a full season of the newly installed recruitment/data science team running the rule over the aforementioned players.
Odegaard was reportedly a Liverpool fan, and we showed no interest in signing him from Madrid. The club that did show a interest was Arsenal and hence he ended up playing for them.Odegaard wanted to play for Arsenal. He publicly stated so. Ole has spoken highly of him in the past and I assume there have been contacts in the background.
On Mourinho, I think there was a massive clash between him and the scouting department, as evidenced by transfers which he seemingly hasn't initiated (Fred, for example). We did buy Dalot on his recommendation and I assume he requested other Portuguese or LigaNOS-based players but was denied either by scouts or by their price tags.
I don't really know a lot about him due to the amount of time he spent on the sidelines. But from the games I've watched, he's a player that will be in direct competition with Bruno if we sign him imo. Looks a player with a low centre of gravity, good dribbling ability and difficult to knock off the ball. Doesn't look like he has a expansive passing range, which may not be that important if the players in the defensive third (GK, CBs, deep mids, fullbacks) are of the requisite standard on the ball.
I think some of the mistakes the likes of Mourinho and Ole made when it came to recruitment was that they didn't take advantage of the players that they previously worked with or players that were from their native Portugal/Norway. Mourinho had the opportunity to sign Fabinho and it seems like he wasn't interested in some of the Portuguese talent that ended up at rival clubs. Solskjaer I feel should've tried for Odegaard. Klopp has signed numerous players who were either associated to the German or Austrian Bundesliga.
So I do hope we take advantage of signing good players that ten Hag has previously worked with. Whether that is Kudus or Timber, doesn't matter. What's important is signing players that the head scouts and ten Hag collaboratively agree on. And I'm sure we'll sign players that will be put forth by the likes of Mayorga/Wells with input from Dominic Jordan in a data analytics pov. The likes of Timber and Kudus would be more difficult to sign without ten Hag. So we should try taking advantage in such a situation, especially now that we will have had a full season of the newly installed recruitment/data science team running the rule over the aforementioned players.
If we choose to persevere with Bruno next season and don't sign this guy, anytime Bruno underperforms people who are muppetting in this thread can say: "Don't blame me, I voted for Kudus".Think he could replace Bruno
Definitely imo.A direct competition for Bruno makes sense considering how we have deployed Weghorst lately.
22/23 | Ill | Jan 7, 2023 | Jan 13, 2023 | 6 days | 2 |
21/22 | Fractured Rib | Nov 15, 2021 | Feb 6, 2022 | 83 days | 13 |
21/22 | Ankle Injury | Jul 16, 2021 | Sep 16, 2021 | 62 days | 6 |
20/21 | Fitness | Jan 14, 2021 | Feb 9, 2021 | 26 days | 6 |
20/21 | Meniscal Injury | Oct 22, 2020 | Jan 9, 2021 | 79 days | 15 |
20/21 | Knock | Oct 2, 2020 | Oct 9, 2020 | 7 days | 1 |
Definitely imo.
We need competition in the attacking midfield role and Kudus looks like a player who will provide competition in the role with a different set of attributes. I haven't seen him play a lot, but from the little I have, I can understand why a player with his skillset would appeal to us. And he also carries a goal threat.
Below are a few vids, which highlight what he could potentially add to our team.
Completely agree mate, spot on.Agree. I also think it suits Bruno being more of a «pure» attacker, the way he is when EtH plays him out wide. Gets more time and space on the ball, and more freedom to attack. Also ensure we see less of him on the ball in areas where we really dont want to lose it.
Personally, I also prefer someone more physical through the middle than him. With both him and Fred it feels very «weak».
Replaces Eriksen.
Bruno, for me.
Ahhh yes, let’s take this moment to shit on the clubAnother gem unearthed by our Scouting Department!
If we choose to persevere with Bruno next season and don't sign this guy, anytime Bruno underperforms people who are muppetting in this thread can say: "Don't blame me, I voted for Kudus".
This is the biggest thing that drives me absolutely crazy on this forum. People assuming players are equally as good in other positions - Buy Kudus as a striker, Buy Timber as a right back because he played there as a 14 year old, buy Gakpo as a striker, buy Gvardiol as a RCB. Just buy players in the effin' positions they've shone in.KUDUS IS NOT A STRIKER, what is this obsession with getting players for positions other than their own. Sure he has played there for a while but was complaining after every match that he wasn't a striker and doesn't like playing there.
Nah don't think so. Alfred Schreuder used him as a striker this season and while he did well there I feel he's wasted a bit there.
I think he's best as an attacking midfielder. His close control is amazing and he's very hard to dispossess. Only think still lacking a bit is decision making at times. Not sure how fast he is (relaying on the wing), should probably ask our resident Ajacieden. I'm sure @AjaxCunian or @BrilliantOrange have an idea.Do you think he could play on the right cutting in? That's such a weak spot in general due to the lack of left-footers that I could see him getting bought by a quality team like Napoli (Politano moving on).
Kinda feels like this is who Spurs should sign. He could play as a #10 if they move to 4 at the back, or give their midfield an actual pulse going forward if he's in a 3 when Kulusevski sits and backup Kulusevski since Kane wants to drop deep and Porro can create from out wide, so he could play somewhat tucked in and not be marooned out wide.
He is playing there last few matches, in a Ziyech kinda role. So he can roam and do what he wants, but starts on the right wing.Do you think he could play on the right cutting in? That's such a weak spot in general due to the lack of left-footers that I could see him getting bought by a quality team like Napoli (Politano moving on).
Kinda feels like this is who Spurs should sign. He could play as a #10 if they move to 4 at the back, or give their midfield an actual pulse going forward if he's in a 3 when Kulusevski sits and backup Kulusevski since Kane wants to drop deep and Porro can create from out wide, so he could play somewhat tucked in and not be marooned out wide.
He's fast, very fast for an attacking midfielder, very athletic. He might not be as fast as your typical winger but he's much stronger than they are and very difficult to get off the ball.I think he's best as an attacking midfielder. His close control is amazing and he's very hard to dispossess. Only think still lacking a bit is decision making at times. Not sure how fast he is (relaying on the wing), should probably ask our resident Ajacieden. I'm sure @AjaxCunian or @BrilliantOrange have an idea.
Crazy thinking!!This is the biggest thing that drives me absolutely crazy on this forum. People assuming players are equally as good in other positions - Buy Kudus as a striker, Buy Timber as a right back because he played there as a 14 year old, buy Gakpo as a striker, buy Gvardiol as a RCB. Just buy players in the effin' positions they've shone in.
I was going to post exactly the same. Whenever I’ve watched him he looks very similar to Amad. Low centre of gravity, fantastic first touch and quick incisive passing. I’d say we need to give Amad a shot before pursuing this one!Seems similar style to Amad but with greater upppr body strength
He's fast, very fast for an attacking midfielder, very athletic. He might not be as fast as your typical winger but he's much stronger than they are and very difficult to get off the ball.
Would be a good signing for both clubs.
His dribbling looks very good and on top of that, it also looks like his ball retention is also at a high level. He's also physically very strong with a good turn of pace and a defensive game to go along with that.His dribbling looks great
I like him a lot but in terms of ball retention, he isn't doing well at all.His dribbling looks very good and on top of that, it also looks like his ball retention is also at a high level. He's also physically very strong with a good turn of pace and a defensive game to go along with that.
He's got very good potential as a attacking midfielder who is showing the ability to drop into the middle third and advance the play via his dribbling skills through to the final third. We don't have anyone who can do that at a high enough level. And a player with Kudus' attributes has the potential to make us a more dominant team on the ball due to his natural gifts. And I think a player with his attributes can help the team improve collectively by aiding the development of a system of play, which will exert more control, create more chances and score more goals over the course of a season.
From what's being reported by several journos, it seems like ten Hag ideally wants at least 5 new players if money wasn't an issue. And those positions are GK, RB, CM, AM, Striker.
And I think that could be a reality if we get new owners in by May.
I'm going off the analysis below regarding his ball retention. And for a player that looks to evade/resist the press via ball carrying, dribbling, and playing forward passes. His ball retention is really good.I like him a lot but in terms of ball retention, he isn't doing well at all.
Surprisingly, he is also not very productive when it comes to end product.
Let's see. If we get him though, that's almost the end of Mejbri/Amad hopes for a place in the squad next season.
Edit: all screenshots are last 365 days compared to top 5 leagues.