Judas
Open to offers
Arambat moves like his pockets are full of change and he's afraid it will all fallout.
this is unbelievably accurate.
Arambat moves like his pockets are full of change and he's afraid it will all fallout.
This cannot be said enough. The man has lead in his feet. His passing is atrocious. Throw him on the last ten minutes when we need a goal.As many problems as Amrabat has, I would take him alongside Mainoo or Casemiro, instead of McT any day of the week. We cannot have a single-person defensive midfield with our current midfielders.
Playing with McT is like playing with 10 men. He may score a goal every once in a while, but he is non-existent the rest of 90 minutes. Use him as a super-sub at most, but that's the extent of his usefulness.
I appreciate McTominay, his athletic qualities and mindset. The problem I see with him (and probably what motivated his potential exit last summer) is the fact that he doesn't fully fit in any role in the current midfield. I see him as a good complementary player in a midfield three, next to a creative 8 who can orchestrate, and both backed by an actual anchor. He could do a bit of everything there while the team remains balanced.
Our problem as always is how we combine the pieces we have in the squad. If we take Bruno as a reference as a number 10, the two midfielders should be someone dictating the play from behind (EtH wanted De Jong) and a strong defensive presence next to him who can also manage the ball well when pressed.
From that point I don't see how we can fit McTominay into that setup when he's not solid enough as an anchor, he's not a deep playmaker nor a creative number 10.
Playing him in a midfield two and instructing him to bomb forward leaves the team too open defensive wise. Taking Bruno as a reference any combination of two out of Casemiro-Amrabat-Mainoo makes more sense than McTominay. Even under a new manager I think the story would be the same. I don't think it's about ten Hag but about combining the players we have.
It was the same with Fred. Next to Casemiro we're too stiff, there's no "football" (as EtH said once after subbing Casemiro). Next to Eriksen we're not solid enough. There's no good combination with these 'supportive' kind of midfielders. Both together (Scott and Fred) did a job under Ole but it was never going to be the formula going forward.
If I was Scott I'd be looking for a team where his qualities could be properly exploited. There's a good player there in the right setup but he'll remain "a square peg" here and never looking fully convincing in any role. As I said he doesn't disturb me in the squad, good emergency option to chase a late goal maybe and playing the occasional game. But it could be beneficial for both sides to explore new options next summer.
Yes, that would be my option as well. I'd want Mainoo to keep playing to see what he's capable of. He looks really sober and composed for his age.I think Mainoo could very well be that De Jong type midfielder who can break the press, play through the lines and also dictate whilst Casemiro is obviously a very strong defensive presence who can manage the ball BUT he struggles with the stamina side so basically a Casemiro type with legs (Palhinha, Kone, Tchouameni) alongside Mainoo.
McTominay turns us into a single pivot, but supposedly offers us more offensive threat.
Exactly. This is why Ten Hag gets no credit for playing them against Liverpool. He was literally forced to do it and today we see he still doesn't see this as an option.With ten Hag this season, it's always going to be one of Mainoo, Amrabat and Casemiro as the 6. One of McTominay, Eriksen and Mount as the 8/10 hybrid. Then Bruno as the 10.
The only time we'll play two of the 6s is when they're literally all we have available like against Liverpool. If Bruno hadn't have been suspended, Mainoo and Amrabat would not have played together there.
This is absolutely painful to think about.Scott isn’t a midfielder. Hes being played as a 10 and as long as he scores his one goal in 5 then he’s staying there and it’s baffling why. It’s as if someone told Ten Jag to get the best out of Scott and the rest will follow.
He’s literally done it in 2 games this season that’s all. It’s a total myth he’s a goal threat. He scored 1 goal in the Premiership last season.He's the only guy in the squad that seems to be able to score, but even with that I've no idea why he continues to start.
With ten Hag this season, it's always going to be one of Mainoo, Amrabat and Casemiro as the 6. One of McTominay, Eriksen and Mount as the 8/10 hybrid. Then Bruno as the 10.
The only time we'll play two of the 6s is when they're literally all we have available like against Liverpool. If Bruno hadn't have been suspended, Mainoo and Amrabat would not have played together there.
McTom 101 times out of 100.
Acrobat moves like anything but.
He’s literally done it in 2 games this season that’s all. It’s a total myth he’s a goal threat. He scored 1 goal in the Premiership last season.
How would having no mctominay vs west ham made a damned difference? It wasn't our midfield failing to control the game costing us. It was our wide players operating like football androids with freshly formatted memory stores that killed us all game. Even with Ambrabat we still lose two nil. {And NO this isn't "a defence of mctominay". Its bafflment at seeing anyone attempt to blame midfield selection for that defeat)Why was Amrabat left out today? Was solid v Liverpool. We looked much better with Mainoo and Amrabat together.
Bruno comes back in and Ten Hag doesn't have the balls to drop McTominay because he is top scorer.
Playing Bruno in his default position wouldn't hurt - for starters. McTominay is occupying second striker role now, effectively pushing Bruno around.How would having no mctominay vs west ham made a damned difference? It wasn't our midfield failing to control the game costing us. It was our wide players operating like football androids with freshly formatted memory stores that killed us all game. Even with Ambrabat we still lose two nil. {And NO this isn't "a defence of mctominay". Its bafflment at seeing anyone attempt to blame midfield selection for that defeat)