So you can't remember a single player failing a medical for a hamstring issue but you're absolutely sure the science is there to predict if a hamstring is sound or not.
Why does it never happen then? Why do they always miss players with these problems? Why are they not doing it at a young age and avoiding these players from the start.
Whether or not I, Rozay of Redcafe who works in property, can ‘remember’ the outcome of all football medicals is not the barometer for determining their effectiveness.
Who says it doesn’t though? What do you propose happens at a sports medical? They take a player’s temperature? You also don’t know where the bar is set. Every player sustains injuries. That is obviously not going to stop players from moving.
It's not just you, nobody can recall a medical being failed because it predicted future hamstring issues. Because it doesn't happen.
A common sense approach would be to employ inductive logic ie; this player has often had injury issues therefore they will likely continue to have injury issues.
Maybe if you actually remember what you posted it’ll help.
Maybe Mason Mount doesn’t have a ‘chronic hamstring problem’??? Are you a doctor?
In which case maybe you, I, or. 4 year old can do a medical. No actual science required.
Genuine question: would you like me to explain inductive reasoning to you?
I don’t require any explanations from you ar all. Your ‘inductive reason’ is fine for a builder on Redcafe to use to speculate injuries for United players, however, for highly qualified medical professionals, I expect science to form the basis of any projection.
The basis of all of science is inductive reasoning. As fans on a football forum, it's perfectly reasonable to employ said reasoning when discussing possible new recruits, particularly after a season where injuries have been a huge issue, without it being deemed "drama." And that goes doubly when many of the players we signed who start injured, end up injured again. Given that this is a clearly reasonable argument to make, and that you seem unreasonable dismissive of it, I suspect you might not be playing fair.
Wow he looks skilled, very technical.
All good points and I share your concerns.
He'll probably end up at Spurs, Arsenal or some Italian club where he will become a 80m player.
we need players like him imo, such a natural player.he was also really good against us in the CL
Not sure Stevenage could afford him
He might be lured by the magnificence of the lamer stadium or the natural wonder of the Fairlands valley or the bright lights of the old town, it’s not always down to money you know.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
From speaking to some Palace fans, the view appears to be his injuries were mismanagement under Roy. Seems to be OK again under Glasner
We’ll be selling Greenwood, Pellestri and one of Sancho or Antony so that will bring in more than Olise’s release clause. With how Sancho is performing it’s realistic we’d get £40 million for him, Greenwood I’d say £30 million then £10 million for Pellestri not to mention around £500K a week off the wage bill.
That's a pretty shit stack of players.
Garnacho, Rashford and Amad are the only ones worth considering. Room for one more.
Was likely sarcasm
Id sign them both if thats true. Kudos is more like Eze for me.
Ah yeah, didn't notice the single inverted commas.
Lets not count chickens, we may struggle to sell any of them. Dortmund arent going to pay forSancho, are the bigger clubs goingto take the risks with Greenwood, will we cut a huge loss onAntony and who would buy him for anykind of big fee and Pellstriprobably doesnt even bring in double figures....they could all be loans.
