mitchmouse
loves to hate United.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Messages
- 18,742
that's approximately £19.999m too much£20m approx.
that's approximately £19.999m too much£20m approx.
£20m approx.
You're never happy though so that's not a surprise.that's approximately £19.999m too much
We're obviously doing a buy one get one free deal, so noWont giving them more money make signing De Jong less likely?
Not to mention this guy is a bit pony.
Wont giving them more money make signing De Jong less likely?
Not to mention this guy is a bit pony.
YeahWe're obviously doing a buy one get one free deal, so no
Might be a bit of both to be honest… can’t say he hasn’t improved them though because Haller was banging them in the champions league.could it not be attributed to the league they went to? its the same with the Depay thing and Lukaku. Dudes leave the premier league and go to a "less taxing" league and show out then all of a sudden they are "dons". I dont see it like that
Would we not be better of playing martial up top and signing a right winger? We’re short on the right wing… up front we have rashford who can fill in with martial and Ronaldo if he stays… right wing we just have sancho who’s the only one comfortable playing there.Not gonna lie, he looks amazing in that video Haven't really seen him since his United days and it was evident that he wasn't cut out for the winger role but he might be good as a striker (remember him playing there for us once and was impressive).
Would we not be better of playing martial up top and signing a right winger? We’re short on the right wing… up front we have rashford who can fill in with martial and Ronaldo if he stays… right wing we just have sancho who’s the only one comfortable playing there.
Like I said though rashford can play up top if needs be… Depay is similar to rashford as he likes being on the left but can come into the middle. If sancho gets injured who do we play right wing? None of the young lads are up to it.We are one injury to Martial away (not the unlikeliest scenario) and we have no number 9 (if Ronaldo leaves). So Depay would make absolutely sense. For 20 mill it's a no brainer really.
Like I said though rashford can play up top if needs be… Depay is similar to rashford as he likes being on the left but can come into the middle. If sancho gets injured who do we play right wing? None of the young lads are up to it.
why? He is still playing in the EPL which Ten Haag as little experience in. I'd take him for 20m though20m for an established player in the current market is really good value. He just turned 28 as well. He has grown as a footballer and as a person.
Great international stats. Did fantastic in France, a bit meh in Barcelona, but Barcelona was already in turmoil when he arrived. He would do really well for Ten Hag.
Only improvement from him is that his beard now connects, same player otherwise.
that's approximately £19.999m too much
I don't see the point of this at all. He wasn't cut out for the premier league the first time round, and he's done nothing since then to suggest he's become the world beater we need. He wouldn't be an upgrade on Martial either.
De Bruyne not cut out? We barely saw him. Salah he had the pace to beat the trap but was a bit erratic with finishing. Funny enough both of them were under Jose, the great giver of youthSalah and De Bruyne weren't 'cut out' for the PL first time around either..
I'm not saying Depay is on their level, but to write him off completely is a bit silly I think. I think for around £20m, he'd be a very useful option and provide cover for when Ronaldo eventually leaves
we don't play international football. the fact people keep stating his "international stats" is concerningWon't find another 1 in 2 International striker that actually wants to join us, especially not for the price quoted. We're going to get injuries and need to rotate, and with 5 subs this season, someone like Depay would be a great option.
I think it's just speculation for us related to the FDJ saga but I saw Newcastle maybe interested.Are there any reliable sources saying we're in for him? Or are we just filling pages for fun?
I would be happy for us to sign Memphis, but only under the following conditions:Cody Gakpo instead please.
so you think he's good enough suddenly for us... you must think they've fallen further than I do. How very pessimistic of youMoan, moan, fecking moan..
so you think he's good enough suddenly for us... you must think they've fallen further than I do. How very pessimistic of you
wow... that's all I can say. I think you'll find it's that sort of purchasing that's put us where we are today. He wasn't even close to good enough when we got rid of him and I see no huge improvementI think for £20m he's a decent squad option, in a position where we're going to be very light, when Ronaldo leaves.
wow... that's all I can say. I think you'll find it's that sort of purchasing that's put us where we are today. He wasn't even close to good enough when we got rid of him and I see no huge improvement
It's widely used as a yardstick to reflect a player's ability, because its elite level competition. It's not rocket science. That's akin to saying we don't play football in Holland, so we should stop buying Eridivisie players.we don't play international football. the fact people keep stating his "international stats" is concerning
I've probably supported the club for longer than you've been alive but don't let facts get in the way of your nonsense. I just happen to call out things that we are no longer doing as well as other clubs which is why we are where we are. but again, clearly that doesn't worry you.He's moved to a more central position and transitioned into an (average 1 in 2/3 striker). That's not bad for a squad option and to say we'd be getting the same player back is clearly nonsense.
I don't think we'll get him anyway, I just find it tiring that you'll attack the club for anything and everything.