There's off topic, and then there's whatever the hell is going on in here.
No worries, I'm 'managing' it.There's off topic, and then there's whatever the hell is going on in here.
Weren't we both?Apologies to management.
Just joshing a bit.
Absolutely, you’re swell.Weren't we both?
Ha, I clearly still have some way to go in English! I have no idea about the connotations of that word.Absolutely, you’re swell.
Was seeing if you would call me patriarchal for using ‘joshing.’
Ageist as well.Ha, I clearly still have some way to go in English! I have no idea about the connotations of that word.
I do know 'swell' sounds like first half of the 20th century; not sure I've seen or heard it used after. Sorry if that dates you.
Urgh, Americans.Ageist as well.
Your bingo card is filling up!
Old-ish, but not that old.
It’s not like I uses ‘peachy keen!’
Could go in multiple threads...
About the only positive thing I’d say about Candace is I...I am part of a group of grad school friends on Facebook, several of whom are AA. They have some definite opinions in Candace Owens.
Dude’s losing his mind...
Good point.Loosing?
I think this is performative. He’s always been a closeted white supremacist, but now he doesn’t have to hide it. I think we are seeing the real, unrestrained, Tucker now.
My mother gave me his book to read as a kid. First nonfiction I ever read. She thought his family's story would inspire me. My mother now sees him as an idiot.To think this guy was once a world renowned brain surgeon is mind boggling.
@nimic - thoughts?
My bad, was unaware this could be verboten. If this is in violation, I will remove.@nimic - thoughts?
My bad, was unaware this could be verboten. If this is in violation, I will remove.
I hear you. So as not to continue the trend, I will amend my post.It's apparently not, I just don't personally like that every time a woman is brought up in the CE people have to add whether or not they would feck her. I used to report posts that I felt went too far, but I gave up a few months ago.
You at least made it part of a statement (i.e you don't like her).
It's apparently not, I just don't personally like that every time a woman is brought up in the CE people have to add whether or not they would feck her. I used to report posts that I felt went too far, but I gave up a few months ago.
You at least made it part of a statement (i.e you don't like her).
I hear you. So as not to continue the trend, I will amend my post.
My bad, was unaware this could be verboten. If this is in violation, I will remove.
I'm sure you can find summat else to be offended about.
She’s not aesthetically displeasing.No, you're good. Please carry on being human.
But, Candace Owens ?
No, you're good. Please carry on being human.
But, Candace Owens ?
Oh yeah, no problem.
Second that.I've never had that response before, but I definitely like it.
She’s not aesthetically displeasing.
Am I the obsessed one or are you? I haven't reported any since the last time you made a very funny remark about it.
The lack of reports have definitely been appreciated, so thanks for that.
The lack of reports have definitely been appreciated, so thanks for that.
No problem, but I'm sure Niall would look to remove the report function entirely if you asked really very nicely. It's just eating up bits or bytes or whatever, after all. If we're lucky, the moderation tools are next to go.
It’s not like it’s my views on the cartoon or Rashford, nothing worth really debating or defending, more of a backhanded compliment to someone who’s words many probably recall when trying to reduce an erection.I've never had that response before, but I definitely like it.