Would rather have him than AWB. Made a thread about him not that long ago:
http://www.redcafe.net/threads/max-aarons.447849/#post-24186340
I know that english football culture have a tendency to evaluate a fullback mainly on his ability to defend. And since a fullback is a defender I guess that makes sense. In some teams and systems it might be a good approach too.
If you play a defensive and reactive football you will probably be happy with your fullback if he is rock solid defending, but offers little going forward. But there is a problem with that in a more proactive and attacking team, the way I see it.
If a player offer little going forward, there is an inherent limitation to his potential overall contribution depending on the other team. The player will not do much more than help stop the other team through defending. If you can attack there is, in theory, no limitation to your potential contribution going forward.
The best teams in the PL limit the other teams through sheer domination of play. Take Liverpool as an example. Trent Alexander-Arnold is not a very good defender and certainly not at AWBs level in my opinion. I doubt that AWB would struggle against Rashford the way TAA has. Regardless, Liverpool still only conceeded 22 goals this year.
Would Liverpool conceed much less with a better player than TAA? Probably not. Despite his limitations defending, its good enough most of the time. And the other teams are, knowing the attacking threat TAA represent, careful when attacking. Being a better defender would have a very limited value to TAA.
Attacking wise, on the other side, there does not appear to be a limitation to his contribution currently. He has offered more assists and key passes than most attacking midfielders (and a lot of attackers), including our very own Paul Pogba. And unfortunatly, I think there is a lot more to come from him!
That is why I would be very careful paying a lot of money for a fullback who has only proven that he is great at defending. If we develop our team the way we should, being a great defender will be of limited value compared to being a great attacker. Being good on the ball will be of huge importance and value. Both to create a team that can dominate with the ball and to the attacking contribution he will provide against some of the defensive, reactive low-block type of teams we face.
I can not say for sure that AWB does not have more to his game than what he has shown at Crystal Palace. He probably has. But I would be very surprised if he had the same passing ability (linkup, through balls, crosses) and flair as players like Robertson and Trent-Arnold. If he do, he would be one of Palace best weapon going forward and I’m sure Hodgson would try to make use of that to a bigger degree than what he has.
Max Aarons do not have the same crossing ability as Trent-Arnold. But on other areas, he is even better going forward. His ball control and low gravity almost makes him reminicent of David Silva or Bernardo Silva. He also have, like Trent-Arnold and Robertson, the ability to quickly spot an attacking opportunity going forward.
In short, I feel much more confident in Aarons ability as an attacking fullback. AWB might have potential, but has yet to prove it.