You're welcome.What happened with this place? Few months ago rumours about James, Longstaff, Aarons...would cause total meltdown here( and with that dozens of good jokes). Now people react positively on every Championship player.
You're welcome.What happened with this place? Few months ago rumours about James, Longstaff, Aarons...would cause total meltdown here( and with that dozens of good jokes). Now people react positively on every Championship player.
Plus Dalot too, and we'd still have Ashley Young to provide experience and play ahead of them until they are ready. nahCan we get both? AWB to defend, MA to attack, and we have right side soreted. Or not.
What happened with this place? Few months ago rumours about James, Longstaff, Aarons...would cause total meltdown here( and with that dozens of good jokes). Now people react positively on every Championship player.
Yes sorry, forgot to mention Dalot. Rest of your sentence I deleted from post and my head. Left the white letters thou.Plus Dalot too. nah
Not better than Dalot. Either develop Dalot or buy a RB that is there from the get go
Not better than Dalot. Either develop Dalot or buy a RB that is there from the get go
Can you please expand on this? Whilst I like Dalots potential going forward this guy is clearly a much better defender. Did you just pick a side of the debate or have you some knowledge to back this up?
I think Dalot is a good player but what is this based on? I can't pretend to know anything about this kid so I can't make a judgement as I don't watch the championship. Enlighten me
Can we get both? AWB to defend, MA to attack, and we have right side soreted. Or not.
Aarons is the better defender, Dalot is the better attacker. Both need to develop before they are ready to be a MU first team RB. I just don't see the point in having two promising RB's.
Brilliant. I'd rather him over a Meunier nor a Trippierhttps://www.skysports.com/share/11739742
Apparently our second choice if we don’t get Wan Bissaka, at least we’re targeting the right type of players and trying to address problem positions.
They are both good all around FBs who can attribute in attack and defense.
https://www.skysports.com/share/11739742
Apparently our second choice if we don’t get Wan Bissaka, at least we’re targeting the right type of players and trying to address problem positions.
Can't we just get one player that can do both?Can we get both? AWB to defend, MA to attack, and we have right side soreted. Or not.
Good post thatWould rather have him than AWB. Made a thread about him not that long ago:
http://www.redcafe.net/threads/max-aarons.447849/#post-24186340
I know that english football culture have a tendency to evaluate a fullback mainly on his ability to defend. And since a fullback is a defender I guess that makes sense. In some teams and systems it might be a good approach too.
If you play a defensive and reactive football you will probably be happy with your fullback if he is rock solid defending, but offers little going forward. But there is a problem with that in a more proactive and attacking team, the way I see it.
If a player offer little going forward, there is an inherent limitation to his potential overall contribution depending on the other team. The player will not do much more than help stop the other team through defending. If you can attack there is, in theory, no limitation to your potential contribution going forward.
The best teams in the PL limit the other teams through sheer domination of play. Take Liverpool as an example. Trent Alexander-Arnold is not a very good defender and certainly not at AWBs level in my opinion. I doubt that AWB would struggle against Rashford the way TAA has. Regardless, Liverpool still only conceeded 22 goals this year.
Would Liverpool conceed much less with a better player than TAA? Probably not. Despite his limitations defending, its good enough most of the time. And the other teams are, knowing the attacking threat TAA represent, careful when attacking. Being a better defender would have a very limited value to TAA.
Attacking wise, on the other side, there does not appear to be a limitation to his contribution currently. He has offered more assists and key passes than most attacking midfielders (and a lot of attackers), including our very own Paul Pogba. And unfortunatly, I think there is a lot more to come from him!
That is why I would be very careful paying a lot of money for a fullback who has only proven that he is great at defending. If we develop our team the way we should, being a great defender will be of limited value compared to being a great attacker. Being good on the ball will be of huge importance and value. Both to create a team that can dominate with the ball and to the attacking contribution he will provide against some of the defensive, reactive low-block type of teams we face.
I can not say for sure that AWB does not have more to his game than what he has shown at Crystal Palace. He probably has. But I would be very surprised if he had the same passing ability (linkup, through balls, crosses) and flair as players like Robertson and Trent-Arnold. If he do, he would be one of Palace best weapon going forward and I’m sure Hodgson would try to make use of that to a bigger degree than what he has.
Max Aarons do not have the same crossing ability as Trent-Arnold. But on other areas, he is even better going forward. His ball control and low gravity almost makes him reminicent of David Silva or Bernardo Silva. He also have, like Trent-Arnold and Robertson, the ability to quickly spot an attacking opportunity going forward.
In short, I feel much more confident in Aarons ability as an attacking fullback. AWB might have potential, but has yet to prove it.
A rare post..someone talking sense.Would rather have him than AWB. Made a thread about him not that long ago:
http://www.redcafe.net/threads/max-aarons.447849/#post-24186340
I know that english football culture have a tendency to evaluate a fullback mainly on his ability to defend. And since a fullback is a defender I guess that makes sense. In some teams and systems it might be a good approach too.
If you play a defensive and reactive football you will probably be happy with your fullback if he is rock solid defending, but offers little going forward. But there is a problem with that in a more proactive and attacking team, the way I see it.
If a player offer little going forward, there is an inherent limitation to his potential overall contribution depending on the other team. The player will not do much more than help stop the other team through defending. If you can attack there is, in theory, no limitation to your potential contribution going forward.
The best teams in the PL limit the other teams through sheer domination of play. Take Liverpool as an example. Trent Alexander-Arnold is not a very good defender and certainly not at AWBs level in my opinion. I doubt that AWB would struggle against Rashford the way TAA has. Regardless, Liverpool still only conceeded 22 goals this year.
Would Liverpool conceed much less with a better player than TAA? Probably not. Despite his limitations defending, its good enough most of the time. And the other teams are, knowing the attacking threat TAA represent, careful when attacking. Being a better defender would have a very limited value to TAA.
Attacking wise, on the other side, there does not appear to be a limitation to his contribution currently. He has offered more assists and key passes than most attacking midfielders (and a lot of attackers), including our very own Paul Pogba. And unfortunatly, I think there is a lot more to come from him!
That is why I would be very careful paying a lot of money for a fullback who has only proven that he is great at defending. If we develop our team the way we should, being a great defender will be of limited value compared to being a great attacker. Being good on the ball will be of huge importance and value. Both to create a team that can dominate with the ball and to the attacking contribution he will provide against some of the defensive, reactive low-block type of teams we face.
I can not say for sure that AWB does not have more to his game than what he has shown at Crystal Palace. He probably has. But I would be very surprised if he had the same passing ability (linkup, through balls, crosses) and flair as players like Robertson and Trent-Arnold. If he do, he would be one of Palace best weapon going forward and I’m sure Hodgson would try to make use of that to a bigger degree than what he has.
Max Aarons do not have the same crossing ability as Trent-Arnold. But on other areas, he is even better going forward. His ball control and low gravity almost makes him reminicent of David Silva or Bernardo Silva. He also have, like Trent-Arnold and Robertson, the ability to quickly spot an attacking opportunity going forward.
In short, I feel much more confident in Aarons ability as an attacking fullback. AWB might have potential, but has yet to prove it.
A rare post..someone talking sense.
You have to look at the overall contribution of a player to the team, not just his personal stats.
To take it to the extreme, what s the use of having a defender with 100 per cent tackle success and the pass to the team mate who is not in the best position?
The team will still lose possession but the player personal stats look good
Get Meunier let AWB run down his contract till a year and then swoop if proven for 2 seasons again.