I personally think this is a bit of a convenient excuse we tell ourselves to allow us to focus anger/hatred on a player rather than the club or team as a whole. We are always worried about players not wanting to be here, but where is it that we are proposing their hearts want to be instead? Manchester City? PSG? Juventus? Personally, except the sunshine in Spain - I don’t see why a player wouldn’t, under normal circumstances, be happy to be at United. By United, I mean a United that is one of the top sides.
If in a few years where we are 5th or 6th a player like Bruno wants to leave United, I think it will be unfair to paint him as some sort of mercenary who just wants money. We pay as well as any team. If a player like Sancho or whoever chose Liverpool or City over us in the summer, we also need to face the reality that it is unlikely to be because these players just dreamt of wearing a Liverpool or City shirt instead of a United one.
Collectively, we need to all take a bit of responsibility for some of these things in the market. I can’t really think of any player in recent years who joined us for money, at least more than any other move he could have made. Sánchez was given a great contract here, yes. But what are we proposing, that his REAL dream was to join Manchester City instead? If he went to City and it worked out better, would it be because he just loves them more? I’m not saying all of these players have an undying love for Manchester United, but I am saying that the players who go and do well at City, Liverpool, PSG, Juventus, Inter etc do not have any greater love for them either. Most players probably don’t care, they want to play ‘at the top of the game’, which will of course include great money, but also competitiveness and exposure. Of late, we haven’t been the happiest place to be at. Players join us and become media targets, clouded by a consensus of underachievement and failure. Before long, it wouldn’t surprise me if it’s a place they want to leave. But if they leave and go to Inter it isn’t because it was Inter in their hearts all along.
If we limit our signings to players who simply want to play for United alone, the pool will likely be small, and any players we have who will never think of leaving despite how we are doing are probably the ones who are of no interest to other big clubs.
I just think there’s a bit too much of that ‘player clearly doesn’t want to be at the club’ in the game tbh. All the top players doing well at top clubs over all the years in footy is not because they were at the clubs of their childhood dreams. You sign a top player and pay him well and make him believe in something, he will do his job and play as well as he can for you. There is overwhelming evidence in support of that anyway. If Nedved’s move from Lazio to Juve never happened, I’m sure he would have happily gone and signed for Madrid or United instead and become the same top player if he had joined say Fiorentina or Valencia who we’re about to decline (if my timing is right), he probably would have left after a few years if things didn’t work out.
My point here is more general, not Raiola or Pogba/De Ligt related. Just about the theory of players not wanting to be here. Herrera probably only ‘wants’ to be at Zaragoza. Beyond that, he was doing his job. When it served his career to leave Bilbao it did, and likewise United.