ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
So I'll try to explain using a more simple approach. With Blind having a bad game: he may not get skinned directly, but he's in bad position that create gap in which shuffle our defense line and hit us. City second goal, Kante goal, Blind stupidly broke our offside trap in 1st goal and 2nd goal vs West Ham last season as well as unreasonable marking on ReidIt's not a conspiracy theory so much as an opinion and trying to make sense of the situation.
Blind has had a few poor games no doubt but mostly at CB which isn't his natural position. He's played the majority of his career at LB, and is a much better player than Darmian going forward and defensively. So it seems strange to me that a right back who is in awful form is being preferred to him at LB.
(Sorry to use this game as preference. Trying to make the point about the issue with Blind.)
... Blind for most part is better but his mistake is like sudden death and hit the team harder as it's unpredictable.
With Darmian having a mare like yesterday: he's still in correct defensive position making Tottenham players to en-route to calculated trapped area where Rojo, Pogba, Martial then Rashford were instructed to routinely track back and help. In a sense it went as plan taking into consideration of Darmian being consistently flawed. Tottenham right side attackers played right into Mourinho hand as Son is not that good while Sissoko has no end product.
I understand your point with Blind spent more time learning his trade at LB than Darmian does. However, in case of positioning and keeping defensive line shape, Darmian for all his flaw and un-Italian softness, at the very least he has the Italian positional discipline in him. I believe that was what Mourinho looked for and trusted this risky approach with Darmian
Last edited: