Archie Leach
Gooner
Jenkinson. Bellerin's only played about eight senior matches, none for us.Bellerin to be his back up ?
Jenkinson. Bellerin's only played about eight senior matches, none for us.Bellerin to be his back up ?
He's at the same level, in my opinion.
He'll look better in a team that actually dominates possession most of the time. Less isolated defending to do over the 90 minutes, and more time spent going forward. He'll look good there.
Don't agree. I think Sagna is quite comfortably the better defender and just as productive going forward, despite not being as dynamic.He's better than Sagna currently probably and starting for France ahead of him, but not much in it.
Yeah. Actually on second thoughts, Sagna is a better player. But I think Debuchy will look a good player at Arsenal - a team with an actual style of play, and who dominate most of their games. Less isolation, less defending full-stop.Don't agree. I think Sagna is quite comfortably the better defender and just as productive going forward, despite not being as dynamic.
Don't get me wrong, I think he'll do alright there. Like Alastair has said though, you aren't going to upgrade on Sagna who was an excellent and integral player for them, but I'm very confident he will be nowhere near as influential as Sagna was. Arsenal are a side who have become a far more cohesive and compact side defensively, so his areas of weakness being his positioning and recklessness probably won't be as exposed.Yeah. Actually on second thoughts, Sagna is a better player. But I think Debuchy will look a good player at Arsenal - a team with an actual style of play, and who dominate most of their games. Less isolation, less defending full-stop.
I don't think Newcastle (or their disjointed, mish-mash style) flatters anyone who isn't scoring goals. There are a few good players in there - but in a horrible team.
Top fullbacks are hard to replace, not exactly a tonne of them.
That's true enough. I like Arsenal, they operate like a proper club. Replacing a good fullback with another Frenchie, reaks of financial economics. They should be aiming higher imo.
That's true enough. I like Arsenal, they operate like a proper club. Replacing a good fullback with another Frenchie, reaks of financial economics. They should be aiming higher imo.
Nonsense. There aren't that many top right backs available and Debuchy is already a seasoned EPL player and starts ahead of Sagna for France. I just don't see where economics is the priority here when it's clear for most who has seen Debuchy play that he's a quality right back. He now has better players at Arsenal to play with and that can only raise his game up a level or two. Sometimes we as fans need to see potential than thinking the fix is always spending a lot of money or getting a ready made replacement. It doesn't always work out the easy way.
Who though?
Debuchy knows the league, knows some players and is experienced. He should have no trouble in adapting with the move and I daresay he will be a lot more motivated playing for us than Newcastle.
For the price touted I think this is a good deal. I wish he was as solid as Sagna though, but there aren't any RB's available that are ATM.
It seems that Juanfran has been Wenger's first choice but he would cost a bomb.
I'm sure if Debuchy wasn't French, Wenger wouldn't be going anywhere near him.[/B] He might be a decent defender but he's incredibly wasteful going forward. Football is a weird sport at times and like you said he could step up his game with better players around him. He didn't look all that for the French national team, so i have my doubts. Personally, i think the price reflects his level. Maybe it's just a case of Wenger concentrating on other areas of the pitch with this Summers transfer budget.
Why not Aurier?
You obviously are a bit naïve as to how things work. You'd find Spanish managers going for Spanish players and French managers preferring French players...it's a language thing. And it will always be easier for Wenger to woo French players as he's held in very high esteem in France and French players do look up to him. As I said, Debuchy playing for a better club like Arsenal and training with a better manager and players there will only make him a better player. The price of a player these days hardly reflect whether that said player is going to be an asset to a squad or not. You need to give players a chance and make your assessment then. In contrast, if he went out and bought a right back for 15 to 20 million it would have been no guarantee that the money represented quality to the team.
I fully understand the reasons behind managers choosing people with the same Nationality as themselves. Sometimes they can be blinded by their lack of qualities, or on the flip side see qualities other managers can't. It won't be the First time iv'e been wrong about a player, but imo i just don't see Debuchy reaching the levels Arsenal should be aiming for. He's 28 too. If he's going to improve under Wenger it'll have to be from day One.
I'm a 'give the player a chance' sort of guy. I realize in the age of Football Manager fans attach quality and value of a player to a team with money; I'm old school and just don't see it that way most of the time. And Wenger does have an impeccable track record of making players better. It's no secret why a lot of his ex players look up to him as a manager.
Aye, that's all we can do as football fans i suppose. At least give the guy a chance to prove himself. It just seems like a downgrade from Sagna. City have certainly been a cash rich thorn in your sides of late. Arsenal would of won the league by now it wasn't for City doubling every cnuts wages who has a good season in the PL. That's another story altogether though.