Gio
★★★★★★★★
Great work Harms. Has there ever been a more multi-faceted player?
I've compiled this quite long compilation from 2 seasons that Gullit had spent at PSV — before winning Ballon d'Or (on the back of his 1986/87 PSV season) and becoming the world record transfer when enamoured Berlusconi decided to sign him and van Basten for AC Milan. Funnily enough, Gullit was worth almost 6 times more than van Basten — €6.75m to €1.13m, and when you look at their performances at Eredivisie, it's hard to argue against those valuations.
The passing compilation starts at 6:30, and it's, again, something that I'm immensely proud of. Hopefully this video takes off.
Great work Harms. Has there ever been a more multi-faceted player?
Cheers. I think it’s unlikely that anyone from pre-50’s had a comparable physique to Gullit, which is something that separates him from the next tier of all-rounded geniuses like Beckenbauer/Cruyff/Di Stéfano...Nice intro and great video.
Maybe some obscure old-school South-American players like pedernera.
But yeah, Gullit is the last Total Football Player
I've compiled this quite long compilation from 2 seasons that Gullit had spent at PSV — before winning Ballon d'Or (on the back of his 1986/87 PSV season) and becoming the world record transfer when enamoured Berlusconi decided to sign him and van Basten for AC Milan. Funnily enough, Gullit was worth almost 6 times more than van Basten — €6.75m to €1.13m, and when you look at their performances at Eredivisie, it's hard to argue against those valuations.
The passing compilation starts at 6:30, and it's, again, something that I'm immensely proud of. Hopefully this video takes off.
I've compiled this quite long compilation from 2 seasons that Gullit had spent at PSV — before winning Ballon d'Or (on the back of his 1986/87 PSV season) and becoming the world record transfer when enamoured Berlusconi decided to sign him and van Basten for AC Milan. Funnily enough, Gullit was worth almost 6 times more than van Basten — €6.75m to €1.13m, and when you look at their performances at Eredivisie, it's hard to argue against those valuations.
The passing compilation starts at 6:30, and it's, again, something that I'm immensely proud of. Hopefully this video takes off.
Good performance but my God how shit was that Barca team....anyways, a good performance from Johan though same weaknesses appear in every game so hopefully he stops being treated as a superman in drafts. We plan to cover every game from his peak so hopefully we will all be closer to how good he really was.
What are they?
Attacking movement 9/10
Finishing 8/10 (amazing header and a couple of great shots)
Workrate 7,5/10
Defensive contribution 5/10 (not for the lack of trying!)
Crossing 8/10
Passing 5/10
Ball retention 5/10
I've watched yours - but was interested in an assessement with more background.watch the compilations and you will see
This was harms breaking his performance fom one of the games and this pretty much applies for every game we did so far(ok finishing will vary a bit).
I've watched yours - but was interested in an assessement with more background.
From first watch I'd say passing would be rated too low (era adjusted), while finishing was worse (as you say, it varies each game). I kinda understand the defensive rating, as often his timing seems a bit off & success rate is low, but it's hard to judge outside of full games.
But I'll have to watch it again with your judgement in mind.
Ah okay. Was wondering, as his passing seemed good to me (on 70s standards).this last one? Id say that was his best game passing/defensive wise out of all we made so far.
Neeskens seems to go to ground more quickly than Bobby Carlos used to do. He certainly puts his foot in but it isn't that successful. Looking at a number of the all-touch compilations it looks like he would be most suited being the furthest forward of a midfield three rather than as B2B player. In a way he reminds me of Steven Gerrard.
His passing also seemed great to me along with pushing the team forward, but I also stand firmly on overrated scale. His positioning and timing in the defensive phase is more than questionable (questionable on that GOAT scale as he is seen here).
Thinking he would be the kind of player who could disrupt Xavi for example is almost funny to me. Am mentioning Xavi because of that last game between Bepo and Pat. Probably the worst player for Neeskens because of his impulsive defensive reactions and Xavi's abilities.
And how does this affect the current draft plans of @Pat_Mustard
Belated vindication for this Mustard horror show when I dropped Neeskens Vs your Xaviesta and immediately wondered what the feck I'd done
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/the...jim-beam-vs-pat_mustard.458074/#post-26197395
Fitting that @harms corrects our impression of him considering he misled us with the midfield 2 of Neeskens-Falcao from a few drafts ago
Yeah good points .I thought the same Gerrard comparison too (although I'd say Gerrard is much more suited to a more defensive gig based on the DM role for England around 2001-2004). I've no issues with a b2b role with Neesken's energy and hustle, but his diving in needs some systematic protection - either from being really compact or from the right holding / defensively aware partners around him.Neeskens seems to go to ground more quickly than Bobby Carlos used to do. He certainly puts his foot in but it isn't that successful. Looking at a number of the all-touch compilations it looks like he would be most suited being the furthest forward of a midfield three rather than as B2B player. In a way he reminds me of Steven Gerrard.
Was interesting to see Ajax playing with their backs against the wall for once, they won the first leg 2-1, took the lead early in this 2nd leg at Highbury and sort of set up shop at the back, with only Cruyff & Keizer really playing as forwards.
As you can see Neeskens was heavily involved defensively but barely ventured forward as a result. Did get under the skins of the Arsenal players due to his overly physical approach though
A cracking match-winning assist (Baggio) in what proved to be a closely fought encounter. Have to say Dunga always impresses me whenever I see him play.
Fully agree. He came through in a stacked generation of Dutch central midfielders and outcapped them all. An ever present from Euro 96, World Cup 00, Euro 00 and 04. Find it bizarre how he has almost been forgotten, while others from that era have been celebrated to the hilt.From the Netherlands great midfielders i think Cocu deserves more credit. He wasn't as high energy or as much of a goal threat as Neeskens and not as athletic or good defensively as Rijkaard and Davids, but i think his ability to organise the team while on the ball was the strongest (seems often forgotten when talking about exellent passing midfielders of his era) and very versatile.
Great work @Šjor Bepo. Safe to say I watched the minute it was uploaded. Lost count of how many times he ghosted past Sammer like he wasn't there. Some lovely examples of that footwork and balance that very few of the great CMs have ever had. Two assists and should have been a third if not for Clelland's shot striking the inside of the post. Shame actually for him that we didn't have depth in quality, especially at the full-back positions and up top. So much fell on his shoulders to create.
First step to answering some questions on Djalma which arose around @Isotope's Christmas Tree draft team. Brazil was a pleasant surprise in several ways in that game, and I'll write a post when I've watched some more for cross checking.
Absolutely. Part of the discussion was about roles he could play beyond old school defensive FB, and that one would make perfect use of his abilities, imo.as for Djalma, for me he looks like a perfect RCB in a back three.
Lothar who? What a player, been quite an eye opening experience watching him play for Fiorentina in the late eighties, mainly whilst watching Baggio . I've rated him as a player but his 90s version did seem a tad bit boring and predictable. Not the 80s one though.
Anyways his insane pressing ability, defensive positioning and astute use of the ball (very adventurous and forward oriented, yet efficient) really stand out. Really tried to emphasize on his closing down and pressing - cutting down the angles for the opposition player, frequently leading to turn overs. Keep in mind that this Inter side would go on to win the Serie A by a whopping 11 points that season, and it boasted the likes of Mätthaus, Matteoli and Berti in midfield, an uber dynamic and an imposing engine room.
If that doesn't convince you, just watch it for Dunga's OTT hilarious reactions, that alone should make it worth your while
Great stuff. Classic use of his infamous backside for his first goal (and several instances throughout the match). Also, that ball at 1.50, leading to his second goal, was quite exquisite to say the least. Souness looked to have a great game too.
I'm sure all the poor sods who utilised Dalglish as the lone forward in their draft games, would have loved to have acesss to that compilation when they were making their case for it .
Tbf, I also saw him differently until very recently when I started to wonder whether he was really such an influence all over the pitch.
He is still a fantastic player mind you, but I do feel he needs a better defensive partner behind him and for example I personally think Robson was better all around player and more influential in that b2b role looking at both phases (offensive and defensive) of his game.
Edit: just seen the match thread. He had Dunga there, that is pretty much perfect for him. No vindication!!
Those were my thoughts as well on the comp I watched recently. He often played high in possession and manically counterpressed when Barca lost the ball. So maybe that made sense in a purely disruptive kind of way?3) combination of those first two factors that Neekens was simply trying to disrupt the attacking player so that the guy behind him could actully make the tackle?
Those were my thoughts as well on the comp I watched recently. He often played high in possession and manically counterpressed when Barca lost the ball. So maybe that made sense in a purely disruptive kind of way?
Or maybe he just did that all the time, others here can probably say. And it must be said that even super-aggressive counterpressing can be done with more composure.