Matěj Kovář | Leverkusen watch

He had a good game yesterday and made a crucial save at the end to rescue the 3 points.

In terms of his perspective at the club, the plan seems to be pretty obvious. Hradecky will be number 1 this season while Kovar gets the Europa games. This season is for adapting purposes and I expect him to be number 1 starting from next season forward. We would never pay 7-8 million for someone whos just meant to be a backup keeper for several years.
After witnessing Onana and his disaster performances, part of me wishes that we would have done the same thing with De Gea and Kovar. But I think the last months of the season and the disaster class De Gea pulled during the FA Cup final basically sealed his fate.

When it comes to Kovar, every time I've seen him play he always impressed me with his maturity, even at the senior level. His performances in the pre season have to be our best GK performances of this season so far(which speaks volumes about our current GK situation). He was good at everything: assured in possession, good at beating the press, very good reflexes and he even claimed high balls(which coming from the last 5 years DDG was quiet the refereshing change of pace).

Instead we went with the short term quick fix approach yet again and we've landed a player that we hope is going to come good(next to Mount and Amrabat). Now I know that you might be thinking that if Kovar stayed, he could have ended up the same way. True, but at least we would have a had an experienced, yet limited GK that we could fall back on and he wouldn't have cost us 1/3 of our summer budget. Could have sold him next summer too if we decided he wasn't good enough.


So far the only players that have trully impressed me this season were all academy graduates: Mejbri, Mainoo, Garnacho. It's sad to think that we might have had our GK long term solution in the academy, but instead we went on and spent 40+ million on a keeper that have severe flaws with the fundamentals we hope is going to come good. That money could have been better spent elsewhere: getting a better RB or a higher quality CM, but instead it looks like it's more of the same.

In times like these I especially miss SAF, because that's what he would have done. He would have slowly phased out DDG in favor of Kovar or Vitek.
 
He was solid during preseason, dunno why club had to sell.
 
As talented as he is I’m glad we let him leave and progress into hopefully what will be a future United goalkeeper. International experience will surely help too.
 
If he ends up really good then United are obviously going to be in for him, he’s spoken highly of us since his departure.
Basically this in reply to @ Stefan92. I’m looking a year or 2 down the line depending on development of both him and Onana.
 
If he ends up really good then United are obviously going to be in for him, he’s spoken highly of us since his departure.

When he was sold there were reports of a buyback clause, or at the least a first refusal.
 
Played a very good cup semi final yesterday with a few strong saves. Will be interesting if he can be a real challenge to Hradecky next season who is having his best season for us as well.
 


Mmmmm, we let this guy go??? I wonder why?????
Always thought he looked a very good keeper in the academy highlights, admittedly not always the best way to judge a player, but never seemed to be given the opportunity.
He would certainly have had to earn his wages if he was playing now for United, and I rate him quite highly, now has a bundesliga champions medal, and possibility of a Europa League winners medal.
 
Last edited:
Mmmmm, we let this guy go??? I wonder why?????
It's really weird. All the talk about needing a keeper who is good with the ball at his feet to improve the buildup and then letting this guy go who just oozes confidence against the high pressing. Sure it would have been a gamble to put him as first choice, but would he have been worse than Onana? I doubt it, considering how the season went.

But what's done is done, now he is the designated heir to take over from Hradecky in Leverkusen, has won the first title of his career and probably is quite happy about that.
 
It's really weird. All the talk about needing a keeper who is good with the ball at his feet to improve the buildup and then letting this guy go who just oozes confidence against the high pressing. Sure it would have been a gamble to put him as first choice, but would he have been worse than Onana? I doubt it, considering how the season went.

But what's done is done, now he is the designated heir to take over from Hradecky in Leverkusen, has won the first title of his career and probably is quite happy about that.

Well it has worked out well for him, and I am happy to see him have a good career, but as always we come out looking like idiots.
 
Hopefully we have a buy back
 
Mmmmm, we let this guy go??? I wonder why?????
Always thought he looked a very good keeper in the academy highlights, admittedly not always the best way to judge a player, but never seemed to be given the opportunity.
He would certainly have had to earn his wages if he was playing now for United, and I rate him quite highly, now has a bundesliga champions medal, and possibility of a Europa League winners medal.
He starts for Leverskeusen?
 
Football manager seems to think so. We have a 17m buyback clause in the game. :lol:

I seem to remember it being mentioned when he left, but was not sure
 
It's really weird. All the talk about needing a keeper who is good with the ball at his feet to improve the buildup and then letting this guy go who just oozes confidence against the high pressing. Sure it would have been a gamble to put him as first choice, but would he have been worse than Onana? I doubt it, considering how the season went.

But what's done is done, now he is the designated heir to take over from Hradecky in Leverkusen, has won the first title of his career and probably is quite happy about that.

I err on the side of giving youth a chance, always. That being said, I think Onana is coming good and he's certainly not been helped by the constant makeshift defense and no midfield protection. With Kovar it is very different being coached by Alonso in a much less pressurised environment playing in a side that's extremely well balanced to being here at this clusterfeck of a side. I doubt he'd have developed as well. And we still have the buy-back (whether he'd want to come back is another matter). It certainly was the correct decision for him.
 
He starts for Leverskeusen?
In EL and German Cup, in the league Hradecky still is first choice. But as he is already 34 there is a clear path for Kovar to replace him as first choice and this seems also to be what the club aims for.
 
Fair play to him and he's now a champion, but my word what was the point in letting him go and buying Bayindir??
Ten Hag doesn't have a clue on squad building or recruitment. Simply poo.

If he's staying, that responsibility needs to be stripped from him surely
 
because we needed exactly EUR 5m to buy Altay Bayındır
We let Kovar go and bought Bayindir, who cannot be trusted to play any games, and Onana who was a disaster half of the season

It would be hilarious if I ddint care about this club. What a dumb transfer plan
 
I like how he catches it and doesn't just turn to stone and let it bounce off him a la Onana.
 
Ten Hag doesn't have a clue on squad building or recruitment. Simply poo.

If he's staying, that responsibility needs to be stripped from him surely
Surely he can’t stay after this joke of a season. No manager has survived a non CL full season and the new regime accepting that would be a bit odd.
 
We let Kovar go and bought Bayindir, who cannot be trusted to play any games, and Onana who was a disaster half of the season

It would be hilarious if I ddint care about this club. What a dumb transfer plan

Onana was always going to be ETH's number one keeper, so Kovar would have been warming the bench all season, but why not a season long loan?
 
I err on the side of giving youth a chance, always. That being said, I think Onana is coming good and he's certainly not been helped by the constant makeshift defense and no midfield protection. With Kovar it is very different being coached by Alonso in a much less pressurised environment playing in a side that's extremely well balanced to being here at this clusterfeck of a side. I doubt he'd have developed as well. And we still have the buy-back (whether he'd want to come back is another matter). It certainly was the correct decision for him.
Could we have kept DDG for another year or 2, and rotated with Kovar?

edit: I guess we could have under another manager but I can't see EtH doing that. The GK transfers last summer really wind me up.
 
Could we have kept DDG for another year or 2, and rotated with Kovar?

No. DDG was terrible at the end and needed to be replaced. Onana is a much better goalkeeper. First part of the season Onana was bad in the CL but did okayish in the league. Since he returned from the Afcon he has been a good goalkeeper.

I dont see how keeping Kovar would have changed much. I suppose we didnt have to buy Bayindir but maybe Kovar wanted to go and have a chance to become the number one somewhere. Something he did fail at because he is riding the bench in Germany now. He wasnt going to get that chance to fight for the number one spot at Manchester United. Onana was always going to be number one and rightfully.

Besides that, Bayindir hardly cost anything. We have more expensive loans than his transferfee. Glazers take out more money as dividend. The only difference is Kovar on the bench instead of Bayindir.
 
Could we have kept DDG for another year or 2, and rotated with Kovar?

edit: I guess we could have under another manager but I can't see EtH doing that. The GK transfers last summer really wind me up.

Getting rid of Dave was absolutely the right decision. The build up play is a disaster with a GK like him. And while I say that, I still love Dave. He was amazing for us but his time here was up.
 
Getting rid of Dave was absolutely the right decision. The build up play is a disaster with a GK like him. And while I say that, I still love Dave. He was amazing for us but his time here was up.

We could have made easily Kovar number 2 instead of buying Bayindar, Kovar looked pretty good in pre season
 
We could have made easily Kovar number 2 instead of buying Bayindar, Kovar looked pretty good in pre season

He probably wanted some assurances regarding his future playing time. Something we weren’t willing to give, but Bayer were probably able to. Being the starter in all cup comps as early as this season being one.
 
We could have made easily Kovar number 2 instead of buying Bayindar, Kovar looked pretty good in pre season

Could have made me Onana's understudy for all the game time they've gotten, sure Id have managed against Newport. Club sold as they wanted a more experienced back up, we'll see a lot more of this going forward, as that's what City do. Endless loans generally do not work well, player is either ready to play or sold with a clause. Seems very good practice to me.