GoonerBear
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2020
- Messages
- 3,501
- Supports
- Arsenal
Just making sure, you do realise he's talking about Mbappe here and not Odegaard?
YES. Now let me tell you all about that time I reenacted the Bergkamp goal in a futsal game. It was actually even better because I made the ball go over the defender(who was like 2.10 meters tall!) instead of around and then I humilated the goalkeeper too by scoring between his legs. It was a game winning goal too! Truly the greatest moment in futsal history
Nah, i may have exaggerated the defender's height(), but the rest is true enough. Honestly first touch rainbow flick over the defender when the ball's rolling towards you and the defender is running towards the ball isn't all that hard to do, and I was lucky the shot went through the keeper's legs tbf, I did not aim for thatAnd then your mother shouted 'wake up Giorno, time for school'
Very different player to Ozil though, if they expected Ozil to play like this then they signed the wrong playerSaid it before but he's everything for Arsenal that Ozil should've been.
Slightly different positions of course but ultimately all the play in the final third goes through him at some stage.
We already had Bruno when he joined Arsenal, no?I can't believe he moved clubs, and not to us, when we had Ole as manager. Was he (Ole) not asked of that at The Overlap?
We already had Bruno when he joined Arsenal, no?
I believe when they loaned him, we also already had Bruno, who plays in the same position and was for a while more effective than Odegaard. It's revisionism at its best.We had, but still.
They even loaned at first, they got to test drive him.
As a Norwegian it pisses me off Haaland and Ødegaard both moved clubs when we had Ole. Haaland's not on Ole though, that's the clubs fault.
Truly, the one that got away. And for what
Yeah I got that. It was more me laughing at the fact that there’s this weird niche subgroup on the Caf that make out Mbappe is simply a rogue mercenary and not, you know, the best player in world football right now. Like Madrid are doing Mbappe a favour by saying “ahhh go on then, you can join our club!!”Just making sure, you do realise he's talking about Mbappe here and not Odegaard?
We already had Bruno when he joined Arsenal, no?
Dunno if he'd start over Kroos but if we had him we wouldn't be desperate for Kroos not to retire...and Odegaard was actually oursOwh come on First Pedri, now Odegaard. What’s with you clamoring for players that wouldn’t make the first 11?
He is great, but simply not good enough for a starting position for us. Works fantastic in this Arsenal setup and that is fine. He was clearly levels below what we had back when Kroos-Modric were playing and he still isn’t at the level of someone like Jude.
Damn rightLike Madrid are doing Mbappe a favour by saying “ahhh go on then, you can join our club!!”
Disagree with this, but kinda besides the point anyway.Odegaard more what you signed Eriksen for (and also what De Jong for long term).
Very different positions and functions. Ozil was similar, regarding position, to De Bruyne or Griezmann; he was more an attacker than a true midfielder; Odegaard is like Modric or Kroos. Not many clubs, at least among the biggest ones, use players like Ozil today; especially when they don't have great finishing skills.Said it before but he's everything for Arsenal that Ozil should've been.
Slightly different positions of course but ultimately all the play in the final third goes through him at some stage.
Still half right
Mbappe perhaps is the best player in the world football right now, but he doesn't get the attention and spotlight he thinks he deserved by playing in Ligue 1.Yeah I got that. It was more me laughing at the fact that there’s this weird niche subgroup on the Caf that make out Mbappe is simply a rogue mercenary and not, you know, the best player in world football right now. Like Madrid are doing Mbappe a favour by saying “ahhh go on then, you can join our club!!”
Many were saying at the time that United should not lower themselves to loan players from big clubs. That it was a waste of time and ressources. Very funny in hindsightWe had, but still.
They even loaned at first, they got to test drive him.
As a Norwegian it pisses me off Haaland and Ødegaard both moved clubs when we had Ole. Haaland's not on Ole though, that's the clubs fault.
I think a lot of credit goes to Mikel and his overselling of the club's history and ideals and support apart from the obviously tangible intelligence he brings in. We were literally a dumpster fire when he took over and possibly worse a year in.Many were saying at the time that United should not lower themselves to loan players from big clubs. That it was a waste of time and ressources. Very funny in hindsight
Real Madrid reject - do not want. Not good enough.Many were saying at the time that United should not lower themselves to loan players from big clubs. That it was a waste of time and ressources. Very funny in hindsight
Owh come on First Pedri, now Odegaard. What’s with you clamoring for players that wouldn’t make the first 11?
He is great, but simply not good enough for a starting position for us. Works fantastic in this Arsenal setup and that is fine. He was clearly levels below what we had back when Kroos-Modric were playing and he still isn’t at the level of someone like Jude.
Coincidentally that period is when I was going to games at the EmiratesI mean, our home support is probably in the relegation zone of the league in the period 2018-2021
Owh come on First Pedri, now Odegaard. What’s with you clamoring for players that wouldn’t make the first 11?
He is great, but simply not good enough for a starting position for us. Works fantastic in this Arsenal setup and that is fine. He was clearly levels below what we had back when Kroos-Modric were playing and he still isn’t at the level of someone like Jude.
No. But he'd bench Tchouameni and Camavinga, easily, atmWouldn't he start ahead of Valverde?
Wouldn't he start ahead of Valverde?
Bellingham plays a role similar to what Havertz is supposed to play for Arsenal I guess so they can play together.
He is better than most of your current midfield aside Kroos who is perhaps on his last legs.I wouldn’t trade any one of Kroos, Jude, Fede, Cama for him. I’d take him over Ceballos though but that would mean he is a bench option. Think for some fans it always becomes a ‘the one that got away’ when players leave and do good.
I compared to Jude because I see Odegaard often in the final third being a creator (tho Jude does much more than that). And we’ve seen what he is like at Madrid. It was not good enough. Good for him making it at Arsenal though.
He is better than most of your current midfield aside Kroos who is perhaps on his last legs.
NB: I believe Modric is done.
Odegaard is a terrific player who is capable of controlling games something Bellingham has not been tasked to do yet, perhaps because he has Kroos and Modric at the moment.
Valverde is a nothing player technically. He does not add anything creatively and controlling games.
Your team got dominated by RBZ ? last week.
He is WAY better than Camavinga right now. And essentially the player we hope Camavinga might become...I wouldn’t trade any one of Kroos, Jude, Fede, Cama for him.
He is WAY better than Camavinga right now. And essentially the player we hope Camavinga might become...
Loving the sanctimony.I wouldn’t trade any one of Kroos, Jude, Fede, Cama for him. I’d take him over Ceballos though but that would mean he is a bench option. Think for some fans it always becomes a ‘the one that got away’ when players leave and do good.
I compared to Jude because I see Odegaard often in the final third being a creator (tho Jude does much more than that). And we’ve seen what he is like at Madrid. It was not good enough. Good for him making it at Arsenal though.
What does Odegaard have to do with Mbappe?He Who Shall Not Be Named But Everybody Says We're Gonna Sign Him This Time
Would Odegaard and Valverde compete for the same spot ? I highly doubt it.Wouldn't he start ahead of Valverde?
Bellingham plays a role similar to what Havertz is supposed to play for Arsenal I guess so they can play together.
Don't care too much about him becoming as good as odegaard in the final third, but in terms of ball progression, line breaking and dictating tempoCamavinga will never become as good as Odegaard in the final third, Odegaard is an elite 10. I would imagine Camavinga being more of a box to box midfielder at his best in the guise of a Kante and if we were to use another player with Arsenal links as a comparison Xhaka.