Pogue Mahone
Closet Gooner.
I don't think he spat on him but kicking someone, hard, in the back of their ankle should always be a penalty.
Do you not think that some of that instruction may come from LVG?
Same with the accusations about him getting into the box too much... do you think that is really Fellaini's decision, or the manager telling him to get into the box and utilise his aerial strength?
I don't think he spat on him but kicking someone, hard, in the back of their ankle should always be a penalty.
It should have been a pen but I couldn't tell when I first saw it, only on the replay.
I don't think the Rojo one was a pen at all.
No i don't, while the runs in the box are, i think, instructions and Fellaini is really good at it.
The huge gap in the right end of our midfield and the lack of cover for the right back can't be an instruction, the movement are way too erratic to be Van gaal instructions.
Fair enough.
I didnt see this huge gap that you are referring to.
In the Chelsea game he obviously was trying to shut down Fabregas and Matic as much as possible (which he did), in the City game after we went down to 10 men I thought he was very disciplined positionally and defended well on that side.
Against Chelsea he was excellent, but against City before the Chris Smalling Show he was chasing the ball no matter where. Which gave City space on the right 2 or 3 times. But he was still good.
QPR: Total: 847, Long: 69. Leicester: Total: 475, Long: 67. For our 3 most recent games it has gone:
City: 473 - 74
Chelsea: 476-68
West Brom: 624 - 77
So QPR yes we had more passes but the Leicester match was basically the same as City and Chelsea.
@Walrus What's with your Mad Winger-like obsession of Fellaini? Besides the penalty in the box against Aguero, did you not see his wayward header from 8 yards out? Also, inexplicably gave the ball away when he was leading a break on the edge of City's 18-yard box. Thought he was okay, certainly not as great as some are making him out to be. He's a brainless idiot who's a liability as far as giving away penalties are concerned. But as others have pointed out, what worries me most about Fellaini playing is that it changes our playing style to a hoof-ball team. Hoping a healthy Falcao, Carrick and Herrera means it's back to the bench for Fellaini.
As others above have pointed out, we've not playing significantly more long balls in the last 3 games than we did in previous games where Fellaini hasn't played.
The bolded is complete nonsense, and certainly far more biased than anything I've seen @Walrus post in this thread
Right, I'm imagining Fellaini cocking up our best chance to get a point against City. Also, fouled Aguero in the box when he caught him from behind which should have been another penalty. What followed with him yelling at Aguero to get up while knowing he fouled him, is acting like an idiot. How many elbows and times he's out of position defensively will it take before you realize that he's actually brainless?He's another that doesn't actually keep his eyes open when the game is on from the looks of things.
How perceptive! It's an internet forum for Christ's sake!The bolded is complete nonsense, and certainly far more biased than anything I've seen @Walrus post in this thread
How perceptive! It's an internet forum for Christ's sake!
I wasn't "having a go" at Walrus because he was "biased". It's an internet forum, after all. Everything here is based on people's opinions. Simply curious why he's such a fan and ardent defender of Fellaini. As for factual inaccuracy, a sample size of two games is hardly conclusive. I'm not saying that his style of play doesn't serve a purpose, but I don't think it's a long-term solution or what we should aspire to. We've got better players to play in forward positions as well as midfield than Fellaini. Or did you miss his wayward header from 8 yards out that went like 10 yards wide? Not sure what you mean about being sarcastic and breaking lifetime habits, do we know each other?You were having a go at Walrus for being the 'Mad Winger of Fellaini', but when people point out your bias its worthy of a sarky comment? Very consistent logic there.
Any chance of you responding to the part in my post that called out your factual inaccuracy? Or if you like you could just ignore the facts and keep on being sarcastic, it'd be a shame to break the habit of a lifetime after all.
Yeah, I know, I need to renew my subscription of 442 and buy the latest release of FM.
Meet me in 2 weeks, then I'll show you..
@Walrus What's with your Mad Winger-like obsession of Fellaini? Besides the penalty in the box against Aguero, did you not see his wayward header from 8 yards out? Also, inexplicably gave the ball away when he was leading a break on the edge of City's 18-yard box. Thought he was okay, certainly not as great as some are making him out to be. He's a brainless idiot who's a liability as far as giving away penalties are concerned. But as others have pointed out, what worries me most about Fellaini playing is that it changes our playing style to a hoof-ball team. Hoping a healthy Falcao, Carrick and Herrera means it's back to the bench for Fellaini.
I wasn't "having a go" at Walrus because he was "biased". It's an internet forum, after all. Everything here is based on people's opinions. Simply curious why he's such a fan and ardent defender of Fellaini. As for factual inaccuracy, a sample size of two games is hardly conclusive. I'm not saying that his style of play doesn't serve a purpose, but I don't think it's a long-term solution or what we should aspire to. We've got better players to play in forward positions as well as midfield than Fellaini. Or did you miss his wayward header from 8 yards out that went like 10 yards wide? Not sure what you mean about being sarcastic and breaking lifetime habits, do we know each other?
Reckon I can live with this.To conclude, not only are you wrong, but you arent even attempting to logically argue why you arent wrong, which is one of the worst types of wrong.
Everyone here would have been screaming for a penalty if that was him (ca Everton days) fouling Rooney or RVP instead of Aguero. But fair enough, let's let the season play out and see how he does.
Most strikers, bar possibly Messi, would have gone down there.I honestly didnt think it was a penalty. There was contact without a doubt, but not sufficient to have any impact if Aguero had chosen to stay on his feet. Aguero was looking for it and went down as soon as he felt a touch.
This. I prefer Herrera's style and overall personality, but Fellaini has been hugely effective. I believe we won the midfield battle against the two best midfields in the league, and Fellaini was largely responsible for that. A few times he had the beating of Yaya and Fernando. Two very physically imposing players. Herrera wouldn't have shied away, but I don't believe he would have won any physical battles with Yaya or Fernando.
I think a midfield diamond of Blind, Fellaini, Herrera and Di Maria gives us a bit of everything.
How many penalties has Fellaini actually conceded in his career?
It was as blatant a penalty as you'll see.I honestly didnt think it was a penalty. There was contact without a doubt, but not sufficient to have any impact if Aguero had chosen to stay on his feet. Aguero was looking for it and went down as soon as he felt a touch.
Has he actually conceded a penalty for us? Maybe he has and it's not instantly coming to my mind. Yep, he should have had one given against him the other day, but this comment is just absurd!@Walrus What's with your Mad Winger-like obsession of Fellaini? Besides the penalty in the box against Aguero, did you not see his wayward header from 8 yards out? Also, inexplicably gave the ball away when he was leading a break on the edge of City's 18-yard box. Thought he was okay, certainly not as great as some are making him out to be. He's a brainless idiot who's a liability as far as giving away penalties are concerned. But as others have pointed out, what worries me most about Fellaini playing is that it changes our playing style to a hoof-ball team. Hoping a healthy Falcao, Carrick and Herrera means it's back to the bench for Fellaini.
Got a good chuckle out of that, then realized you were serious.
Yep, still clueless.
That's twice in 2 days, man. It was okay the first time, but this time, it hurt. It really hurt, man..
@Walrus What's with your Mad Winger-like obsession of Fellaini? Besides the penalty in the box against Aguero, did you not see his wayward header from 8 yards out? Also, inexplicably gave the ball away when he was leading a break on the edge of City's 18-yard box. Thought he was okay, certainly not as great as some are making him out to be. He's a brainless idiot who's a liability as far as giving away penalties are concerned. But as others have pointed out, what worries me most about Fellaini playing is that it changes our playing style to a hoof-ball team. Hoping a healthy Falcao, Carrick and Herrera means it's back to the bench for Fellaini.
No doubt, at times Rafael and Jones have been reckless and hurt us in the past with stupid penalties that make you go "wtf was he thinking?" Rojo is another one that I can see costing us 3 points with a stupid penalty. But you're right, I certainly wouldn't classify them as brainless idiots, maybe brain-dead at times. They're also defenders and offer us plenty in terms of skill and talent.How many penalties did he give away for us?
Now, how many penalties did Rafael, Jones and other players give away for us? Are they all brainless idiots as well? Mind you that besides Fellaini's penalty in that match they should've been given two more: one by Carrick and another one by Rojo. Another two brainless idiots?
And Jesus no, it doesn't fecking change our playstyle to hoof no matter how much you'd like to insist so. Were we playing hoof against Chelsea too? Maybe the hoof tactic we reverted to against City was solely down to the fact that we were down to 10 men? It's a bunch of shite cliches thrown into the air again.
And is the missed header everybody seems to be whining about the one when the ball bounced off his shoulder?
Do you mean like crosses or long balls from deep? On long balls from deep I think it is better to go for a knock-down as it is extremely hard to get enough power and direction on a header from a long-ball.A criticism I have of Fellaini during his last two (very good) games is that when we decide to go direct, he is taking up positions that are not going to hurt the opposition, he is usually taking up spots on the corner of the box. I don't know if it's an instruction from van Gaal or not but he should be right in the middle looking to score. The one time from memory where he did get into a good area between the posts he had the chance against City, yeh it was a pretty bad miss at the end of the day but you could see just how dangerous he can be in that area. I don't see the idea of these knock downs when he might as well knock it into the net if he moves 10 metres closer to goal.
I think you're a tad harsh on Fellaini in this context. While, for me, the jury is still out as to whether or not he is good enough (overall I don't think so to be honest) but I'm willing to give him a chance after his last few performances. Maybe with a bit of confidence he will start to show something.No doubt, at times Rafael and Jones have been reckless and hurt us in the past with stupid penalties that make you go "wtf was he thinking?" Rojo is another one that I can see costing us 3 points with a stupid penalty. But you're right, I certainly wouldn't classify them as brainless idiots, maybe brain-dead at times. They're also defenders and offer us plenty in terms of skill and talent.
Perhaps "brainless idiot" was a bit harsh. Fellaini's never been a player that I wanted at United in the first place, so maybe that "bias" does carry over. I feel that he's clumsy, immobile, borderline dirty, and doesn't possess the requisite technical skills for what playing in our midfield should require. I mean someone put up a clip of Fellaini with a nice, little turn in the City game. Harldy Zidane-esque and something most Premier League midfielders should be able to pull off in their sleep. I understand the desire to add steel and aggression to our midfield, but not at the expense of actual footballing ability. I remember long stretches of the Chelsea game where he was getting bypassed and wasn't involved at all. And yes, the missed header against City is the one that he so badly misjudged it ended up going off his shoulder. And after that no-call penalty against City, was there really a need for him to go and yell at Aguero like that? Stupid shit like that pisses me off.
And I never said that we were playing hoofball, I said I was worried that having Fellaini in there would be too tempting to eventually resort to hoof tactics. Especially when we're down. Most would agree Fellaini's best position (up front as a #10) and attributes (chest control, height) are best-suited for hoofing it. Although maybe it shouldn't be too much of a concern, as I do have faith in LVG to prevent that from happening.
I do hope that Fellaini finds success here, as I would for any United player. It's just that I have my doubts and hope that he doesn't negatively impact us in terms of results and opportunity cost. Having said that, I do think I'll take a little break from this thread as I don't want to appear overly negative, and I've said what I wanted to say. To which most of you have clearly disagreed with.
Rafael is el loco so it is alright.I couldnt care less if one of our players has a go at an opponent. As long as he isnt doing something that is going to get him booked - absolutely, put the fear of god in Aguero or whoever else.
We had images of Rafael standing up to Tevez and shouting at him and Rafael was (rightly) lauded as a hero for it - but Fellaini yells at Aguero and suddenly it is stupid behaviour?