If Ronaldo's legs can be insured for £90m we should take out a policy for Fellaini's chest for at least £40m.
If he lost that chest we'd be in big trouble.
We wouldn't, but he would.
If Ronaldo's legs can be insured for £90m we should take out a policy for Fellaini's chest for at least £40m.
If he lost that chest we'd be in big trouble.
Of course I would - he had a great half all round; did some good defensive work with tackles, clearances, interceptions - passing was decent enough and topped it off with a stunning goal. His introduction literally changed the game as we were dire in the first half.
and contrary to popular belief, it is not the first time he has played well for us either.
The whole team played better due to the manager getting into the players at half time. Fellaini played quite well with a fantastic goal contribution, he still made silly needless fouls and his general play wasn't of the level of the likes of Ander in previous matches.
The goal changes everything which is why he needs to keep it up
The whole team played better due to the manager getting into the players at half time. Fellaini played quite well with a fantastic goal contribution, he still made silly needless fouls and his general play wasn't of the level of the likes of Ander in previous matches.
The goal changes everything which is why he needs to keep it up
He conceded one foul. I sometimes wonder whether people on both sides of these debates about players actually watch the games or just go on the usual cliches/countercliches (new word).
He was pulled up for 2. You don't get to decide how many fouls he made, the referee does. Perhaps you should have watched closer
http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/82...4-2015-West-Bromwich-Albion-Manchester-United
You just dont open up teams with Fellaini as a 10. Moyes tried it so often and it just doesnt work. He doesnt have the ability, as simple as that. He either brings physical domincance into our team or else I dont really see him being used oftenLike last night, we won't always be able to use our fancy, technical players to create goals the way we would all love to. Fellaini is a great, yet very expensive, option to have. While he is at the club, we should use him the best way possible, which is exactly how he was told to play last night. Make sure he is up top when we're in possession of the ball, backing into defenders, and just being a general nuisance. In the last 10 minutes we probably looked at our most dangerous, playing lobbed balls down the middle into Fellaini and Falcao. It's very scruffy, but it's also incredibly difficult to defend when playing against such big strong lads.
I think this is the way to play against Chelsea, who will look to sit deep and prevent any penetration through the defence. Believe it or not, I think Fellaini is the answer to this type of defence. I've said this many times, but Fellaini's first touch when controlling the ball on his chest, and to a lesser extend, on his head, is quite simply, sublime. You could hit the ball from any angle, with any amount of power on it, as long as it is in the vicinity of his chest, he is almost guaranteed to bring it down perfectly. This could be a nightmare for Terry and Cahill to deal with.
Fellaini is probably the best player in the world at what he does. Almost unplayable when he is up for it, and he will truly be up for it on Sunday.
You just dont open up teams with Fellaini as a 10. Moyes tried it so often and it just doesnt work. He doesnt have the ability, as simple as that. He either brings physical domincance into our team or else I dont really see him being used often
You can't really compare United to Everton, can you?Did you watch Everton at all in his last season there? He was their best player and contributed to 19 goals (12 scored, 7 assisted), which is pretty respectable given how utterly hopeless Jelavic and Anichebe were that year. He opened up plenty of teams, including us. Hell last night he 'opened up' West Brom more in 45 minutes than RVP and Mata did all game.
Fellaini has great ability and can be influential both as a CM and as a #10 if used properly and in the right games. In the Premier League especially you need a mix of different types of players or you become too 1-dimensional. Barcelona non-withstanding, teams that plug away trying to be purists regardless of the opposition or whether its actually working end up winning nowt (see Arsenal for the last 10 years).
You can't really compare United to Everton, can you?
He has his strengths but it's not that he's been a brilliant footballer before. He is rather limited and still hasn't found his position yet. He's not good enough to play as a 10 and we have much better players who are better equipped. To see us lump the ball forward to him is not what I want to see and I doubt that would be a winning tacticI'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, and in any case it doesn't constitute an adequate response to any of the points I made. At Everton he played very well and demonstrated his quality and his strengths for all to see. Those strengths haven't fluttered away on the wind because he wears a red shirt with a devil on it instead of a blue shirt with a windmill or whatever on it.
No-ones arguing that he's going to be as key for United as he was at Everton, but that doesn't mean he's not perfectly capable of playing very well for us, as evidenced last night. I find it difficult to believe that people can have watched last night's game and not grudgingly accept that he could have a future at the club.
West Brom's statement on the Fellaini tweet. It's a load of bollocks.In response to incorrect and mischievous reporting, we would like to clarify that our initial tweet about Marouane Fellaini was made as the player removed his tracksuit top.
That was in preparation for his introduction to the game during a period when night-time temperatures were dropping significantly.
We are extremely disappointed that our tweet was taken out of context by mischief-makers.
And that's not least on a night when two teams showed such a commitment to strident and attacking football to once more underline the quality and entertainment value of the Barclays Premier League.
Well done this man. Played with a real purpose tonight and was obviously given good, clear instructions. Good on him.
He has his strengths but it's not that he's been a brilliant footballer before. He is rather limited and still hasn't found his position yet. He's not good enough to play as a 10 and we have much better players who are better equipped. To see us lump the ball forward to him is not what I want to see and I doubt that would be a winning tactic
Firstly he's very underrated technically, you wont see him nipping past players like Iniesta or pinging 50 yard passes like Scholes but he's certainly not 'limited'. You just have to look at the evidence in front of you, he had better passing stats than Herrera last night, both in terms of passes completed and in terms of chances created. His second touch of the ball was an interception-cum-first time-outside-of-the-foot-pass which set Di Maria off down the wing and he scored a great goal. He's clearly far more capable than many on here would like to admit.
Secondly, better equipped for what? The ability to shake things up is important in this league. You can't just plug away at the same thing and expect to win because you're better than the other team. This is why Arsenal struggle; when the fashionable one touch football isn't working they don't have a plan B and they suffer for it. Herrera is by no means inferior to than Fellaini but we looked far more likely to score after the substitution because Fellaini gave us something that Herrera couldn't. Having someone like Fellaini around allows us a completely different set of tactical options which, in situations like last night, will result in us picking up more points over the course of the season than we otherwise could have. No-one's saying he should be a nailed on first-XI player or that he's better than Rooney/Mata/Herrera. What they're saying is that he has attributes that the others can't offer, and that in certain games those attributes can be beneficial to the team.
I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, and in any case it doesn't constitute an adequate response to any of the points I made. At Everton he played very well and demonstrated his quality and his strengths for all to see. Those strengths haven't fluttered away on the wind because he wears a red shirt with a devil on it instead of a blue shirt with a windmill or whatever on it.
No-ones arguing that he's going to be as key for United as he was at Everton, but that doesn't mean he's not perfectly capable of playing very well for us, as evidenced last night. I find it difficult to believe that people can have watched last night's game and not grudgingly accept that he could have a future at the club.
Firstly he's very underrated technically, you wont see him nipping past players like Iniesta or pinging 50 yard passes like Scholes but he's certainly not 'limited'. You just have to look at the evidence in front of you, he had better passing stats than Herrera last night, both in terms of passes completed and in terms of chances created. His second touch of the ball was an interception-cum-first time-outside-of-the-foot-pass which set Di Maria off down the wing and he scored a great goal. He's clearly far more capable than many on here would like to admit.
Fellani had a nice game-probably best as a United player. But, why exaggerate? According to Optima, Herrara was 27/32 (84%) passing; Fellani was 25/30 (83%). Yes, Fellani created two chances and scored a goal. He showed what many here think is his role-a plan B option when things aren't going well. Fellani didn't make the earth move for me despite his good game.
The stats I saw had Fellaini at 83% and Herrera at 81%, I'm not sure why there always seems to be discrepancies between different sources.
Firstly he's very underrated technically, you wont see him nipping past players like Iniesta or pinging 50 yard passes like Scholes but he's certainly not 'limited'. You just have to look at the evidence in front of you, he had better passing stats than Herrera last night, both in terms of passes completed and in terms of chances created. His second touch of the ball was an interception-cum-first time-outside-of-the-foot-pass which set Di Maria off down the wing and he scored a great goal. He's clearly far more capable than many on here would like to admit.
Secondly, better equipped for what? The ability to shake things up is important in this league. You can't just plug away at the same thing and expect to win because you're better than the other team. This is why Arsenal struggle; when the fashionable one touch football isn't working they don't have a plan B and they suffer for it. Herrera is by no means inferior to than Fellaini but we looked far more likely to score after the substitution because Fellaini gave us something that Herrera couldn't. Having someone like Fellaini around allows us a completely different set of tactical options which, in situations like last night, will result in us picking up more points over the course of the season than we otherwise could have. No-one's saying he should be a nailed on first-XI player or that he's better than Rooney/Mata/Herrera. What they're saying is that he has attributes that the others can't offer, and that in certain games those attributes can be beneficial to the team.
I still think he is not a good choice for CM role. I would honestly play him ahead of Mata for now.
He is very useful when he is around the opposition box. As a CM, he still has all the flaws in his game, and a goal does not change that.
Everton's team was build around him. Hoof the ball from every position to his chest. He did well there but he won't do as good here. Actually, he might, if we start playing like Everton did. It will result on a midtable finish though, regardless of Fellaini's goals and assists.I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, and in any case it doesn't constitute an adequate response to any of the points I made. At Everton he played very well and demonstrated his quality and his strengths for all to see. Those strengths haven't fluttered away on the wind because he wears a red shirt with a devil on it instead of a blue shirt with a windmill or whatever on it.
No-ones arguing that he's going to be as key for United as he was at Everton, but that doesn't mean he's not perfectly capable of playing very well for us, as evidenced last night. I find it difficult to believe that people can have watched last night's game and not grudgingly accept that he could have a future at the club.
Not a kneejerk reaction but I think he should start against Chelsea. He must have confidence now and we need power in the middle against them, who will inevitably play with a solid engine room.
Everton's team was build around him. Hoof the ball from every position to his chest. He did well there but he won't do as good here. Actually, he might, if we start playing like Everton did. It will result on a midtable finish though, regardless of Fellaini's goals and assists.
He may play some role here in games when we can't break teams by playing fluid football, but those games will be rare. Just because he hoofed the ball good for them, won't make him a good player here when completely different qualities are required.
The ability to shake things up is important in this league. You can't just plug away at the same thing and expect to win because you're better than the other team. This is why Arsenal struggle; when the fashionable one touch football isn't working they don't have a plan B and they suffer for it. Herrera is by no means inferior to than Fellaini but we looked far more likely to score after the substitution because Fellaini gave us something that Herrera couldn't. Having someone like Fellaini around allows us a completely different set of tactical options which, in situations like last night, will result in us picking up more points over the course of the season than we otherwise could have. No-one's saying he should be a nailed on first-XI player or that he's better than Rooney/Mata/Herrera. What they're saying is that he has attributes that the others can't offer, and that in certain games those attributes can be beneficial to the team.
That first highlighted bit is a typical misapprehension of someone who didn't really watch Everton all that much in 2012/3. Yeah they went long a fair bit but they (including Fellaini) also played some great football, as has been attested to by our resident Everton fans. But whatever, I can see that this isn't a myth that's never going to die.
I'm not really sure why you're arguing with me? Unless your view is that the benefits of having him as another option don't justify him having a place in the squad, in which case I respectfully disagree. I entirely trust Van Gaal to get the best out of him, especially given that he's managed to coax more out of him in one game than Moyes did all of last season. Fellaini at his best is both acceptable midfield cover and a great Plan B and if used right he can become an important part of the squad.