devilish
Juventus fan who used to support United
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2002
- Messages
- 62,915
Jesus Christ, you really don't know him AT ALL.
I trust that a guy from austria will be unbiased in this thread.
Jesus Christ, you really don't know him AT ALL.
Simple question. Is what Pulis does with his team or Allardyce does with his team equal to what Liverpool does under Klopp?Yes because Fellaini has played so much for us this season?
BTW, all long balls are just long passes. The fecking point of the whole concept is to get the ball up field as quick as possible, avoiding it being on the ground.
You can assign whatever name you want to it, a long ball is a long ball. Liverpool under Klopp resulted to "hoof ball" or long ball, whatever the feck you want to call it numerous times this season too.
Fact of the matter is when you pass the ball a long way up field, up in the air, off the ground, it's a long ball/hoof. It's also a fact that Liverpool have done it more than us and it's also a fact that this stance that it's the only football we play is rubbish.
If you're going to criticise someone for something, at least be consistent. I could start branding all our hoofing as 'long passes' too.
Even consistent world class players become inconsistent as soon as they reach Manchester United, what will Arnautovic become here I have no idea....Since when is Arnautovic some uncultured brute?
He's a technically good player, just extremely inconsistent.
I trust that a guy from austria will be unbiased in this thread.
Yeah. We waste Lukaku's ability to run behind defenders with good aerial through passes, instead we often use him as a target man to win headersClearly in certain moments we've used direct football out of tactical ploy or desperation but we play this way less than 5% of the time. It's a bit worrying how many are fixated on the idea thats our standard model of play.
Simple question. Is what Pulis does with his team or Allardyce does with his team equal to what Liverpool does under Klopp?
It's very sad to see the team we have become. We don't need Arnautovic or Mandzukic. Why not improve Martial and Rashford instead? We already saw in 2015/16 that both of them can play as strikers and we depended on them for big games.
It's very sad to see the team we have become. We don't need Arnautovic or Mandzukic. Why not improve Martial and Rashford instead? We already saw in 2015/16 that both of them can play as strikers and we depended on them for big games.
I honestly don't see this.Yeah. We waste Lukaku's ability to run behind defenders with good aerial through passes, instead we often use him as a target man to win headers
Surely it's not an either or situation? One's a striker and one's a midfielder.People genuinely think Arnautovic is better than Willian? Jesus.
They obviously do it far more often and with far inferior players. That being said, all passes thumped up field are hoofs, regardless of the team's attacking quality. What exactly is the difference between a 'long pass' and a 'hoof'? If Liverpool had a taller CF than Firminho, would you also consider their passes all hoofs, considering there is literally no other difference? Both are sent up field, up in the air, instead of opting to play it on the ground.
You could argue that having a target man controlling the ball is the difference between a hoof and a long pass, but then by that logic you'd surely have to also apply that logic to teams like Bayern, Madrid etc. who don't exactly have small forwards when they make long passes.
I just don't buy this nonsense that all we do is hoof, we do it in certain situations but is few and far between. In fact Fellaini barely featured this season, even with our midfielders being injured constantly. Fecking Mctominany was playing given how thin we were running there.
It's just such a boring argument now, it's false and keeps getting branded out around here like we play like West Brom every week, when it's simply not even close to being true.
You could trust that the guy would be more knowledgeable for starters. I'm not saying in any way, that he would be a great success here on the pitch (could go either way really, also which attacking players are a success at United nowadays?), although it would be awesome on a personal level.
However, cheap cliches like "it only takes 1 bad thing for these sort of players to go downhill" are simply ridiculous. He's not a caribbean partyboy ffs. He has a certain "Balkanic" nature/character, but he has matured a lot over the years and I'm not worried in the least about his behaviour.
One of them is intent on leaving and the other still has a lot to learn, which unfortunately isn't a sacrifice we can make next season when the manager's job will be on the line? Also we came 5th that season and couldn't qualify from a CL group of PSV and Wolfsburg, so how much did depending on them really benefit us?
Yeah, at a snails pace with zero excitement. I suppose it’s wishful thinking that we change our approach rather than continue doing what’s not working and what’s boring the fans to death.And then complain when he doesnt hold the ball up or win aerial duels. Do you have any idea how we play football?
Carribean party boy, balkanic nature....that's some sweeping generalisations down there. I've worked with both type of people and i assure you that they are some of the nost hardworking people i've worked with. The balkans provided some of the most hardworking and talented players in the world from Savicevic to Boban right to Vidic and mihajlovic.
If I wanted to stoop low i would suggest you tone your austrianish attitude a notch. That would of course be wrong considering not every austrian is a kurz let alone a haider or a hit...
Godwin's law, nice!
Well, serves me right for wasting my scarce amount of posts on this. Have a nice day, my good man!
Never actually thought i'd ever see this happen.Godwin's law, nice!
Well, serves me right for wasting my scarce amount of posts on this. Have a nice day, my good man!
Yes if Liverpool play a tall targetman upfront and aim longballs at him and hoping that the targetman upfront knocks the ball down and holds it up, then yes they are also playing hoofball. But that's not how they play, they play long balls when they are counter attacking and their front three use their pace and movement to run into the space behind the defenders.They obviously do it far more often and with far inferior players. That being said, all passes thumped up field are hoofs, regardless of the team's attacking quality. What exactly is the difference between a 'long pass' and a 'hoof'? If Liverpool had a taller CF than Firminho, would you also consider their passes all hoofs, considering there is literally no other difference? Both are sent up field, up in the air, instead of opting to play it on the ground.
You could argue that having a target man controlling the ball is the difference between a hoof and a long pass, but then by that logic you'd surely have to also apply that logic to teams like Bayern, Madrid etc. who don't exactly have small forwards when they make long passes.
I just don't buy this nonsense that all we do is hoof, we do it in certain situations but is few and far between. In fact Fellaini barely featured this season, even with our midfielders being injured constantly. Fecking Mctominany was playing given how thin we were running there.
It's just such a boring argument now, it's false and keeps getting branded out around here like we play like West Brom every week, when it's simply not even close to being true.
Yes if Liverpool play a tall targetman upfront and aim longballs at him and hoping that the targetman upfront knocks the ball down and holds it up, then yes they are also playing hoofball. But that's not how they play, they play long balls when they are counter attacking and their front three use their pace and movement to run into the space behind the defenders.
Yes Bayern and Madrid have tall forwards but they don't use them like we use Lukaku and Fellaini(whenever he's been fit). Fellaini didn't feature because of his injury concerns and his contract situation, and he doesn't play as a midfielder for Mourinho, he plays as a number 10 or as an attacking midfielder.
It's very sad to see the team we have become. We don't need Arnautovic or Mandzukic. Why not improve Martial and Rashford instead? We already saw in 2015/16 that both of them can play as strikers and we depended on them for big games.
I like him, he has that presence and arrogance that I love in United players. If he's ok with being a squad player then I think it would work. Would be a better plan B than Fellaini anyway! Does anyone know if he can play on the right?
Come on guys let’s just put our differences about Mourinho aside for one minute and just collectively be Manchester United fans. Under them circumstances I think we can all agree that signing fecking Arnautovic would be a huge back step.
He's actually been very good as a striker for West Ham.
When we played them away he absolutely terrorised our defence, never seen Smalling have such a hard time before.
He runs behind really well, very strong and has a great shot, what's not to like?
Oh yeah he played for Stoke before so he can't be good enough
You sure, seen him get terrorised by attackers a fair few times?