Denis79
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
- Messages
- 8,231
When he's in full speed he's lethal and then he scores from a impossible angle. Mrtvi kut.
Haha yup! He really is a dead angle specialist.
When he's in full speed he's lethal and then he scores from a impossible angle. Mrtvi kut.
So random.
This time it will work. We have suffered enough with transfer bad luck.
Why?
Is that some kind of random post?
This make no sense to me. We already have Rashford, Martial, Alexis and Greenwood for the striker position plus Lingard and Dybala (if we sign Mandzukic) as false 9 options. James can also play ST.
Mandzukic’ best position is arguably on the left isn’t it? That’s a position we’re definitely overcrowded in.
I doubt Mandzukic would perform better than Rashford, Martial, Dybala and perhaps even Alexis and Greenwood to be honest.None of them are good to be fair. Not even Rashford who's been terrible since Ole's first few weeks.
Sanchez only scored 1 in League last season, so I don't think he can be relied upon.This make no sense to me. We already have Rashford, Martial, Alexis and Greenwood for the striker position plus Lingard and Dybala (if we sign Mandzukic) as false 9 options. James can also play ST.
Mandzukic’ best position is arguably on the left isn’t it? That’s a position we’re definitely overcrowded in.
I doubt Mandzukic would perform better than Rashford, Martial, Dybala and perhaps even Alexis and Greenwood to be honest.
Could we end up swapping Lukuku and Darmian for Dybala and Mandzukic?
Would be really happy if we could. Gaining a warrior and losing a bit of driftwoodCould we end up swapping Lukuku and Darmian for Dybala and Mandzukic?
Obviously not, but I watched most of his game in Copa America and he was on fire so he has definitely not lost it yet. I’d rather let Rashford and Martial play who are likely to perform better than Mandzukic, Alexis who still has it in him and could potentially be great for us in that position which is his best (I know people have given up on him though, but not me ), Dybala who is at his best when playing close to the goal and also Greenwood who is a massive talent.Sanchez only scored 1 in League last season, so I don't think he can be relied upon.
I guarantee you he'll have a chant in a few months. He 'eats grass' from 1st to 90th minute.Thinking about this he’s the only player we have who people definitely wouldn’t enjoy playing against. Loads of our players are soft as shite. He’s not. He’s old and hard.
He hasn’t been too bad in preseason and I think he’s significantly better as a striker than as a winger due to him not being able to make the required off the ball runs from out wide.Why? He's an experienced striker with a good track record. Someone who can show the ropes to Greenwood and even Rashford. It's not going to be hard to perform better than the lot we have. We need to show they aren't entitled to game time regardless of how poor they've been. Seriously, Martial have been piss poor since forever.
Sheringham, that was my thought aswell.
If he wants to play with 2 strikers, he'll have 4-5 to chose from.
Rashford-Martial-Mandzukic-Greenwood(Sanchez)
Cole-Yorke-Sheringham-Solskjær
I see similarities. Mandzukic the tall one who can win in the air, and good to hold up the ball - like Sheringham.
Greenwood the fox in the box, good finisher - like Solskjær.
Not sure where Sanchez fits in, but i guess we all would be happy if he just left.
Why? He's an experienced striker with a good track record. Someone who can show the ropes to Greenwood and even Rashford. It's not going to be hard to perform better than the lot we have. We need to show they aren't entitled to game time regardless of how poor they've been. Seriously, Martial have been piss poor since forever.
Obviously not, but I watched most of his game in Copa America and he was on fire so he has definitely not lost it yet. I’d rather let Rashford and Martial play who are likely to perform better than Mandzukic, Alexis who still has it in him and could potentially be great for us in that position which is his best (I know people have given up on him though, but not me ), Dybala who is at his best when playing close to the goal and also Greenwood who is a massive talent.
On the other hand Mandzukic is excellent at pressing, probably has a very good mentality, has a lot of experience and excels on big occations. Still, I’d prefer to play better players / develop our talents than giving playing time to him.
He's not fast, and not really a clinical striker. They both seem hardworkers and physical, though.He’s a bit like Vardy right?
He's at least a different profile to all of these players mentioned.I doubt Mandzukic would perform better than Rashford, Martial, Dybala and perhaps even Alexis and Greenwood to be honest.
Yup exactly my thoughts.Once Lukaku leaves, we have no physical presence up front. Martial, Rashford, Dybala (if we signed him), James, Greenwood, Mata, Lingard or even Sanchez are all technical players, and none of them is an aerial threat. Mandzukic provides us exactly what all of them can't. A perfect plan B for us especially when some Burnley team is parking the bus and won't move their 11 players away from their penalty box. He is also extremely hardworking on the field and has a very high defensive work rate which suits our tactics.
I can accept the plus points, but how much time are we going to get out of him?
1 1/2 seasons?
He hasn’t been too bad in preseason and I think he’s significantly better as a striker than as a winger due to him not being able to make the required off the ball runs from out wide.
Rashford is a better player and a greater talent than Mandzukic, Dybala is a way better player and Greenwood is a huge talent that needs to play games.
And we also have Sanchez. We have enough players up front to be honest.
Ehh... everyone knew Falcao was coming off a big injury. This reminds me more of that summer where we went for Nani, and also brought back an Anderson. Who was great for at least two seasons anyways.The last time I was this excited! I mean I hope it works out this time, if we get either of them. But that Summer broke me!
Two players to play as a striker, attacking mid and right wing? Also, if Mandzukic signs so will Dybala surely so he has to be included.Agree to disagree mate, for me it's not about the numbers. I completely disregard Sanchez as a contributor this season, Mason is 17 and should not be counted on to play regularly. That leaves us with two players that can play as the 9, MR and AM. Dybala isnt signed so I can't consider him.
Surprised so many people are regurgitating this 'we need a big lad for plan B' idea.
We literally had this for years with Fellaini. It rarely worked and most people hated it. The vast majority of top teams don't use players like this because it doesn't work. It was horrible watching our biggest rivals, City and Liverpool, become two of the best attacking teams in the world while we frequently finished matches with our awful plan B of lobbing balls in the direction of our big man like a team from the 70s. When Solskjaer sold Fellaini he received a ton of praise for doing so. People were glad that era was over. And now people want to go back to that literally the very next transfer window. Remarkable.
Surprised so many people are regurgitating this 'we need a big lad for plan B' idea.
We literally had this for years with Fellaini. It rarely worked and most people hated it. The vast majority of top teams don't use players like this because it doesn't work. It was horrible watching our biggest rivals, City and Liverpool, become two of the best attacking teams in the world while we frequently finished matches with our awful plan B of lobbing balls in the direction of our big man like a team from the 70s. When Solskjaer sold Fellaini he received a ton of praise for doing so. People were glad that era was over. And now people want to go back to that literally the very next transfer window. Remarkable.
Not a Fellaini.Surprised so many people are regurgitating this 'we need a big lad for plan B' idea.
We literally had this for years with Fellaini. It rarely worked and most people hated it. The vast majority of top teams don't use players like this because it doesn't work. It was horrible watching our biggest rivals, City and Liverpool, become two of the best attacking teams in the world while we frequently finished matches with our awful plan B of lobbing balls in the direction of our big man like a team from the 70s. When Solskjaer sold Fellaini he received a ton of praise for doing so. People were glad that era was over. And now people want to go back to that literally the very next transfer window. Remarkable.
Jose specifically said that he was the scout for our players from Portugal as he knew so much about the Portuguese league.In this case so was every other Fred and Bailly I presume?
Mandzukic isn’t a midfielder that the manager will start semi-regularly. He also isn’t Fellaini.
You’ve made a comparison out of thin air.
Didn't Bailly come from Spain?Jose specifically said that he was the scout for our players from Portugal as he knew so much about the Portuguese league.
I made a comparison because people keep saying we should buy him as a plan B even though we had years of Fellaini doing the same thing as a plan B and most people thinking (rightly) that it sucked.
He has scored 7, 5 and 9 goals in the league the last 3 seasons. He has scored a goal every 300 minutes since joining Juve.This one is quite exciting. Hes obviously still a decent player. His game is about pressing and can finish, in fact I'd say he is a superb finisher but I'm excited because it would give us quality in depth. Something we haven't had for a while.