There’s no point keeping Rashford now, both parties need to move on. Having said that I hope we don’t bring in Muani but if it’s only a loan with no obligation it at least gives us another option.
Marcus Rashford (out)
- Thread starter Mainoonited
- Start date
There’s no point keeping Rashford now, both parties need to move on. Having said that I hope we don’t bring in Muani but if it’s only a loan with no obligation it at least gives us another option.
This is my feeling, I would rather wait to the summer and save money to bring a player in the summer.
I don't think he's a bad character necessarily but his effort on the pitch makes him seem lazy. If this is also the perception he is giving in training it sends a bad message to the rest of the team.
In the last year or so under Ten Hag he was constantly getting picked despite terrible performance and a huge lack of effort on the pitch. Couple that with him being one of the top earners and it doesn't exactly send the best message to the younger players in the squad.
They simply have to get a forward in January now...
If everyone isn't pulling together it's a waste of time. If he's unhappy he should piss off.
Dortmund are selling Malen for 25m. Since they are struggling in the league they might make the most realistic bid.
The manager banished him from matchday squads in a matter of weeks him arriving at the club. Cant even be bothered to put a shift in for his obscene wage
There’ll be someone daft enough. Teams pay loads of money for dross all the time.
You just made up that 75% though. That 75% has as much meaning as 1%, 12%, 42.5%, 67.82% because it's literally a random number that you made up.
You can't void my argument with a made up fantasy number. That's not how this works.
Did you also calculate that Rashford will very likely be going to a much better club in an easier league.
But tell us how you came with 75%..What metrics did you use? Go..
Frankly (and sadly), this guy should have been out the door with ETH in the summer. It's best for him and the club
Arsenal could do with him if they are without Saka, Nwaneri and Jesus while Martinelli is struggling.
A player who leaves his teammates hanging out to dry by walking around the pitch is a negative character.
Arsenal could be our saviours here. Arteta was arrogant enough to think he could polish the turd that is Kai Havertz, he probably thinks he could do similar with Rashford
The main problem with a loan to Arsenal is that they wouldn’t be allowed to play him against us.
I've asked the same question to several posters. You're the only person to reply yet you still haven't actually answered the question.
Only a handful of teams in Europe can pay large transfer fees AND dish out those kind of wages. That handful of clubs have better options than Rashford.
The posters expecting more than a Sancho/Greenwood type deal are dreamers.
I'm also leaning there. If we can't offload him in Jan, it makes sense to have him as we're so short of attackers right now. Keep him till the end of the season when sell him.
There's no coming back now
If he truly was in the "would prefer if he goes, but wouldn't mind if he stays" stage, then there's no point not to at least put him on the bench even if Amorim doesn't want to start him
The mere fact that he is not even with the squad means he's at the "get him out at all cost ASAP" stage. His presence is disruptive enough that Amorim doesn't even want him in the matchday squad, not even on the bench.
Like I said, there's no coming back now, he has basically gone nuclear when he gave that interview. Either we manage to sell/loan him this window, or he sits out for the rest of the season.
If I say every team is interested then I can't be wrong. Football rumours are such nonsense. I'm absolutely sure some teams are interested in Rashford but I don't believe there is any value in the rumours.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,927
- Supports
️
It’s the most obvious move for all involved.
Hopefully Walker doesn’t scupper it.
Had to laugh at the guy who had the cheek to ask Ruben about Rashford in the presser after the game yesterday.
Utd just won and he's there baiting for a totally different headline.
Utd just won and he's there baiting for a totally different headline.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,927
- Supports
- ️
Gives him someone to chat to.
They were speculating on the Athletic podcast it likely would be a spanner in the works if Milan pursue that deal - something about tax complexities following Brexit and a new ruling in Italy meaning it would likely be one or the other.
Haha our saviours? We would be saving Arsenal. I can't tell if some of you even support United. With Saka out, he would become Arsenal best winger so if Arsenal want him then we should be selling to them at a premium. Rashford is more talented than Havertz. No club in the same league would sell us their 27 year old, 140 goal player for £20M. We bought Sanchez for £35M & we sent them Mkhi and that was 7 years ago.
I can't say I've seen Milan play this season but isn't Rafael Leao their best player?
Rashford wouldn't be going there to start many games I don't think?
Rashford wouldn't be going there to start many games I don't think?
Rashford is shite now. His record is irrelevant. He’s gone idle, lost his pace and completely void of ideas as he’s always been a kick and rush.
I’m sure he’s great fun in the dressing room, but put him into a pitch surrounded by his teammates he’s poison.
I don’t care about the %
I’ve got eyes.
He’s been woeful for 2 years now
Looking forward to him leaving and us becoming unburdened by what has become
Last edited:
I think you're not realising how shite the current Marcus Rashford who has been phoning it in for atleast 18 months now while commanding a crippling wage of over 300k a week. Time to take your head out of the clouds and see that we need rid
Time and time again you miss the point.
You say no club in the same league would sell us their 27yr old 140 goal player
But repeatedly fail to acknowledge how his current and significant 350k a week salary is driving the price down.
Genuinely - what can’t you understand about that?
Reading through this thread, you’d have far more support had the player in question not been providing a miserable output for the last 2 years.
It sounds like you’d prefer us to wait. Crack on with a terrible player for a 3rd and 4th year because of what they did a long long time ago.
He barely ever even manages to crack a smile, I definitely see it.
You dont care about the % but were the one who said 75% chance he is rubbish... well clearly you care then.
Secondly, I am sure you had eyes in the last few years and criticizing McTominay the same way... Look at him at Napoli now.
Posted the same in the Garnacho thread, but Liverpool rumoured to have been offered 80m for Nunez - and we can't even get anyone to pay the full wages for Rashford on a loan. How is this possible?
Rumoured being the key word there but I'll play devil's advocate... I'm sure there'd be a Saudi club willing to pay £50m for Rashford if they believed there was any chance he'd actually go there.
A players record always matters because it shows what he is capable of at his best. The record is always relevant, saying different just to justify your hatred is crazy. Clubs always look at a players record to determine a fee..it's literally how clubs determine the price. Rashford has hit 40 GA in one of our worst teams. Rashford is capable of scoring 15+goals, 10+ assists in the right team..that is certainly worth more than £20M.
Rashford hasn't had a career threatening injury so under the right circumstances he could get back to his best. You lot also never like to admit that we have been the worst run big club in the world and we haven't really had any world class players since Sir Alex left. This isn't only a Rashford problem. Common sense tells you that in a different environment he is capable of getting back to his best. But your hatred would never allow you to admit that.
Of course you don't care about the % now that I called you out about how absurd your post was. You certainly cared about the % when you made that post.
Tell us how you came up with 75%.
But you are admitting that you just made up a %, it's not actually based on anything besides your personal vendetta against the player and therefore we shouldn't take you seriously. Thanks for clarifying. Got it.
Last edited:
Only because I can’t see the future. He’ll end up at some European side like Milan, Juve, Napoli, maybe even PSG. Maybe even someone else, I mean who saw Marseille being a potential destination for greenwood?
These clubs aren’t huge spenders but aren’t afraid of big fees or wages for the right player, and as I said Rashford is going to have to lower his demands or sit on the bench until his thirties.
No it's not completely made up. It's based on most of his career including the last 2 years of shite. I was also being generous because along with 99 % of people on here I personally think there's almost zero chance he shows the world that he's not actually shit but just lazy as feck for a club that's given him everything!
If he can't be arsed to do it for the club he loves so much why the feck would he do it for ( insert club name) for probably a minimum of £100k a week less?
You've not once acknowledged that there is a possibility he doesn't instantly turn into prime CR7 for the next few months.