Marcus Rashford (out)

[downunder red]

You don't know what to believe with with half the b.s. about these clubs being interested in the lazy fecker.
For my 2 cents worth. He isn't going anywhere. He knows he'd get crucified by the supporters of other clubs if he put a shift shift in like he has been.
I'm afraid the Rashford circus is not going any where.

 

[El-Manos]

BMW with Yugo engine under the hood

Basically

 

[Squeaky_Bum_Time]

You don't know what to believe with with half the b.s. about these clubs being interested in the lazy fecker.
For my 2 cents worth. He isn't going anywhere. He knows he'd get crucified by the supporters of other clubs if he put a shift shift in like he has been.
I'm afraid the Rashford circus is not going any where.

He’s 90% going in my opinion. People are being a bit weird expecting clubs to come in with their best offer in the first few days of the window.

The club has given off enough desperate vibes that clubs will start from a low point and see how good a deal they can get. If they can get a loan with an option to buy and United cover some of his wages, they’ll try to do that. Low risk, low commitment.

We need to be firm on either an outright transfer, or a loan covering all his wages, or a loan where we partially cover his wages but there is an obligation to buy.

This is a big transfer so it will drag on for most of the window, but I’m almost certain he will go. The longer negotiations go on, the more flexible Rashford’s camp gets too. He doesn’t want to be out of the squad for the rest of the season.

 

[soapythecat]

You don't know what to believe with with half the b.s. about these clubs being interested in the lazy fecker.
For my 2 cents worth. He isn't going anywhere. He knows he'd get crucified by the supporters of other clubs if he put a shift shift in like he has been.
I'm afraid the Rashford circus is not going any where.

I’m inclined to agree with you. If there are offers, they will be so low it might not be worth United entertaining it. I can’t see any club offering the numbers quoted in the back of his performance levels the last few years.

 

[hobbers]

What part of the club have devalued him are you not understanding? He isn't only worth £21M. Arsenal aren't saving us..they are clearly taking advantage of the situation. The same Arsenal who bought Havertz for £65M and gave him £280K. Completely pointless to sell Rashford right now. Loan him and let him raise his value. Stop panicking. Simple.

Nope. Clearly, you are letting your personal hatred for Rashford cloud your judgment.

We bought Mount for £60M with only 1 year left on his contract and he is on £250K per week. Arsenal bought Havertz for £65M and he is on £280k per week. So Stop talking to me about salaries. We have just been awful at selling and it has to stop. The same fans who want to sell Rashford for 20M will be the same fans complaining when we have no money transfers. No Arsenal aren't performing a miracle..they are taking advantage of the situation.

Again, there is no point in selling him in the winter transfer window. Rashford value is at an all time low. Loan him for 6 months, allow him to raise his value and then sell him in the summer when his value is higher and there are just more clubs in the market. We should not be panic selling. It's just bad business.

Think you need to get a grip with all this 'personal hatred' crap.

Aside making yourself look infantile, it obviously makes no difference what anyone in this thread thinks of Rashford. Love him or hate him, we won't be selling him for more than £20-30m in the summer, and it's unlikely we'll get a sale even at those numbers.

 

[united for life]

You don't know what to believe with with half the b.s. about these clubs being interested in the lazy fecker.
For my 2 cents worth. He isn't going anywhere. He knows he'd get crucified by the supporters of other clubs if he put a shift shift in like he has been.
I'm afraid the Rashford circus is not going any where.

I hope you are totally wrong. Probably you hope the same.

The difference this time is that the manager froze him out. Would he want to stay without game time and earn his wages until he runs down his contract? I say that because knowing marcus, he will not react by improving his training intensity or lifestyle. I doubt he’d want to stay like this especially that he knows that even the fans are now beyond him.

I hope a good offer comes (for the club and him) and I wish him well elsewhere

 

[EnviedRed]

Think you need to get a grip with all this 'personal hatred' crap.

Aside making yourself look infantile, it obviously makes no difference what anyone in this thread thinks of Rashford. Love him or hate him, we won't be selling him for more than £20-30m in the summer, and it's unlikely we'll get a sale even at those numbers.

It makes you look infantile to say I'm wrong just because you say so..when in fact I have given you an example of Arsenal paying £65 Million for a player who is on a similar wage to Rashford..but according to you we should give them a £45 Million discount because you say so..NOPE, that's not how business works. And Rashford will be aware that he will have to take a hit on his salary if he wants a move to his dream club if his form doesn't improve. If he wants his salary then he will have to make it up in bonuses.

Send him on loan and let him get his form..and then sell him. We all know that Rashford is capable of scoring 10-15 goals in a few months in the right conditions.

Arsenal set the market when they paid £65 Million for Havertz..they don't get to offer us £20 Million..prices go up over time not down..Stop letting your personal hatred cloud your judgment.

 

[Hammondo]

It makes you look infantile to say I'm wrong just because you say so..when in fact I have given you an example of Arsenal paying £65 Million for a player who is on a similar wage to Rashford..but according to you we should give them a £45 Million discount because you say so..NOPE, that's not how business works. And Rashford will be aware that he will have to take a hit on his salary if he wants a move to his dream club if his form doesn't improve. If he wants his salary then he will have to make it up in bonuses.

Send him on loan and let him get his form..and then sell him. We all know that Rashford is capable of scoring 10-15 goals in a few months in the right conditions.

Arsenal set the market when they paid £65 Million for Havertz..they don't get to offer us £20 Million..prices go up over time not down..Stop letting your personal hatred cloud your judgment.

Just because arsenal made a mistake previously doesn't mean they want to do it again.

Demand is what determines his price, not us.

He did his purple patch playing counter attacking football, which no good team plays, and when the team was built around him being out focal point. He won't get that at a top club.

 

[davidmichael]

If the PR machine behind Rashford is being honest in saying he doesn’t want to go to Saudi Arabia because he wants to force himself back into the England squad then they also need to be realistic and explain to him he needs to take a pay cut as no one will pay a fee to tempt United into selling AND pay his wages so he can’t have it both ways.

The alternative is keep the big wages and accept he needs to shut the feck up and knuckle down at United then show 100% commitment on the pitch for United to keep him on at the wages he’s on OR move to Saudi Arabia and earn just as much if not more but accept his England career is over, it’s very simple when you break it down and not hard to explain to Rashford but the problem lies in his PR machine telling him what a superstar he is and him buying into it.

 

[Ish]

That's the fee I can see it landing on too, unless he has a Lingard/West Ham type loan.


Think I'd rather take a lower fee and not pay any wages for him to play for another club.

I’m just guessing here, but receiving a higher selling fee (then “paying Rashford off to leave”) is probably better for PSR then just bagging the net amount?

 

[pascell]

I’m just guessing here, but receiving a higher selling fee (then “paying Rashford off to leave”) is probably better for PSR then just bagging the net amount?

Depends on the overall value of the deal in either scenario but it wouldn't look good PSR if we're paying a portion of Rashfords wages for the foreseeable.

 

[Ish]

Depends on the overall value of the deal in either scenario but it wouldn't look good PSR if we're paying a portion of Rashfords wages for the foreseeable.

Yeah I’m not expert on PSR but £60m for a homegrown talent, from my little understanding, would give us a good bump to spend - even if we were to pay Rashford £20m or so - once off (as I doubt either party would want to structure it into a weekly wage). Alas, I’ll leave it to those better informed wrt PSR to add in.