Marcus Rashford (out)

What constitutes a decent fee?

He's obviously damaged goods and he's been made an example of by the club and Amorim, which may benefit the squad going forward, but obviously from a sales perspective lowers his value. Unlike Sancho though, another lazy and somewhat unprofessional player, he's had plenty of good games for United and a few seasons ago was actually putting his body on the line (until Ole maybe ruined him), while Sancho offered United maybe 10 minutes here or there while looking like an absolute passenger 90% of his time here. So I expect a better fee.

Also, from a PSR POV, is it not better to get a higher fee and pay (subsidise his new contract) towards his contract than get a lower fee and get him clean off the books? Aren't all the teams doing some financial gymnastics to create more leeway?

I'd be quite disappointed with anything less than 45m, depending on what we contribute to his wages at his next club. 50m would be great.

Obviously it's better to loan him out where he's guaranteed to play, but not if that comes with some meagre buy-option, and then sell him in the summer.
Unfortunately I'm thinking 35-45m he's a very risky buy.
 
Milan have got rid of Okafor and made space for Rashford, Napoli look like they're about to offload Kvara so there's a couple of options there at Milan or Napoli, see who wants him.

He has the McTominay and Lukaku link at Napoli which could play a part in his decision.
 
If you can buy Rashford for £25 mill and give him £125k a week there is very little downside, and quite a bit of upside.

I dont agree you could compare him to Sancho. Rashford has done it more than one season in the PL. He is not looking good right now, but nobody is in this Man Utd team. Furthermore, he has played 1500 min of football this season. He played more than 3000 min last season.

If a team take him on loan and he hits form, he will be significantly more expensive this summer. So that is the incentive.
Rashford is far more risky. He's so lazy and lost some of his speed, there is a decent chance he would be useless for a club like AC Milan.

Sancho isn't as good physically in general, but he's technically better and works harder. He's never struggled to find a good team and even so we wouldn't get much for him either.
 
Loan Rashford to Milan with an obligation and sign Kvara for a transfer fee. Would this mean Kvara plays in the position that Bruno is currently occupying as the left sided 10?
 
No, but we might get it from someone else if he does well (or at least Milan push up how much they will pay - especially if they sell Leao).
And if he doesn't do well, which is entirely possible, he'll be worth even less
 
No, but we might get it from someone else if he does well (or at least Milan push up how much they will pay - especially if they sell Leao).
I think its more likely he performs OK to decent at best. He won't be setting the world on fire.
 
Unfortunately I'm thinking 35-45m he's a very risky buy.

You're probably right. Unless he either plays brilliantly at his loan club or will be willing to facilitate a move based on footballing pedigree and take a wage cut. Second scenario is less likely than the former, but both unlikely. Shame he ruled out Saudi. Would have been nice.
 
Do you actually think he'll put in good numbers? When was the last time he did this?
I firmly believe he will, and this is the frustration I have with him. Rashford is always a genuine goal threat when his head is right. He's been packing it in for 2 years here (and various seasons before then), but if he really applies himself, especially in a place like Italy, I feel he'll thrive for a short time (long enough to convince a team to want him) before the novelty wears off and he starts packing it in again.

Before every contract renewal his game has gone up many levels. He can definitely turn it on in Italy. I don't mind that we'll be sneered at for letting him go, I just want him out of our club
 
Last edited:
I don't mind that we'll be sneered at for letting him go, I just want him out of our club
Happens because it’s Utd.

Can remember people laughing at us and claiming JLingz was a baller because he showed up for the odd game at West Ham.

They look pretty silly now the inevitable has played out.
 
I think its more likely he performs OK to decent at best. He won't be setting the world on fire.
That would be sufficient to improve his value from now in my view and I wouldn’t rule out that he does have a very strong few months - remember Lingard and he was nowhere near the player Rashford can be (still can’t believe we didn’t cash in on that WH spell).
 
Between 40 and 50m. Considering the wages and his goals/assists record, ignoring the mixed performances the last two seasons.

No fecking chance we're going to get that and how can you just ignore 3/4 of the last 2 years? :lol:
Sounds like something Dyche would say!
 
I reckon in his head he was expecting all the big dogs to start bidding wars for him. Hopefully gets a reality check.
 
I assumed that when he gave that silly "new challenge" interview, he must have already lined up his next club. But it seems the two clubs interested in him are Como and West Ham. Honestly, I think West Ham is exactly his level.
 
I assumed that when he gave that silly "new challenge" interview, he must have already lined up his next club. But it seems the two clubs interested in him are Como and West Ham. Honestly, I think West Ham is exactly his level.

I'm honestly not sure what his level is these past two and a half years. Certainly not of a PL footballer. Even West Ham wide men will be expected to beat his man now and again, and put in a shift work-rate wise.
 
This deserved more
Goodbye, Lady Di?
Though our paths have never crossed
You had that way of strolling back
While those around you pressed?
The doubted you in training, but you
Pointed to your brain
You fed the hungry children
And then you took the Belfast plane