Oh there's been obvious collaboration for years. You don't get serious newspapers and journalists to write airy-fairy, PR puff pieces without giving something in return.
When all the leaks were happening and bring written about by same reporters that, days earlier, were writing glowingly about Rashford as if they had written a script for narration by Morgan Freeman - it really wasn't a huge mystery who their source was. One of them, at least.
I just think that if you imagine a player who let fame go to his head and he started thinking that working hard and doing the 'donkey work' on the pitch was beneath him, and all he had to do was be mercurial and demure when he felt the occasion deserved him - and who evidential had seen no benefit to change, adapt or improve any attribute or element of his game whatsoever- you'd be imaging someone exactly like how Rashford has been these last couple of years. I struggle to understand the resistance to the obvious conclusion.
Instead we get "maybe he's not playing well because he had a falling out with his girlfriend's car that he crashed because he was thinking about an injury from three years ago that made him a bit sad?" excuses.