Sammyjunn
New Member
Our fans can be a bit embarassing.
Our fans can be a bit embarassing.
BothFor overrating or underrating?
Whereas what you gave was cold, hard fact. So you think Alli and Kane were two of the three most expensive players in the world at the end of last season then?That is simply your opinion, and does not add much to the discussion to be honest.
I'm loving how the Martial vs Rashford discussion has toned down and moved on to Rashford vs Mbappe/CR7/CR9.
That is simply your opinion, and does not add much to the discussion to be honest.
19's fine, but I'm sure if he wants a relatively big number 10 will be available soon, and while not as historic as the 7, three of our best strikers of all-time have worn in in Rooney, Hughes, and RVN, and Zlaten will wear it this year. I only really see #7 as a big deal. Keane and Scholes both wore non-1 through 11 jerseys, and are arguably two of the clubs top 5 to 10 players of all time.He's going to be stuck at number 19 as now Lukaku is going to be the number 9 shirt wearer for a long while yet, isn't he? Don't think he'll get number 7 by the way
What a talent we have here
Is CR9 supposed to be Brazillian Ronaldo aka Ronaldo Nazario aka Fat Ronaldo? If so, the only person to compare Rashford to Brazillian Ronaldo is Brazilian Ronaldo.People saying there are similarities between his and Ronaldo's attitude doesn't mean he's been compared to Ronaldo.
Nobody has even mentioned the Brazilian Ronaldo with respect to him. Why do people post stuff like this?
It isn't a contradiction. He's a top talent in comparison to other players in his age group but I don't see him being a key player for a team in the future when at a peak age.Would have to do a search for you mate
Isn't this a contradiction?
You think he is a 'top talent' yet you don't see him becoming a key player for a big team in the future?
The kid is already very good. With his work ethics, Jose's management and being surrounded by some good mentors (e.g Zlatan) in the United dressing room, I really don't see him outside of that elite bracket in the next few seasons.
I know the talent Madrid has, it doesn't mean you can create a track record out of thin air because of it.Yeah, and he also plays in the Champions League where he scored 6 goals in 9 games
Because it's Real Madrid, the same club where Isco was constantly performing yet was constantly being benched behind the bigger names like Bale and James. Asensio isn't exactly going to be starting ahead of Isco, Ronaldo or Bale (their highest paid player and a president favourite) unless they're injured.
Some things are just natural, his awful composure can't really be taught, it's something natural from very little. Just because he's young doesn't mean he'll improve in all aspects. He does have the dedication though.
I think Rashford is a top talent, but I don't see him being as good as claimed. I doubt he'll become a key player for a big team in the future weather thats here or elsewhere. Compare Rashford with Dembele and Mbappe. Dembele is world class, Mbappe is on the verge (slightly more longevity is needed) however Rashford isn't either, if we do sign a better RW, he'll just be potential.
Completely wrong
Nah, more than 100 I reckon. He's not playing for some French team or something, it will take a lot to get him away from us.
bingoDepends what the question is, would someone offer that for him? No. Would we turn down bids over 100 million? I think so.
the Super via Europa is not elite. Top after 3 games isn't saying much and Leicester won the title as did Chelsea. I do not regard them Elite. Elite are the best in Europe. Just winning a domestic league, one that fails to make a mark against the best of Europe is not Elite. You are speaking after 3 bloody matches and before we even kicked a ball in the CL. Might want to wait a bit. We started with 3 wins last season and came 6th and Won the Europa (Europe's lower tier). We have only added 2 players since. Thats quite a jump!Well, most people right now will disagree with you on that. United is as elite as any other team out there right now. We just played the Super Cup, we are on top of the premier league table at the moment and are odds on favourites with City to win the title, we are in the champions league, we are coached by arguably the best manager in the world. We just recruited one of the finest young strikers in Europe and one of the best DMs in world football. We are looking absolutely solid on the pitch and on the account sheets. Arguably, the third best player in the world (Griezeman) , was heading here but for a last minute hitch.
If Dembele's Dortmund and Mbappe's Monaco are good enough pedestals for those lads, then United is certainly good enough for Rashford as a pedestal.
Both indeed. But Rashford is a top talent, that should be clear for all to see. But also clear that he isnt Mbappe/Acensio level talent. He falls a bit short which I cant blame him for. He is later in his development.For overrating or underrating?
Nothing to do with it. It's the profile of his club. United will not sell a player they want to keep for a 'fair market price'. Our job isn't to be reasonable to buyers. We are rich enough to resist 'reasonable'.
bingo
the Super via Europa is not elite. Top after 3 games isn't saying much and Leicester won the title as did Chelsea. I do not regard them Elite. Elite are the best in Europe. Just winning a domestic league, one that fails to make a mark against the best of Europe is not Elite. You are speaking after 3 bloody matches and before we even kicked a ball in the CL. Might want to wait a bit. We started with 3 wins last season and came 6th and Won the Europa (Europe's lower tier). We have only added 2 players since. Thats quite a jump!
Rashford is clearly a talent but nowhere near the same level as Mbappe and Asensio.
It's crazy how overrated he is on here. He was poor for most of last season and only ended up with five league goals. He's nowhere near Mbappe, Dembele, Martial et al.
It's crazy how overrated he is on here. He was poor for most of last season and only ended up with five league goals. He's nowhere near Mbappe, Dembele, Martial et al.
Don't want to debate about whether he's close to Dembele or not, as I've seem Dembele only in CL matches and YouTube videos but it's hilarious how you say he only ended up with five league goals and compare him to a player like Dembele who scored 6 goals himself in the league whilst playing with a much more attacking lineup. Also please don't say he's a striker, he hardly played in the striker's position last season.
And Martial who scored 4 goals.
I was just checking the minutes played by both of them last season. I was under the impression that Rashford has played a lot, lot more than Martial, however I was proved wrong. Rashford played around 1717 minutes whilst Martial played around 1554 minutes which is a difference of around 170 mins spread throughout the season which is actually nothing(stats according to Squawka).
There are far more posts about people moaning about him being compared to Mbappe/Asensio rather than him being compared to Mbappe/Asensio.
Go back a few pages. It's since been a debate about how rashford arguably isn't on their level, which only came about because a few posters decided to put him in the same boat as Asensio and Mbappe.
Key word being a few.
Hence slightly better than welbeck, considering the amount of time welbeck wae out injured.I don't think Welbeck has scored anywhere close to Rashford's tally on a per-season or per-90 basis.
Rashford hasnt played in the CL yet but has an EL winners medal. Not the same level, I know, but hed blitz that French league. Mbappe scoring 27 goals over there means feck all. We all know another Monaco legend that came to the Premier League and couldnt score a goal to save his life here and at Chelsea.Mbappe rattled goals in in the champions league knock out stages, and scored about 30 or so for Monaco.
Rashford isn't on his level. Nowhere but a United forum would suggest he is.
We'll seeEmbarrassing.
Hence slightly better than welbeck, considering the amount of time welbeck wae out injured.
You hold the preconceived notion that adding Spanish/Portuguese affixes in one's name makes him a more valuable and rated footballer. However, you could accept that while Rashford is a good talent Mbappe & Asensio are on a slightly steeper trajectory at the momentRashford - 60M
Rashfordez - 100M
Rashfordinho - 165M
PSG and Real Madrid obviously do. Mbappe is a generational talent and its pretty obvious regardless if its six months to a year. The impact he's had in his league, CL and in his international games is akin to other young stars like Rooney, Owen, Messi etc.It's not even about how good Mbappe was for six months. It's the fact that it was only six months. I'm not saying I think Rashford will end up being a better player, but it's mad that people think it's so ridiculous when they have so little evidence about him yet. Think about all the mediocre players who've been the best in the PL for five or six months over the years. Then think about how much easier it is to do that in the French league in a team who are blowing everyone else away. We just don't know how good Mbappe is going to be yet.
Well, we will have to see ain't it ? I mean yes he has scored more than what welbeck has done, but then he is sorrounded by players we havent seen the likes when welbeck was around. This squad is almost at its peak with some quality players while during welbecks time, there were few players who were in their peak. Proof of that is we almost got rid of the whole squad almost immediately after his first break out season. Players like nani, jinsung park , cleverly were gone as they were past their peak, we had anderson as our midfielder, berbatov as one of the strikers etc. Compare that to what we have now, players like zlatan, mikhitaryan, pogba, herrera, martial who is a special talent etc. I am not hating on rashford, and i would be very happy ifnhe succeds, its just that i think his gameplay makes me seems as if doesn't improve his conversion he might end up like any other young strikers who brokethrough like a genius but could not carry it much further.Significantly better than Welbeck.
Exactly the point. Regardless of the team they are playing, these players are looking smarter and sharper. Mbappe proved against some better defences in ucl and asensio too has to be special to fit into that zidane's team. Rashford has to improve in the sense , he needs to be smarter. The talent is obviously there .You hold the preconceived notion that adding Spanish/Portuguese affixes in one's name makes him a more valuable and rated footballer. However, you could accept that while Rashford is a good talent Mbappe & Asensio are on a slightly steeper trajectory at the moment