Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,413
If we're sticking with wingers in the next game, he should be starting over Sterling.
Control first touch and dribbling are the main parts of technical ability.I think you are confusing his technical ability with his dribbling mate. That does look rash at times. Technically, he seems fine, maybe not brilliant, but definitely above his peers I'd say. Having a few poor first touches etc is pretty much expected at his age.
I admit it probably is strange and I might be the only one who thinks this, but the way he goes about his play just reminds me of Tevez. His willingness to press opponents and work for the team, his tenacity in running at players and never backing out of a challenge, the way he uses his body to hold off opposition players, even the way he strikes the ball all remind me of Tevez.Strange comparison.
Of course the guy who thinks Willian is crap would say that. Get over yourself.One of the worst posts I've seen. Complete horseshit from start to end.
This may be an unpopular opinion but I think he is very poor technically. His dribbling awkward and more hoof and chase, his first touch is too heavy a lot of the time, he seems to trip over himself and lose track of the ball and he always gets the ball tangled in his feet when he does stepovers. Great finisher though
Is everybody in this thread on drugs? He isn't technically brilliant. Infestation is technically brillicit, not Rashford. He clearly needs to improve on the technical side of his game. The rest is already there.
This is pretty much my assessment of Rashford.Agreed. He is raw and weak with technique and at dribbling. Those need to be improved upon.
Good points? Very instinctive player who is always a second ahead in thought of the other players around him, is obviously very fast, he passes very accurately, is good with layoffs and one-twos, is a brilliant finisher and has excellent movement in the final third.
They are not the only parts which goes into defining technical ability either. And usually dribbling is never paired with Technique. For example Scholes had excellent technique, heavenly, but would you say he was a good dribbler ?Control first touch and dribbling are the main parts of technical ability.
His control is poor, his dribbling reliant on pace and his first touch is erratic. I'm not sitting on the guy, just pointing out areas he needs to improve in to be world class.
Of course the guy who thinks Willian is crap would say that. Get over yourself.
Rashford reminds me of Muller. Seems very awkward on the ball.They are not the only parts which goes into defining technical ability either. And usually dribbling is never paired with Technique. For example Scholes had excellent technique, heavenly, but would you say he was a good dribbler ?
That's why I just think you've intertwined the two variables. His dribbling can do with improvement, I agree and yeah some of his first touches can be a little loose as well, I won't deny that, but his ability to lay off a ball (like those lovely flicks he likes to do) or strike a ball (I think it was the Villa game was it where he struck one on the half volley ?) should be considered as part of his technical ability as well and they are really good for his age group. Sturridge fluffed his lines today trying a half volley as well and he's considered as someone with excellent technical ability and he's much older than Rashford. So it happens, hardly a surprise that he's not perfect. Rashford could do with improving his jumping abilities as well, despite being somewhat tall if he's going to play as a striker especially.
Is everybody in this thread on drugs? He isn't technically brilliant. Infestation is technically brillicit, not Rashford. He clearly needs to improve on the technical side of his game. The rest is already there.
There were many points this season where he showed his dribbling to be very proficient - mirroring the martial dribble past a defender to the byline and lay it back. I think he more tries to much at times rather than being a bad dribbler. His control I think is a mixture of slight nerves and him coming to terms with his sizeOf course the guy who thinks Willian is crap would say that. Get over yourself.
That's an interesting comparison.Rashford reminds me of Muller. Seems very awkward on the ball.
I'm not denying his shooting, layoffs and flicks aren't good. Just don't think his control, first touch and dribbling are.
He's spot on. Toothless player who has an inflated reputation because of a very brief purple patch on Free-kicks. Been dreadful since Jose's sacking.Of course the guy who thinks Willian is crap would say that. Get over yourself.
I'm not going to get into childish insults with you. Nor am I going to arrogantly insult people's posts because they disagree with me.Great come back
Very poor technically, poor dribbler, heavy first touch, trips over himself and loses track of the ball. I don't know who that is (Falcao?) but it most certainly is not Marcus Rashford. What a load of shite.
Scholes wasn't very fast and had poor agility so couldn't beat a man. His dribbling and control when dribbling was still impeccable.That's an interesting comparison.
And ffs, I typed so much, and you comeback with what you said in the first post. I'm not discussing with you anymore. .
Yeah, there are aspects of his game which he needs to work on, hopefully, we will see improvements on them.
If we're sticking with wingers in the next game, he should be starting over Sterling.
I'm not going to get into childish insults with you. Nor am I going to arrogantly insult people's posts because they disagree with me.
Its not a load of shit. I have seen him multiple times trip over the ball and nock it out of play. I have also seen his heavy touches, miscontrol the ball and over hit it when dribbling with the ball. In my opinion he needs to improve those areas of his game.
Stop acting like your opinion is fact and maybe differing opinions won't upset you so much.
Control first touch and dribbling are the main parts of technical ability.
His control is poor, his dribbling reliant on pace and his first touch is erratic. I'm not sitting on the guy, just pointing out areas he needs to improve in to be world class.
Scholes was just bloody clever. He knew how to beat a man even when he didn't he have the legs to do so. And I don't think he was as slow at the start of his career (Though I was not a United fan back then). But if you put him on the wing (I think he played there for England didn't he?), he'd probably struggle beating his marker. It doesn't make him a good dribbler though, just a really clever player.Scholes wasn't very fast and had poor agility so couldn't beat a man. His dribbling and control when dribbling was still impeccable.
Sturridge has quite poor shooting techniquemail. He scuffs the ball a lot and struggles to get power on it. His finishing is good though.
It's a lot easier to look smooth at slow motion. Berbatov looked awesome when "running" but it's a terrible comparison. Kane doesn't use pace at all when dribbling because he doesn't have any. You must compare Rashford with other speedsters. He could work on his balance, but that will come in time. He's no young Giggs, but there aren't any of his mould anymore.Not the pace. Was talking about how he gets past defenders more easily. Of course Kane is 22 and I have no idea how good he was at 18. Rashford seems to be clumsy in comparison however he actually can dribble past players (he did it once today too like martial does)
Definitely. I'd play him over Sturridge too if it's a wide role - I don't think Sturridge is disciplined or quick enough anymore to start out wide. His goalthreat should be a first choice sub upfront, or as a right forward as he was today when we need a goal.If the choice is between starting Sterling or Rashford, it's the latter all day long.
I'd end up doing the impossible and end up kneeing myself in the balls.Not a fan of those joga bonito reels but this is fecking great, I would probably tear my meniscus if I tried that.
I'd end up doing the impossible and end up kneeing myself in the balls.
This may be an unpopular opinion but I think he is very poor technically. His dribbling awkward and more hoof and chase, his first touch is too heavy a lot of the time, he seems to trip over himself and lose track of the ball and he always gets the ball tangled in his feet when he does stepovers. Great finisher though
That's all part of experience though. He's so bloody fast that he feels he can outrun everybody, even if it's just a small space. I actually love that he runs at players and commits them, I don't mind that he might lose it every now and again.He's still raw and makes some wrong decisions with the ball sometimes. I agree about the hoof and chase part as i've observed it on a few occasions where he basically ran the ball out of the field. He is very skillful though and he'll only get better with age. He also has great vision, with his interplay and little flicks to teammates that usually always come off